Cited by 661Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Prey selection by tiger, leopard and dhole in tropical forests

Karanth, K. Ullas, Sunquist, Melvin E.·1995·The Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

1. Ecological factors influencing prey selection by tiger Panthera tigris, leopard Panthera pardus and dhole Cuon alpinus were investigated in an intact assemblage of large mammals in the tropical forests of Nagarahole, southern India, between 1986 and 1990. 2. Densities of large herbivores were estimated using line transects, and population structures from area counts. Carnivore diets were determined from analyses of scats (faeces) and kills. Selectivity for prey species was inferred from likelihood ratio tests comparing observed counts of scats to hypothesized scat frequencies generated from prey density estimates using parametric bootstrap simulations. Predator selectivity for size, age, sex and physical condition of prey was estimated using selection indices. 3. Ungulate and primate prey attained a density of 91 animals km -2 and comprised 89-98% of the biomass killed. Predators showed significant (P < 0.05) selectivity among prey species. Gaur Bos gaurus were preferred by tigers, whereas wild pig Sus scrofa were under-represented in leopard diet, and langur Presbytis entellus under-represented in dhole diet. 4. Tigers selected prey weighing more than 176 kg, whereas leopard and dhole focused on prey in the 30-175 kg size class. The average weights of principal prey killed by tiger, leopard and dhole were, respectively, 91.5 kg, 37.6 kg and 43.4 kg. Tiger predation was biased towards adult males in chital, sambar and wild pig, and towards young gaur. Dholes selectively preyed on adult male chital, whereas leopards did not. 5. These findings suggest that if there is choice, large carnivores selectively kill larger prey, and non-selective predation patterns reported from other tropical forests may be the result of scarcity of large prey. Because availability of prey in the appropriate size classes is not a limiting resource, selective predation may facilitate large carnivore coexistence in Nagarahole. Community structures of large carnivores in tropical forests may be highly sensitive to natural or human-induced variations in the relative densities of different size classes of prey.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/5647

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leopards and tigers typically kill calves and females by asphyxiation using bites to their throats; 88% of 33 B. gaurus recorded killed by tigers in Nagarahole, India, were found with bites to their throats.

    “Leopards and tigers typically kill calves and females by asphyxiation using bites to their throats; 88% of 33 B. gaurus that were recorded killed by tigers were found with bites to their throats in Nagarahole, India (Karanth and Sunquist 1995).”

    From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Karanth and Sunquist 1995

  • In Nagarahole, India, adult female and adult male B. gaurus comprised 23% and 15% of tiger kills, respectively.

    “adult female and adult male B. gaurus comprised 23% and 15% of tiger kills, respectively, in Nagarahole, India (Karanth andSunquist 1995, 2000).”

    From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Karanth and Sunquist 1995

  • Density of Bos gaurus in Nagarahole Tiger Reserve between 1987 and 1990 was 5.6 (± 1.8 SE) individuals/km2.

    “5.6 (± 1.8 SE) between 1987 and 1990 (Karanth and Sunquist 1995)”

    From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Karanth and Sunquist 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karanth, K. U., & Sunquist, M. E.
Venue
The Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995-07
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
439
ISSN
0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049873744
Cited by
661
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 30
FWCI
9.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Animal Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
prey selection, tiger, leopard, dhole, large carnivores, carnivore diet, prey size selectivity, ungulate prey, gaur, wild pigs, chital, sambar, langurs, selection index, carnivore coexistence, tropical forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review