The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Yield and spatial supply of bioenergy poplar and willow short-rotation coppice in the UK
Open accessAbstract
Limited information on likely supply and spatial yield of bioenergy crops exists for the UK. Here, productivities are reported of poplar (Populus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.) grown as short-rotation coppice (SRC), using data from a large 49-site yield trial network. A partial least-squares regression technique was used to upscale actual field trial observations across England and Wales. Spatial productivity was then assessed under different land-use scenarios. Mean modelled yields ranged between 4.9 and 10.7 oven-dry tonnes (odt) ha(-1) yr(-1). Yields were generally higher in willow than in poplar, reflecting the susceptibility of older poplar genotypes to rust and their tendency for single stem dominance. Replacing 10% of arable land, 20% of improved grassland and 100% of set-aside grassland in England and Wales with the three most productive genotypes would yield 13 Modt of biomass annually (supplying 7% of UK electricity production or 48% of UK combined heat and power (CHP) production). Results show existing SRC genotypes have the immediate potential to be an important component of a mixed portfolio of renewables and that, in future, as new and improved genotypes become available, higher yields could extend this potential further.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“In Europe, the mean modeled yields for poplars ranged between 1.5 and 11.7 odt ha -1 year -1 for Aspen (Aylott et al., 2008; Johansson, 1999; Morhart et al., 2013; Verlinden et al., 2013).”
From Poplar rotation coppice at a trace element-contaminated phytomanagement site: A 10-year study revealing biomass production, element export and impact on extractable elements (2020) · cites this paper as Aylott et al., 2008
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Therefore, harsher conditions are usually required and strong nucleophiles such as sulfide (S 2-, in Kraft pulping) or sulfite ([HSO 3 ] -) ions are added to aid lignin removal and prevent lignin recondensation.34”
From Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids (2013) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. (1986) · Soil Science Society of America book series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15 · Cited by 10,674
Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604600103 · Cited by 2,871
Wedborg, M., Turner, D. R., Anderson, L. G., & Dyrssen, D. W. (1999) · doi:10.1002/9783527613984.ch7 · Cited by 1,162
The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies
Berndes, G., Hoogwijk, M., & van den Broek, R. (2003) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00185-x · Cited by 1,149
Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Powertrains in the European Context
Edwards, R., Mahieu, V., Griesemann, J. C., Jean-Francois, L., & Rickeard, D. J. (2004) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/2004-01-1924 · Cited by 1,042
Energy crops: current status and future prospects
Sims, R., Hastings, A., Schlamadinger, B., Taylor, G., & Smith, P. (2006) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01163.x · Cited by 489
Self-citationThe generation of monthly gridded datasets for a range of climatic variables over the UK
Perry, M., & Hollis, D. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1161 · Cited by 471
Bioenergy crops and carbon sequestration
Lemus, R., & Lal, R. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680590910393 · Cited by 455
Rowe, R. L., Street, N. R., & Taylor, G. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008 · Cited by 437
Self-citationNatural and induced cadmium-accumulation in poplar and willow: Implications for phytoremediation
Robinson, B. H., Mills, T. M., Petit, D., Fung, L. E., Green, S. R., & Clothier, B. (2000) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1026515007319 · Cited by 332
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- BERR, 2004, Renewables innovation review
- British Forestry Commission., 2007, Biomass Action Plan for Scotland
- Britt C, 2002, Bioenergy crops and bioremediation – a review
- Defra, 2006, Creating value from renewable materials: a strategy for nonfood crops and uses, Two year progress report (Part 1)
- Defra, 2006, Agricultural land use: 1986–2005, United Kingdom (Online database)
- Defra, 2007, Energy crop scheme: establishment grants handbook
- Drax, 2006, Corporate and social responsibility review – tackling climate change
- EC, 2005, Communication from the commission: Biomass action plan
- Gill B, 2005, Biomass task force: Report to government
- Houghton J., 2006, Breaking the biological barriers for cellulosic: a joint research agenda
- Hulme M, 2002, Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom: the UKCIP02 scientific report
- MacLeay I, 2007, The digest of UK energy statistics 2007
- Rook DA, 1991, Tree breeding and short rotation coppice
- Scottish Executive, 2007, Biomass action plan for Scotland
- Skea J, 2006, Response to the Government's Energy Review consultation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids
Brandt, A., Gräsvik, J., Hallett, J. P., & Welton, T. (2013) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c2gc36364j · Cited by 1,557
Gabrielli, P., Gazzani, M., & Mazzotti, M. (2020) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06579 · Cited by 578
A mini review on renewable sources for biofuel
Ho, D., Ngo, H. H., & Guo, W. (2014) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.022 · Cited by 497
Beringer, T., Lucht, W., & Schaphoff, S. (2011) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01088.x · Cited by 462
Methods and tools to evaluate the availability of renewable energy sources
Angelis-Dimakis, A., Biberacher, M., Domínguez, J., Fiorese, G., Gadocha, S., Gnansounou, E., Guariso, G., Kartalidis, A., Panichelli, L., Pinedo, I., et al. (2010) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.049 · Cited by 453
Metadata
- Authors
- Aylott, M. J., Casella, E., Tubby, I., Street, N. R., Smith, P., & Taylor, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Forest Research (GB)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Gail
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-03-05
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 358-370
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2032622308
- Semantic Scholar
- 07c842152db37a1749873032ef40858232e6fbbe
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 27.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- New Phytologist (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- UK Energy Research Centre
- University of Edinburgh
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/C516344/1, NE/C513169/1, NE/C516301/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
- Keywords
- short rotation coppice, poplar, willow, energy crops, biomass yield, land use scenarios, poplar rust, biomass supply, electricity generation, combined heat and power, renewable energy, England and Wales
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Conservation of Energy Resources, United Kingdom, Models, Biological, Populus, Salix
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
