Cited by 301Bioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Yield and spatial supply of bioenergy poplar and willow short-rotation coppice in the UK

Open access

Aylott, Matthew J., Casella, E., Tubby, I., Street, N. R., Smith, P., Taylor, Gail·2008·New Phytologist

DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02396.x

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Limited information on likely supply and spatial yield of bioenergy crops exists for the UK. Here, productivities are reported of poplar (Populus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.) grown as short-rotation coppice (SRC), using data from a large 49-site yield trial network. A partial least-squares regression technique was used to upscale actual field trial observations across England and Wales. Spatial productivity was then assessed under different land-use scenarios. Mean modelled yields ranged between 4.9 and 10.7 oven-dry tonnes (odt) ha(-1) yr(-1). Yields were generally higher in willow than in poplar, reflecting the susceptibility of older poplar genotypes to rust and their tendency for single stem dominance. Replacing 10% of arable land, 20% of improved grassland and 100% of set-aside grassland in England and Wales with the three most productive genotypes would yield 13 Modt of biomass annually (supplying 7% of UK electricity production or 48% of UK combined heat and power (CHP) production). Results show existing SRC genotypes have the immediate potential to be an important component of a mixed portfolio of renewables and that, in future, as new and improved genotypes become available, higher yields could extend this potential further.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02396.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Particle‐size Analysis
Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. (1986) · Soil Science Society of America book series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15 · Cited by 10,674
Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604600103 · Cited by 2,871
Determination of pH
Wedborg, M., Turner, D. R., Anderson, L. G., & Dyrssen, D. W. (1999) · doi:10.1002/9783527613984.ch7 · Cited by 1,162
The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies
Berndes, G., Hoogwijk, M., & van den Broek, R. (2003) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00185-x · Cited by 1,149
Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Powertrains in the European Context
Edwards, R., Mahieu, V., Griesemann, J. C., Jean-Francois, L., & Rickeard, D. J. (2004) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/2004-01-1924 · Cited by 1,042
Energy crops: current status and future prospects
Sims, R., Hastings, A., Schlamadinger, B., Taylor, G., & Smith, P. (2006) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01163.x · Cited by 489
Self-citation
The generation of monthly gridded datasets for a range of climatic variables over the UK
Perry, M., & Hollis, D. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1161 · Cited by 471
Bioenergy crops and carbon sequestration
Lemus, R., & Lal, R. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680590910393 · Cited by 455
Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK
Rowe, R. L., Street, N. R., & Taylor, G. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008 · Cited by 437
Self-citation
Natural and induced cadmium-accumulation in poplar and willow: Implications for phytoremediation
Robinson, B. H., Mills, T. M., Petit, D., Fung, L. E., Green, S. R., & Clothier, B. (2000) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1026515007319 · Cited by 332

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

BERR, 2004, Renewables innovation review
British Forestry Commission., 2007, Biomass Action Plan for Scotland
Britt C, 2002, Bioenergy crops and bioremediation – a review
Defra, 2006, Creating value from renewable materials: a strategy for nonfood crops and uses, Two year progress report (Part 1)
Defra, 2006, Agricultural land use: 1986–2005, United Kingdom (Online database)
Defra, 2007, Energy crop scheme: establishment grants handbook
Drax, 2006, Corporate and social responsibility review – tackling climate change
EC, 2005, Communication from the commission: Biomass action plan
Gill B, 2005, Biomass task force: Report to government
Houghton J., 2006, Breaking the biological barriers for cellulosic: a joint research agenda
Hulme M, 2002, Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom: the UKCIP02 scientific report
MacLeay I, 2007, The digest of UK energy statistics 2007
Rook DA, 1991, Tree breeding and short rotation coppice
Scottish Executive, 2007, Biomass action plan for Scotland
Skea J, 2006, Response to the Government's Energy Review consultation

Sorted by citations

Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids
Brandt, A., Gräsvik, J., Hallett, J. P., & Welton, T. (2013) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c2gc36364j · Cited by 1,557
The role of carbon capture and utilization, carbon capture and storage, and biomass to enable a net-zero-CO2 emissions chemical industry
Gabrielli, P., Gazzani, M., & Mazzotti, M. (2020) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06579 · Cited by 578
A mini review on renewable sources for biofuel
Ho, D., Ngo, H. H., & Guo, W. (2014) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.022 · Cited by 497
Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints
Beringer, T., Lucht, W., & Schaphoff, S. (2011) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01088.x · Cited by 462
Methods and tools to evaluate the availability of renewable energy sources
Angelis-Dimakis, A., Biberacher, M., Domínguez, J., Fiorese, G., Gadocha, S., Gnansounou, E., Guariso, G., Kartalidis, A., Panichelli, L., Pinedo, I., et al. (2010) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.049 · Cited by 453
Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions?
Fajardy, M., & Mac Dowell, N. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee00465f · Cited by 392
Biomass production for bioenergy using marginal lands
Mehmood, M. A., Ibrahim, M., Rashid, U., Nawaz, M., Ali, S., Hussain, A., & Gull, M. (2017) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2016.08.003 · Cited by 266
The ecological impact of biofuels
Fargione, J. E., Plevin, R. J., & Hill, J. D. (2010) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144720 · Cited by 260
Ecological benefits provided by alley cropping systems for production of woody biomass in the temperate region: a review
Tsonkova, P., Böhm, C., Quinkenstein, A., & Freese, D. (2012) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-012-9494-8 · Cited by 241
Greenhouse gas emissions from four bioenergy crops in England and Wales: Integrating spatial estimates of yield and soil carbon balance in life cycle analyses
HILLIER, J., WHITTAKER, C., DAILEY, G., AYLOTT, M., CASELLA, E., RICHTER, G. M., RICHE, A., MURPHY, R., TAYLOR, G., & SMITH, P. (2009) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01021.x · Cited by 169
Self-citation
Sugarcane as a Bioenergy Source: History, Performance, and Perspectives for Second-Generation Bioethanol
de Souza, A. P., Grandis, A., Leite, D. C. C., & Buckeridge, M. S. (2013) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-013-9366-8 · Cited by 167
Agronomic aspects of future energy crops in Europe
Zegada‐Lizarazu, W., Elbersen, H. W., Cosentino, S. L., Zatta, A., Alexopoulou, E., & Monti, A. (2010) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.242 · Cited by 157
FTIR-ATR-based prediction and modelling of lignin and energy contents reveals independent intra-specific variation of these traits in bioenergy poplars
Zhou, G., Taylor, G., & Polle, A. (2011) · Plant Methods · doi:10.1186/1746-4811-7-9 · Cited by 154
Self-citation
Land Use Implications of Increased Biomass Production Identified by GIS-Based Suitability and Yield Mapping for Miscanthus in England
Lovett, A. A., Sünnenberg, G., Richter, G. M., Dailey, A. G., Riche, A. B., & Karp, A. (2009) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-008-9030-x · Cited by 154
Limitations and prospects of natural photosynthesis for bioenergy production
Larkum, A. (2010) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.03.004 · Cited by 143
Meeting the challenge of food and energy security
Karp, A., & Richter, G. M. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err099 · Cited by 140
Short Rotation Coppice Culture of Willows and Poplars as Energy Crops on Metal Contaminated Agricultural Soils
Ruttens, A., Boulet, J., Weyens, N., Smeets, K., Adriaensen, K., Meers, E., Van Slycken, S., Tack, F., Meiresonne, L., Thewys, T., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2011.568543 · Cited by 139
The greenhouse gas removal potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) to support the UK's net-zero emission target
García-Freites, S., Gough, C., & Röder, M. (2021) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106164 · Cited by 116
Establishment and two-year growth of a bio-energy plantation with fast-growing Populus trees in Flanders (Belgium): effects of genotype and former land use
Broeckx, L. S., Verlinden, M. S., & Ceulemans, R. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.03.005 · Cited by 104
China's bioenergy potential
SANG, T., & ZHU, W. (2011) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01064.x · Cited by 104
Bioenergy crop models: descriptions, data requirements, and future challenges
Nair, S. S., Kang, S. K., Zhang, X., Miguez, F. E., Izaurralde, R. C., Post, W. M., Dietze, M. C., Lynd, L. R., & Wullschleger, S. D. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01166.x · Cited by 109
Valorization of underutilized waste biomass from invasive species to produce biochar for energy and other value-added applications
Ahmed, A., Bakar, M. S. A., Hamdani, R., Park, Y., Lam, S. S., Sukri, R. S., Hussain, M., Majeed, K., Phusunti, N., Jamil, F., et al. (2020) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109596 · Cited by 107
The production of duckweed as a source of biofuels
Xu, J., Zhao, H. L., Stomp, A.-M., & Cheng, J. J. (2012) · Biofuels · doi:10.4155/bfs.12.31 · Cited by 102
Modelling supply and demand of bioenergy from short rotation coppice and Miscanthus in the UK
Bauen, A., Dunnett, A., Richter, G. M., Dailey, A. G., Aylott, M. J., Casella, E., & Taylor, G. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.002 · Cited by 101
Self-citation
Physiological mechanisms in plant growth models: do we need a supra‐cellular systems biology approach?
Poorter, H., Anten, N. P. R., & Marcelis, L. F. M. (2013) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12123 · Cited by 97
Ranking yields of energy crops: A meta-analysis using direct and indirect comparisons
Laurent, A., Pelzer, E., Loyce, C., & Makowski, D. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.023 · Cited by 95
Is UK biofuel supply from Miscanthus water‐limited?
Richter, G. M., Riche, A. B., Dailey, A. G., Gezan, S. A., & Powlson, D. S. (2008) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00156.x · Cited by 94
Five QTL hotspots for yield in short rotation coppice bioenergy poplar: The Poplar Biomass Loci
Rae, A. M., Street, N. R., Robinson, K. M., Harris, N., & Taylor, G. (2009) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-9-23 · Cited by 92
Self-citation
Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review
Ferrarini, A., Serra, P., Almagro, M., Trevisan, M., & Amaducci, S. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.052 · Cited by 91
Two extremely different crops, Salix and Sida, as sources of renewable bioenergy
Borkowska, H., & Molas, R. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.025 · Cited by 88
Poplar and shrub willow energy crops in the United States: field trial results from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership and yield potential maps based on the PRISM‐ELM model
Volk, T. A., Berguson, B., Daly, C., Halbleib, M. D., Miller, R. O., Rials, T. G., Abrahamson, L. P., Buchman, D., Buford, M., Cunningham, M. W., et al. (2017) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12498 · Cited by 87
Paving the way for sustainable bioenergy in Europe: Technological options and research avenues for large-scale biomass feedstock supply
Gabrielle, B., Bamière, L., Caldés, N., de Cara, S., Decocq, G., Ferchaud, F., Loyce, C., Pelzer, E., Perez, Y., Wohlfahrt, J., et al. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.050 · Cited by 94
Marginal Lands to Grow Novel Bio-Based Crops: A Plant Breeding Perspective
Pancaldi, F., & Trindade, L. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00227 · Cited by 78
Mycorrhizas and biomass crops: opportunities for future sustainable development
Rooney, D. C., Killham, K., Bending, G. D., Baggs, E. M., Weih, M., & Hodge, A. (2009) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2009.08.004 · Cited by 78
The effect of row spacing and seeding rate on biomass production and plant stand characteristics of non-irrigated photoperiod-sensitive sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)
Snider, J. L., Raper, R. L., & Schwab, E. B. (2012) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.07.032 · Cited by 77
The technical potential of G reat B ritain to produce ligno‐cellulosic biomass for bioenergy in current and future climates
Hastings, A., Tallis, M. J., Casella, E., Matthews, R., Henshall, P. A., Milner, S., Smith, P., & Taylor, G. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12103 · Cited by 77
Self-citation
Slow expansion and low yields of willow short rotation coppice in Sweden; implications for future strategies
Dimitriou, I., Rosenqvist, H., & Berndes, G. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.09.006 · Cited by 73
Modelling the perennial energy crop market: the role of spatial diffusion
Alexander, P. M., Moran, D., Rounsevell, M., & Smith, P. (2013) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0656 · Cited by 72
Self-citation
Growing short rotation coppice on agricultural land in Germany: A Real Options Approach
Mußhoff, O. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.001 · Cited by 71
Life cycle assessment of biohydrogen production as a transportation fuel in Germany
Wulf, C., & Kaltschmitt, M. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.127 · Cited by 70
A GIS based assessment of bioenergy potential in England within existing energy systems
Thomas, A. R. C., Bond, A., & Hiscock, K. M. (2013) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.010 · Cited by 69
Multi-criteria, multi-objective and uncertainty analysis for agro-energy spatial modelling
Tenerelli, P., & Carver, S. (2011) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.013 · Cited by 69
Carbon Claims and Energy Landscapes: Exploring the Political Ecology of Biomass
van der Horst, D., & Evans, J. (2010) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426390903564879 · Cited by 68
Physical and chemical characterization of biochars produced from coppiced wood of thirteen tree species for use in horticultural substrates
Vaughn, S. F., Kenar, J. A., Eller, F. J., Moser, B. R., Jackson, M. A., & Peterson, S. C. (2014) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.12.026 · Cited by 68
Production potential of 36 poplar clones grown at medium length rotation in Denmark
Nielsen, U. B., Madsen, P., Hansen, J. K., Nord‐Larsen, T., & Nielsen, A. T. (2014) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.030 · Cited by 66
The economics of short rotation coppice in Germany
Faasch, R. J., & Patenaude, G. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.012 · Cited by 66
Poplar volatiles – biosynthesis, regulation and (eco)physiology of isoprene and stress‐induced isoprenoids
Schnitzler, J., Louis, S., Behnke, K., & Loivamäki, M. (2009) · Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00284.x · Cited by 65
Development and evaluation of ForestGrowth‐ SRC a process‐based model for short rotation coppice yield and spatial supply reveals poplar uses water more efficiently than willow
Tallis, M. J., Casella, E., Henshall, P. A., Aylott, M. J., Randle, T. J., Morison, J. I. L., & Taylor, G. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01191.x · Cited by 66
Self-citation
Poplar Short Rotation Coppice Plantations under Mediterranean Conditions: The Case of Spain
Oliveira, N., Pérez‐Cruzado, C., Cañellas, I., Rodríguez‐Soalleiro, R., & Sixto, H. (2020) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f11121352 · Cited by 63
Yields of willow biomass crops across a range of sites in North America
Volk, T. A., Abrahamson, L. P., Cameron, K. D., Castellano, P. J., Corbin, T., Fabio, E. S., Johnson, G. A., Kuzovkina-Eischen, Y., Labrecque, M., Miller, R. O., et al. (2011) · Cited by 62
Isoprene emission‐free poplars – a chance to reduce the impact from poplar plantations on the atmosphere
Behnke, K., Grote, R., Brüggemann, N., Zimmer, I., Zhou, G., Elobeid, M. M., Janz, D., Polle, A., & Schnitzler, J. (2011) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03979.x · Cited by 61
Scaling of photosynthesis and constitutive and induced volatile emissions with severity of leaf infection by rust fungus (Melampsora larici-populina) inPopulus balsamiferavar.suaveolens
Jiang, Y., Ye, J., Veromann‐Jürgenson, L., & Niinemets, Ü. (2016) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpw035 · Cited by 60
Economic evaluation of agricultural land to assess land use changes
Ustaoğlu, E., Carolina, P. C., Jacobs‐Crisioni, C., & Lavalle, C. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.020 · Cited by 58
Variation in Cell Wall Composition and Accessibility in Relation to Biofuel Potential of Short Rotation Coppice Willows
Ray, M. J., Brereton, N. J. B., Shield, I. F., Karp, A., & Murphy, R. J. (2012) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-011-9177-8 · Cited by 57
Biomass production of four willow clones grown as short rotation coppice on two soil types in Denmark
Sevel, L., Nord‐Larsen, T., & Raulund‐Rasmussen, K. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.06.030 · Cited by 57
Towards optimizing wood development in bioenergy trees
Nieminen, K. M., Robischon, M., Immanen, J., & Helariutta, Y. (2011) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04011.x · Cited by 57
A framework for reviewing the trade-offs between, renewable energy, food, feed and wood production at a local level
Burgess, P. J., Casado, M. R., Gavu, J., Mead, A., Cockerill, T., Lord, R., van der Horst, D., & HOWARD, D. C. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.142 · Cited by 56
Proteome Analysis of Poplar Seed Vigor
Hong, Z., Wang, W.-Q., Liu, S., Møller, I. M., & Song, S. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132509 · Cited by 55
Land availability and potential biomass production with poplar and willow short rotation coppices in Germany
Aust, C., Schweier, J., Brodbeck, F., Sauter, U. H., Becker, G., & Schnitzler, J. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12083 · Cited by 59
Growth and Physiology
Dillen, S. Y., Rood, S. B., & Ceulemans, R. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1541-2_3 · Cited by 54
Economic feasibility of CHP facilities fueled by biomass from unused agriculture land: Case of Croatia
Pfeifer, A., Dominković, D. F., Ćosić, B., & Duić, N. (2016) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.090 · Cited by 53
Nitrogen fluxes during the initial stage of willows and poplars in short‐rotation coppices
Balasus, A., Bischoff, W., Schwarz, A., Scholz, V., & Kern, J. (2012) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.201100346 · Cited by 53
Genotype × environment interaction analysis of North American shrub willow yield trials confirms superior performance of triploid hybrids
Fabio, E. S., Volk, T. A., Miller, R. O., Serapiglia, M. J., Gauch, H. G., Rees, K. C. J. V., Hangs, R. D., Amichev, B. Y., Kuzovkina, Y. A., Labrecque, M., et al. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12344 · Cited by 53
Multi‐criteria assessment of yellow, green, and woody biomasses: pre‐screening of potential biomasses as feedstocks for biorefineries
Parajuli, R., Knudsen, M. T., & Dalgaard, T. (2015) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1567 · Cited by 51
Fixed physiological parameters in the 3-PG model produced accurate estimates of loblolly pine growth on sites in different geographic regions
Bryars, C. H., Maier, C. A., Zhao, D., Kane, M. B., Borders, B. E., Will, R. E., & Teskey, R. O. (2012) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.031 · Cited by 51
S-Nitroso-Proteome in Poplar Leaves in Response to Acute Ozone Stress
Vanzo, E. M., Ghirardo, A., Merl‐Pham, J., Lindermayr, C., Heller, W. E., Hauck, S. M., Durner, J., & Schnitzler, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106886 · Cited by 51
Operational short rotation woody crop plantations: Manual or mechanised harvesting?
Vanbeveren, S. P. P., Schweier, J., Berhongaray, G., & Ceulemans, R. (2014) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.11.019 · Cited by 50
Life Cycle Assessment and sustainability methodologies for assessing industrial crops, processes and end products
Black, M. J., Whittaker, C., Hosseini, S. A., Diaz-Chavez, R. A., Woods, J., & Murphy, R. (2011) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.12.002 · Cited by 50
Evapotranspiration of a high-density poplar stand in comparison with a reference grass cover in the Czech–Moravian Highlands
Fischer, M., Trnka, M., Kučera, J., Deckmyn, G., Orság, M., Sedlák, P., Žalud, Z., & Ceulemans, R. (2013) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.07.004 · Cited by 50
Environmental impacts of bioenergy wood production from poplar short‐rotation coppice grown at a marginal agricultural site in Germany
Schweier, J., Molina‐Herrera, S., Ghirardo, A., Grote, R., Díaz‐Pinés, E., Kreuzwieser, J., Haas, E., Butterbach‐Bahl, K., Rennenberg, H., Schnitzler, J., et al. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12423 · Cited by 50
Parameterization of the 3-PG model for Pinus elliottii stands using alternative methods to estimate fertility rating, biomass partitioning and canopy closure
González-Benecke, C. A., Jokela, E. J., Cropper, W. P., Bracho, R., & Leduc, D. J. (2014) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.030 · Cited by 49
Isoprene function in two contrasting poplars under salt and sunflecks
Behnke, K., Ghirardo, A., Janz, D., Kanawati, B., Esperschütz, J., Zimmer, I., Schmitt‐Kopplin, P., Niinemets, Ü., Polle, A., Schnitzler, J., et al. (2013) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpt018 · Cited by 48
Using a Process-Based Model (3-PG) to Predict and Map Hybrid Poplar Biomass Productivity in Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA
Headlee, W. L., Zalesny, R. S., Donner, D. M., & Hall, R. B. (2012) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9251-x · Cited by 46
Estimating the supply of biomass from short-rotation coppice in England, given social, economic and environmental constraints to land availability
Aylott, M. J., Casella, E., Farrall, K., & Taylor, G. (2010) · Biofuels · doi:10.4155/bfs.10.30 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Reviewing wood biomass potentials for energy in Europe: the role of forests and fast growing plantations
Mola‐Yudego, B., Arévalo, J. M., Díaz‐Yáñez, O., Dimitriou, I., Freshwater, E., Haapala, A., Khanam, T., & Selkimäki, M. (2017) · Biofuels · doi:10.1080/17597269.2016.1271627 · Cited by 45
Biocrude production and nutrients recovery through hydrothermal liquefaction of wastewater irrigated willow
Conti, F., Toor, S. S., Pedersen, T. H., Nielsen, A. H., & Rosendahl, L. A. (2018) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.07.012 · Cited by 46
Importance of crown architecture for leaf area index of different Populus genotypes in a high-density plantation
Broeckx, L. S., Verlinden, M. S., Vangronsveld, J., & Ceulemans, R. (2012) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tps083 · Cited by 44
Carbon storage in hedge biomass—A case study of actively managed hedges in England
Axe, M., Grange, I., & Conway, J. S. (2017) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2017.08.008 · Cited by 44
The impact of sustainable energy production on land use in Britain through to 2050
HOWARD, D. C., Wadsworth, R. A., Whitaker, J., Hughes, N., & Bunce, R. G. H. (2009) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.017 · Cited by 44
Opportunities and barriers for biofuel and bioenergy production from poplar
An, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Lu, M., Kang, X., Mansfield, S. D., Zeng, W., & Zhang, J. (2021) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12829 · Cited by 42
Biomass production assessment from Populus spp. short‐rotation irrigated crops in Spain
Pérez‐Cruzado, C., de Ron, D. S., Rodríguez‐Soalleiro, R., Hernández, M. J., Sánchez‐Martín, M. M., Cañellas, I., & Sixto, H. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12061 · Cited by 42
Aboveground productivity and soil carbon storage of biofuel crops inOhio
Bonin, C. L., & Lal, R. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12041 · Cited by 41
Development of Sustainable Willow Short Rotation Forestry in Northern Europe
Verwijst, T., Lundkvist, A., Edelfeldt, S., & Albertsso, J. (2013) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/55072 · Cited by 41
Effects of changing farm management and farm structure on energy balance and energy-use efficiency—A case study of organic and conventional farming systems in southern Germany
Lin, H.-C., Huber, J. A., Gerl, G., & Hülsbergen, K. (2016) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2016.06.003 · Cited by 41
Facing the Future: Effects of Short-Term Climate Extremes on Isoprene-Emitting and Nonemitting Poplar
Vanzo, E. M., Jud, W., Li, Z., Albert, A., Domagalska, M. A., Ghirardo, A., Niederbacher, B., Frenzel, J., Beemster, G. T. S., Asard, H., et al. (2015) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.15.00871 · Cited by 44
The effect of a dry spring on seasonal carbon allocation and vegetation dynamics in a poplar bioenergy plantation
Broeckx, L. S., Verlinden, M. S., Berhongaray, G., Zona, D., Fichot, R., & Ceulemans, R. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12087 · Cited by 40
Change in Yield Between First and Second Rotations in Willow (Salix spp.) Biomass Crops is Strongly Related to the Level of First Rotation Yield
Sleight, N. J., Volk, T. A., Johnson, G. A., Eisenbies, M. H., Shi, S., Fabio, E. S., & Pooler, P. S. (2015) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-015-9684-0 · Cited by 39
Water use of a multigenotype poplar short‐rotation coppice from tree to stand scale
Bloemen, J., Fichot, R., Horemans, J. A., Broeckx, L. S., Verlinden, M. S., Zenone, T., & Ceulemans, R. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12345 · Cited by 39
Estimating UK perennial energy crop supply using farm‐scale models with spatially disaggregated data
Alexander, P. M., Moran, D., Smith, P., Hastings, A., Wang, S., Sünnenberg, G., Lovett, A. A., Tallis, M. J., Casella, E., Taylor, G., et al. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12121 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Biofuels from perennial energy crops on buffer strips: A win-win strategy
Agostini, A., Serra, P., Giuntoli, J., Martani, E., Ferrarini, A., & Amaducci, S. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126703 · Cited by 39
A physiological and biophysical model of coppice willow ( S alix spp.) production yields for the contiguous USA in current and future climate scenarios
Wang, D., Jaiswal, D., LeBauer, D. S., Wertin, T. M., Bollero, G. A., Leakey, A. D. B., & Long, S. P. (2015) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12556 · Cited by 37
A Critical Review on Lignocellulosic Biomass Yield Modeling and the Bioenergy Potential from Marginal Land
Haberzettl, J., Hilgert, P., & von Cossel, M. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11122397 · Cited by 37
Biophysical drivers of the carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy exchanges of a short-rotation poplar coppice
Zenone, T., Fischer, M., Arriga, N., Broeckx, L. S., Verlinden, M. S., Vanbeveren, S. P. P., Zona, D., & Ceulemans, R. (2015) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.04.009 · Cited by 37
Dry Matter Losses and Methane Emissions During Wood Chip Storage: the Impact on Full Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Savings of Short Rotation Coppice Willow for Heat
Whittaker, C., Macalpine, W. J., Yates, N. E., & Shield, I. F. (2016) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-016-9728-0 · Cited by 37
Phosphorus nutrition of Populus × canescens reflects adaptation to high P-availability in the soil
Netzer, F., Mueller, C. W., Scheerer, U., Grüner, J., Kögel‐Knabner, I., Herschbach, C., & Rennenberg, H. (2017) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpx126 · Cited by 36
Evapotranspiration over agroforestry sites in Germany
Markwitz, C., Knohl, A., & Siebicke, L. (2020) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-17-5183-2020 · Cited by 36
Economic Modelling of Poplar Short Rotation Coppice Plantations in Hungary
Schiberna, E., Borovics, A., & Benke, A. (2021) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f12050623 · Cited by 36
Strategic deployment of riparian buffers and windbreaks in Europe can co-deliver biomass and environmental benefits
Englund, O., Börjesson, P., Mola‐Yudego, B., Berndes, G., Dimitriou, I., Cederberg, C., & Scarlat, N. (2021) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00247-y · Cited by 36
How Much Yield Should We Expect from Fast-Growing Plantations for Energy? Divergences Between Experiments and Commercial Willow Plantations
Mola‐Yudego, B., Díaz‐Yáñez, O., & Dimitriou, I. (2015) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-015-9630-1 · Cited by 35
The potential for bioenergy crops to contribute to meeting GB heat and electricity demands
Wang, S., Hastings, A., Wang, S., Sunnenberg, G., Tallis, M. J., Casella, E., Taylor, S., Alexander, P., Cisowska, I., Lovett, A., et al. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12123 · Cited by 33
Self-citation

Authors: Aylott, M. J., Casella, E., Tubby, I., Street, N. R., Smith, P., & Taylor, G.
Affiliations: University of Southampton (GB)
Forest Research (GB)
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author: Taylor, Gail
ORCID: Casella, E.
Street, N. R.
Smith, P.
Taylor, Gail
Venue: New Phytologist
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2008-03-05
Volume: 178
Issue: 2
Pages: 358-370
ISSN: 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
1469-8137
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02396.x
OpenAlex: W2032622308
Semantic Scholar: 07c842152db37a1749873032ef40858232e6fbbe
Cited by: 301
References: 46
Citations by year: 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 33
FWCI: 27.01
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: hybrid
doi.org
Licence: other-oa
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: New Phytologist (publishedVersion, other-oa)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Funders: UK Energy Research Centre
University of Edinburgh
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/C516344/1, NE/C513169/1, NE/C516301/1)
Topics: Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords: short rotation coppice, poplar, willow, energy crops, biomass yield, land use scenarios, poplar rust, biomass supply, electricity generation, combined heat and power, renewable energy, England and Wales
MeSH terms: Agriculture, Conservation of Energy Resources, United Kingdom, Models, Biological, Populus, Salix

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Yield and spatial supply of bioenergy poplar and willow short-rotation coppice in the UK

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks