Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The evolutionary ecology of clonally propagated domesticated plants

Open access
McKey, Doyle, Elias, Marianne, Pujol, Benoît, Duputié, Anne·2010·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: While seed‐propagated crops have contributed many evolutionary insights, evolutionary biologists have often neglected clonally propagated crops. We argue that widespread notions about their evolution under domestication are oversimplified, and that they offer rich material for evolutionary studies. The diversity of their wild ancestors, the diverse ecologies of the crop populations themselves, and the intricate mix of selection pressures, acting not only on the parts harvested but also on the parts used by humans to make clonal propagules, result in complex and diverse evolutionary trajectories under domestication. We examine why farmers propagate some plants clonally, and discuss the evolutionary dynamics of sexual reproduction in clonal crops. We explore how their mixed clonal/sexual reproductive systems function, based on the sole example studied in detail, cassava ( Manihot esculenta ). Biotechnology is now expanding the number of clonal crops, continuing the 10 000‐yr‐old trend to increase crop yields by propagating elite genotypes. In an era of rapid global change, it is more important than ever to understand how the adaptive potential of clonal crops can be maintained. A key component of strategies for preserving this adaptive potential is the maintenance of mixed clonal/sexual systems, which can be achieved by encouraging and valuing farmer knowledge about the sexual reproductive biology of their clonal crops. Contents Summary 318 I. Domesticated plants as model systems in evolutionary biology: bringing clonally propagated crops into the fold 319 II. Advantages and disadvantages of clonal propagation 319 III. Evolution in clonal populations: somatic mutations and epigenetic traits as sources of heritable variation 321 IV. Evolutionary dynamics of sex in clonally propagated crop plants 323 V. Mixed clonal‐sexual systems: how do they work? 325 VI. Domestication syndromes in clonally propagated crops 327 VII. The future of clonally propagated domesticated plants 328 Acknowledgements 329 References 329

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03210.x

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
McKey, D., Elias, M., Pujol, B., & Duputié, A.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-25
Volume
186
Issue
2
Pages
318-332
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2158898879
Cited by
425
References
84
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolutionary ecology of clonally propagated domesticated plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03210.x
The paper
McKey, D., Elias, M., Pujol, B., & Duputié, A. (2010). The evolutionary ecology of clonally propagated domesticated plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03210.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.