The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolutionary ecology of clonally propagated domesticated plants
Open accessAbstract
Summary: While seed‐propagated crops have contributed many evolutionary insights, evolutionary biologists have often neglected clonally propagated crops. We argue that widespread notions about their evolution under domestication are oversimplified, and that they offer rich material for evolutionary studies. The diversity of their wild ancestors, the diverse ecologies of the crop populations themselves, and the intricate mix of selection pressures, acting not only on the parts harvested but also on the parts used by humans to make clonal propagules, result in complex and diverse evolutionary trajectories under domestication. We examine why farmers propagate some plants clonally, and discuss the evolutionary dynamics of sexual reproduction in clonal crops. We explore how their mixed clonal/sexual reproductive systems function, based on the sole example studied in detail, cassava ( Manihot esculenta ). Biotechnology is now expanding the number of clonal crops, continuing the 10 000‐yr‐old trend to increase crop yields by propagating elite genotypes. In an era of rapid global change, it is more important than ever to understand how the adaptive potential of clonal crops can be maintained. A key component of strategies for preserving this adaptive potential is the maintenance of mixed clonal/sexual systems, which can be achieved by encouraging and valuing farmer knowledge about the sexual reproductive biology of their clonal crops. Contents Summary 318 I. Domesticated plants as model systems in evolutionary biology: bringing clonally propagated crops into the fold 319 II. Advantages and disadvantages of clonal propagation 319 III. Evolution in clonal populations: somatic mutations and epigenetic traits as sources of heritable variation 321 IV. Evolutionary dynamics of sex in clonally propagated crop plants 323 V. Mixed clonal‐sexual systems: how do they work? 325 VI. Domestication syndromes in clonally propagated crops 327 VII. The future of clonally propagated domesticated plants 328 Acknowledgements 329 References 329
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Consequences of changing biodiversity
Chapin III, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012241 · Cited by 4,282
The relation of recombination to mutational advance
Muller, H. J. (1964) · Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8 · Cited by 2,512
STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE FOR DENSITY DEPENDENCE IN ABUNDANCE TIME SERIES OF 1198 SPECIES
Brook, B. W., & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1445:soefdd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,082
Plant Disease: A Threat to Global Food Security
Strange, R. N., & Scott, P. R. (2005) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.113004.133839 · Cited by 1,802
Jablonka, E., & Raz, G. (2009) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/598822 · Cited by 1,662
Genetic diversity and disease control in rice
Zhu, Y., Chen, H., Fan, J., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, J., Fan, J., Yang, S., Hu, L., Leung, H., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35021046 · Cited by 1,619
Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants?
Ellstrand, N. C., & Schierenbeck, K. A. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.13.7043 · Cited by 1,606
The costs of reproduction in plants
Obeso, J. R. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x · Cited by 1,377
Muller, H. J. (1932) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/280418 · Cited by 1,264
Cited by
Widespread natural variation of DNA methylation within angiosperms
Niederhuth, C. E., Bewick, A. J., Ji, L., Alabady, M. S., Kim, K. D., Li, Q., Rohr, N. A., Rambani, A., Burke, J. M., Udall, J. A., et al. (2016) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1059-0 · Cited by 566
Crop genetic erosion: understanding and responding to loss of crop diversity
Khoury, C. K., Brush, S., Costich, D. E., Curry, H. A., de Haan, S., Engels, J. M. M., Guarino, L., Hoban, S., Mercer, K. L., Miller, A. J., et al. (2022) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17733 · Cited by 471
Crops that feed the world 8: Potato: are the trends of increased global production sustainable?
Birch, P. R. J., Bryan, G., Fenton, B., Gilroy, E. M., Hein, I., Jones, J. T., Prashar, A., Taylor, M. A., Torrance, L., & Toth, I. K. (2012) · Food Security · doi:10.1007/s12571-012-0220-1 · Cited by 441
From forest to field: Perennial fruit crop domestication
Miller, A. J., & Gross, B. L. (2011) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1000522 · Cited by 437
The population genetics of structural variants in grapevine domestication
Zhou, Y., Minio, A., Massonnet, M., Solares, E., Lv, Y., Beridze, T., Cantu, D., & Gaut, B. S. (2019) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-019-0507-8 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- McKey, D., Elias, M., Pujol, B., & Duputié, A.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-25
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 318-332
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2158898879
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolutionary ecology of clonally propagated domesticated plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03210.x
- The paper
- McKey, D., Elias, M., Pujol, B., & Duputié, A. (2010). The evolutionary ecology of clonally propagated domesticated plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03210.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.