The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Widespread natural variation of DNA methylation within angiosperms
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: DNA methylation is an important feature of plant epigenomes, involved in the formation of heterochromatin and affecting gene expression. Extensive variation of DNA methylation patterns within a species has been uncovered from studies of natural variation. However, the extent to which DNA methylation varies between flowering plant species is still unclear. To understand the variation in genomic patterning of DNA methylation across flowering plant species, we compared single base resolution DNA methylomes of 34 diverse angiosperm species. RESULTS: By analyzing whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data in a phylogenetic context, it becomes clear that there is extensive variation throughout angiosperms in gene body DNA methylation, euchromatic silencing of transposons and repeats, as well as silencing of heterochromatic transposons. The Brassicaceae have reduced CHG methylation levels and also reduced or loss of CG gene body methylation. The Poaceae are characterized by a lack or reduction of heterochromatic CHH methylation and enrichment of CHH methylation in genic regions. Furthermore, low levels of CHH methylation are observed in a number of species, especially in clonally propagated species. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal the extent of variation in DNA methylation in angiosperms and show that DNA methylation patterns are broadly a reflection of the evolutionary and life histories of plant species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads
Martin, M. (2011) · EMBnet.journal · doi:10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · Cited by 33,889
BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Quinlan, A. R., & Hall, I. M. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · Cited by 27,437
Kim, D., Pertea, G., Trapnell, C., Pimentel, H., Kelley, R., & Salzberg, S. L. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 · Cited by 12,668
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis
Bouckaert, R., Heled, J., Kühnert, D., Vaughan, T., Wu, C.-H., Xie, D., Suchard, M. A., Rambaut, A., & Drummond, A. J. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537 · Cited by 6,527
Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond
Jones, P. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3230 · Cited by 6,061
Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals
Feng, S., Cokus, S. J., Zhang, X., Chen, P.-Y., Bostick, M., Goll, M. G., Hetzel, J., Jain, J., Strauss, S. H., Halpern, M. E., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002720107 · Cited by 1,285
DNA methylation pathways and their crosstalk with histone methylation
Du, J., Johnson, L. M., Jacobsen, S. E., & Patel, D. J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm4043 · Cited by 1,000
Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical DNA methylation variation
Schultz, M. D., He, Y., Whitaker, J. W., Hariharan, M., Mukamel, E. A., Leung, D., Rajagopal, N., Nery, J. R., Urich, M. A., Chen, H., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14465 · Cited by 690
The draft genome and transcriptome of Cannabis sativa.
van Bakel, H., Stout, J. M., Cote, A. G., Tallon, C. M., Sharpe, A. G., Hughes, T. R., & Page, J. E. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-r102 · Cited by 575
Cited by
The Physcomitrella patens chromosome‐scale assembly reveals moss genome structure and evolution
Lang, D., Ullrich, K. K., Murat, F., Fuchs, J., Jenkins, J., Haas, F. B., Piednoel, M., Gundlach, H., Van Bel, M., Meyberg, R., et al. (2018) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13801 · Cited by 423
Self-citationGene body DNA methylation in plants
Bewick, A. J., & Schmitz, R. J. (2017) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2016.12.007 · Cited by 409
Self-citationPlant Transgenerational Epigenetics
Quadrana, L., & Colot, V. (2016) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-035254 · Cited by 331
DNA methylation dynamics during early plant life
Bouyer, D., Kramdi, A., Kassam, M., Heese, M., Schnittger, A., Roudier, F., & Colot, V. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1313-0 · Cited by 239
Lin, W., Xiao, X., Zhang, H., Li, Y., Liu, S., Sun, W., Zhang, X., & Wu, Q. (2019) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes10110877 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Niederhuth, C. E., Bewick, A. J., Ji, L., Alabady, M. S., Kim, K. D., Li, Q., Rohr, N. A., Rambani, A., Burke, J. M., Udall, J. A., Egesi, C., Schmutz, J., Grimwood, J., Jackson, S. A., Springer, N. M., & Schmitz, R. J.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2016-09-27
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 194-194
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- OpenAlex
- W2950103832
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 23.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Widespread natural variation of DNA methylation within angiosperms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13059-016-1059-0
- The paper
- Niederhuth, C. E., Bewick, A. J., Ji, L., Alabady, M. S., Kim, K. D., Li, Q., Rohr, N. A., Rambani, A., Burke, J. M., Udall, J. A., Egesi, C., Schmutz, J., Grimwood, J., Jackson, S. A., Springer, N. M., & Schmitz, R. J. (2016). Widespread natural variation of DNA methylation within angiosperms. Genome Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1059-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
