The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants
Abstract
Summary: How plants interact with sunlight is central to the existence of life and provides a window to the functioning of ecosystems. Although the basic properties of leaf spectra have been known for decades, interpreting canopy‐level spectra is more challenging because leaf‐level effects are complicated by a host of stem‐ and canopy‐level traits. Progress has been made through empirical analyses and models, although both methods have been hampered by a series of persistent challenges. Here, I review current understanding of plant spectral properties with respect to sources of uncertainty at leaf to canopy scales. I also discuss the role of evolutionary convergence in plant functioning and the difficulty of identifying individual properties among a suite of interrelated traits. A pattern that emerges suggests a synergy among the scattering effects of leaf‐, stem‐ and canopy‐level traits that becomes most apparent in the near‐infrared (NIR) region. This explains the widespread and well‐known importance of the NIR region in vegetation remote sensing, but presents an interesting paradox that has yet to be fully explored: that we can often gain more insight about the functioning of plants by examining wavelengths that are not used in photosynthesis than by examining those that are. Contents Summary 375 I. Introduction 376 II. Physical properties of incident radiation 377 III. Sources of variability in vegetation reflectance 378 IV. The combined effects of multiple traits on whole‐canopy reflectance 383 V. Functional convergence among optically important traits 387 VI. Conclusions 389 Acknowledgements 389 References 390
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754 · cited 1×
“That this challenge exists is far from a new idea and, in the ecological and ecophysiological literature, convergence among plant traits has been an active research topic for some time (e.g. Grime, 1977; Mooney & Gulmon, 1979; Wright et al., 2004).”
Background
Cited by
Berger, K., Verrelst, J., Féret, J.-B., Wang, Z., Wocher, M., Strathmann, M., Danner, M., Mauser, W., & Hank, T. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111758 · Cited by 429
Yue, J., Yang, G., Tian, Q., Feng, H., Xu, K., & Zhou, C. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.022 · Cited by 423
Quantifying forest canopy traits: Imaging spectroscopy versus field survey
Asner, G. P., Martin, R. E., Anderson, C. B., & Knapp, D. E. (2015) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.011 · Cited by 386
Physiological Traits for Improving Heat Tolerance in Wheat
Cossani, C. M., & Reynolds, M. P. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.207753 · Cited by 344
High‐throughput Phenotyping and Genomic Selection: The Frontiers of Crop Breeding ConvergeF
Cabrera‐Bosquet, L., Crossa, J., von Zitzewitz, J., Serret, M. D., & Luis Araus, J. (2012) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01116.x · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Ollinger, S. V.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-16
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 375-394
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2150853404
- Cited by
- 798
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03536.x
- The paper
- Ollinger, S. V. (2011). Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03536.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.