The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation
Open accessAbstract
Signals from eye movements and blinks can be orders of magnitude larger than brain‐generated electrical potentials and are one of the main sources of artifacts in electroencephalographic (EEG) data. Rejecting contaminated trials causes substantial data loss, and restricting eye movements/blinks limits the experimental designs possible and may impact the cognitive processes under investigation. This article presents a method based on blind source separation (BSS) for automatic removal of electroocular artifacts from EEG data. BBS is a signal‐processing methodology that includes independent component analysis (ICA). In contrast to previously explored ICA‐based methods for artifact removal, this method is automated. Moreover, the BSS algorithm described herein can isolate correlated electroocular components with a high degree of accuracy. Although the focus is on eliminating ocular artifacts in EEG data, the approach can be extended to other sources of EEG contamination such as cardiac signals, environmental noise, and electrode drift, and adapted for use with magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data, a magnetic correlate of EEG.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts
Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1994) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(94)90094-9 · Cited by 696
Dealing with artifacts: The EOG contamination of the event-related brain potential
Gratton, G. (1998) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03209415 · Cited by 142
Cited by
Delorme, A., Sejnowski, T., & Makeig, S. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.004 · Cited by 1,759
EEG artifact removal—state-of-the-art and guidelines
Urigüen, J. A., & Garcia-Zapirain, B. (2015) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/12/3/031001 · Cited by 963
Chaumon, M., Bishop, D. V. M., & Busch, N. A. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.02.025 · Cited by 833
Semi-automatic identification of independent components representing EEG artifact
Campos Viola, F., Thorne, J., Edmonds, B., Schneider, T., Eichele, T., & Debener, S. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.01.015 · Cited by 364
Saccadic spike potentials in gamma-band EEG: Characterization, detection and suppression
Keren, A. S., Yuval-Greenberg, S., & Deouell, L. Y. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.057 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Joyce, C. A., Gorodnitsky, I. F., & Kutas, M.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 313-325
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2169064120
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00141.x
- The paper
- Joyce, C. A., Gorodnitsky, I. F., & Kutas, M. (2004). Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00141.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.