The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intentional modulation of emotional responding to unpleasant pictures: An ERP study
Abstract
Intentionally altering responses to unpleasant stimuli affects physiological and hemodynamic activity associated with emotional and cognitive processing. In the present experiment, we measured the late-positive potential (LPP) of the visually evoked event-related brain potential to examine the effects of intentional emotion modulation on electrophysiological correlates of emotional and cognitive processing. Seventeen participants received instructions to view, suppress, and enhance emotional responses to unpleasant stimuli. Results revealed significantly decreased electrophysiological activity during suppression of emotional responses beginning around 250 ms poststimulus and lasting several hundred milliseconds. These data suggest that ERPs are sensitive to emotion modulation/regulation processes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies showed decreased LPP amplitudes after suppression (e.g., [35]) and after reappraisal of negative emotional stimuli (e.g., [36,37,38] but see [39,40]).”
From Effects of differential strategies of emotion regulation (2019) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cites
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9 · Cited by 5,055
Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures
(2004) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2004.s209 · Cited by 4,665
The cognitive control of emotion
OCHSNER, K., & GROSS, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · Cited by 4,495
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
Ochsner, K. N., Ray, R. D., Cooper, J. C., Robertson, E. R., Chopra, S., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Gross, J. J. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.030 · Cited by 2,113
Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00044-7 · Cited by 1,900
Hiding feelings: The acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion
Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1997) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.106.1.95 · Cited by 1,834
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999) · Cited by 1,664
Emotional suppression: Physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior.
Gross, J. J., & LEVENSON, R. W. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.970 · Cited by 1,386
Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance
Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Cacioppo, J. T., Ito, T., & Lang, P. J. (2000) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720257 · Cited by 1,361
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cook E. W., 1999, VPM reference manual
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ochsner, K. N., Silvers, J. A., & Buhle, J. T. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06751.x · Cited by 1,879
Regulatory Flexibility: An Individual Differences Perspective on Coping and Emotion Regulation
Bonanno, G. A., & Burton, C. L. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613504116 · Cited by 1,676
Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings
Olofsson, J. K., Nordin, S., Sequeira, H., & Polich, J. (2008) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006 · Cited by 1,595
Event-Related Potentials, Emotion, and Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review
Hajcak, G., MacNamara, A., & Olvet, D. M. (2010) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565640903526504 · Cited by 1,370
Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures
Hajcak, G., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2006) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.6.4.291 · Cited by 613
Metadata
- Authors
- Moser, J. S., Hajcak, G., Bukay, E., & Simons, R. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Delaware (US)
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 292-296
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2142987371
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- emotion regulation, late positive potential, unpleasant pictures, event-related potentials, emotional processing, cognitive processes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
