Cited by 1,595Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and PerceptionAesthetic Perception and Analysis

Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings

Open access
Olofsson, Jonas K., Nordin, Steven, Sequeira, Henrique, Polich, John·2008·Biological Psychology

Abstract

The review summarizes and integrates findings from 40 years of event-related potential (ERP) studies using pictures that differ in valence (unpleasant-to-pleasant) and arousal (low-to-high) and that are used to elicit emotional processing. Affective stimulus factors primarily modulate ERP component amplitude, with little change in peak latency observed. Arousal effects are consistently obtained, and generally occur at longer latencies. Valence effects are inconsistently reported at several latency ranges, including very early components. Some affective ERP modulations vary with recording methodology, stimulus factors, as well as task-relevance and emotional state. Affective ERPs have been linked theoretically to attention orientation for unpleasant pictures at earlier components (<300 ms). Enhanced stimulus processing has been associated with memory encoding for arousing pictures of assumed intrinsic motivational relevance, with task-induced differences contributing to emotional reactivity at later components (>300 ms). Theoretical issues, stimulus factors, task demands, and individual differences are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of meditation experience on LPP amplitudes for unpleasant pictures was found at left and right frontal electrodes rather than at centro-parietal sites where it is generally reported.

    “On the one hand, Sobolewski and colleagues [25] found experienced Buddhist meditators to have attenuated LPP amplitudes for unpleasant pictures, but the effect was found at left and right frontal electrodes rather than at centro-parietal sites where it is generally reported [26].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cano ME, Polich J. Affective Visual Stimuli (IAPS) and ERPs: Valence, color, and control conditions; Paper presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society; San Francisco, CA. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kok A, Zeef EJ. Arousal and effort - a review and theoretical synthesis of studies of age-related-changes in event-related potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1991:324–341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Radilova J, Figar S, Radil T. Sexual arousal and visual perception. Activitas Nervosa Superior. 1983;25:168–170. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rozenkrants B, Polich J. IAPS and ERPs from an oddball task: strong arousal, weak valence, and minimal gender effects. 2007 Manuscript submitted for publication. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olofsson, J. K., Nordin, S., Sequeira, H., & Polich, J.
Affiliations
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Olofsson, Jonas K.
  • Polich, John
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
77
Issue
3
Pages
247-265
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975132501
Cited by
1,595
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 120 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 120 · 2014: 113 · 2013: 120 · 2012: 99
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA018262)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
affective picture processing, event-related potentials, emotional valence, emotional arousal, unpleasant pictures, attentional orienting, memory encoding, emotional reactivity, individual differences, task relevance
MeSH terms
Electroencephalography, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review