The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: Neural origins and plasticity
Open accessAbstract
Considerable progress has been made in our understanding of the remarkable fidelity with which the human auditory brainstem represents key acoustic features of the speech signal. The brainstem response to speech can be assessed noninvasively by examining scalp-recorded evoked potentials. Morphologically, two main components of the scalp-recorded brainstem response can be differentiated, a transient onset response and a sustained frequency-following response (FFR). Together, these two components are capable of conveying important segmental and suprasegmental information inherent in the typical speech syllable. Here we examine the putative neural sources of the scalp-recorded brainstem response and review recent evidence that demonstrates that the brainstem response to speech is dynamic in nature and malleable by experience. Finally, we propose a putative mechanism for experience-dependent plasticity at the level of the brainstem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006 · Cited by 2,256
Laver, J. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139166621 · Cited by 1,298
Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons
Ulanovsky, N., Las, L., & Nelken, I. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1032 · Cited by 1,049
Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns
Wong, P. C. M., Skoe, E., Russo, N. M., Dees, T., & Kraus, N. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1872 · Cited by 954
Self-citationDeficient brainstem encoding of pitch in children with autism spectrum disorders
Russo, N. M., Skoe, E., Trommer, B., Nicol, T., Zecker, S., Bradlow, A., & Kraus, N. (2008) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.108 · Cited by 223
Self-citation
Cited by
Music training for the development of auditory skills
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2882 · Cited by 1,115
Self-citationAuditory Brain Stem Response to Complex Sounds: A Tutorial
Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2010) · Ear & Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e3181cdb272 · Cited by 775
Self-citationWhy would Musical Training Benefit the Neural Encoding of Speech? The OPERA Hypothesis
Patel, A. D. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00142 · Cited by 703
Auditory processing in autism spectrum disorder: A review
O’Connor, K. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.008 · Cited by 466
Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG
Coffey, E. B. J., Herholz, S. C., Chepesiuk, A. M. P., Baillet, S., & Zatorre, R. J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11070 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Chandrasekaran, B., & Kraus, N.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-246
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2130304234
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: Neural origins and plasticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00928.x
- The paper
- Chandrasekaran, B., & Kraus, N. (2010). The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: Neural origins and plasticity. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00928.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
