CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 105African studies and sociopolitical issuesAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentLand Rights and Reforms

The Land Occupation Movement and Democratisation in Zimbabwe: Contradictions of Neoliberalism

Moyo, Sam·2001·Millennium: Journal of International Studies
DOI 10.1177/03058298010300021001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/03058298010300021001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The result has been a stark bifurcation of the national question: indigenous capital has confronted settler and foreign capital, transforming the meaning of 'national liberation' in its own terms and hijacking land reform, while historical realities of class and race persist, characterised by functional dualism within a white supremacist framework, including racialised landlordisms.

    “The result has been a stark bifurcation of the national question. On the one hand indigenous capital has confronted settler and foreign capital, transforming the meaning of 'national liberation' in its own terms and hijacking land reform, while on the other hand the historical realities of class and race persist, characterised by functional dualism within a white supremacist framework, including”

    From 1 - Land in the Political Economy of African Development: Alternative Strategies for Reform (2007) · cites this paper as Moyo 2001

  • Rural operations of civil society in Africa within a neo-liberal framework have been characterised by demands for funds for small-project 'development' aimed at a few selected beneficiaries, leaving a political and social vacuum in the leadership of the land reform agenda.

    “Rural operations of civil society in Africa within a neo-liberal framework have been characterised by demands for funds for small-project 'development' aimed at a few selected beneficiaries (Moyo 2002), leaving a political and social vacuum in the leadership of the land reform agenda (Moyo 2001).”

    From 1 - Land in the Political Economy of African Development: Alternative Strategies for Reform (2007) · cites this paper as Moyo 2001

  • Land occupation movements such as those in rural and urban Zimbabwe before and after the country's independence represent an unofficial or underground social pressure used to force land redistribution onto the policy agenda.

    “Land occupation movements such as those in rural and urban Zimbabwe before and after the country's independence represent an unofficial or underground social pressure used to force land redistribution onto the policy agenda (Moyo 2001).”

    From 1 - Land in the Political Economy of African Development: Alternative Strategies for Reform (2007) · cites this paper as Moyo 2001

  • The Land Apportionment Act of 1930 imposed racially segregated spatial planning on Zimbabwe, and this model was maintained into the post-independence phase.

    “Hence, segregated legislation, namely the Land Apportionment Act of 1930, was adopted in order to impose racially segregated spatial planning on the country. The segregated spatial planning model was maintained into the post-independence phase (Moyo, 2001: 7).”

    From Reflections on expropriation-based land reform in Southern Africa (2019) · cites this paper as Moyo, 2001: 7

  • In 1930, special designated areas were first established for emergent Black farmers; successful 'master' farmers were granted portions of land up to 100 hectares with the intent of developing a Black yeoman class.

    “In 1930, special designated areas were first established for emergent Black farmers; in this instance, successful 'master' farmers were granted portions of land up to 100 hectares with the intent of developing a Black yeoman class (Moyo, 2001: 17).”

    From Reflections on expropriation-based land reform in Southern Africa (2019) · cites this paper as Moyo, 2001: 17

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Moyo, S.
Affiliations
Southern African Regional Institute for Policy Studies, Harare, Zimbabwe
Corresponding author
Moyo, Sam
Venue
Millennium: Journal of International Studies
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2001-06
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
311-330
ISSN
  • 0305-8298 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9021
DOI
10.1177/03058298010300021001
OpenAlex
W2043208959
Cited by
104
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Millennium Journal of International Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African studies and sociopolitical issues
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
Keywords
democratization, neoliberalism, land reform, land redistribution, political economy of land, Zimbabwe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review