Cited by 47Preterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsInfant Development and Preterm Care

24 hour rhythm to the onset of preterm labour

Lindow, S. W., Jha, R. R., Thompson, J. W.·2000·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective To describe the time of onset of contractions which result in preterm delivery to investigate if there is a diurnal influence. Design The admission register for the neonatal unit was used to identify admissions for prematurity over a three‐year period. Obstetric case records were then reviewed to obtain the recorded time of onset of contractions when delivery was preceded by spontaneous labour. Setting A maternity hospital in the United Kingdom. Main outcome measures The time of onset of spontaneous contractions which result in preterm labour and delivery. Results Four hundred and twenty‐five women in preterm labour were studied. A significant diurnal rhythm in the timing of onset of contractions was noted with 42% of deliveries occurring in labour which commenced between midnight and 0600 hours. Subgroup analysis indicated that there was a significant rhythm in second trimester preterm labours, male and female babies and that this rhythm was present during both the winter and summer months. Conclusion The periodicity of preterm labour onset demonstrates a rhythm which is similar to the rhythm in the onset of labour at term. Preterm labour most commonly begins between midnight and 0600 hours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11114.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior studies on circadian patterns on the time of the onset of preterm labour provide conflicting results.

    “Prior studies on circadian patterns on the time of the onset of preterm labour provide conflicting results.34–36”

    From Triggers of Spontaneous Preterm Delivery – Why Today? (2014) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindow, S. W., Jha, R. R., & Thompson, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (GB)
  • University of Hull (GB)
Corresponding author
Lindow, S. W.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-09
Volume
107
Issue
9
Pages
1145-1148
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W1972714980
Cited by
47
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
preterm labour, diurnal cycle, circadian rhythm, spontaneous labor, preterm birth
MeSH terms
Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Labor Onset, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Male, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Seasons, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review