Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 665

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

STUDIES IN VIVO ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRAIN TRYPTOPHAN, BRAIN 5‐HT SYNTHESIS AND HYPERACTIVITY IN RATS TREATED WITH A MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITOR AND L‐TRYPTOPHAN

Grahame‐Smith, D. G.·1971·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Abstract— The effect of l‐tryptophan loading upon the amount of 5‐HT accumulating in the brains of rats pretreated with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor was studied. The amount of brain 5‐HT accumulated increased with increasing tryptophan dosages and brain tryptophan concentrations up to a tryptophan dose of 120 mg/kg body wt. and a brain tryptophan of about 70 μg/g brain. Above this dose and concentration no further increase in brain 5‐HT accumulation occurred. After monoamine oxidase inhibition and tryptophan loading gross hyperactivity and hyperpyrexia occurred. Monoamine oxidase inhibition, tryptophan administration and intact aromatic amino acid decarboxylase activity were all collectively essential for the production of hyperactivity and hyperpyrexia. DL‐Parachlorophenyl‐alanine prevented both the occurrence of hyperactivity and the increased accumulation of, brain 5‐HT. Indices of hyperactivity correlated with the amount of brain 5‐HT accumulating in 1 h after tryptophan loading but not with the overall concentration of brain 5‐HT, suggesting that hyperactivity was dependent upon the rate of 5‐HT synthesis. Reserpine and tetra‐benazine pretreatment speeded the onset and rate of development of the hyperactive state without altering the synthesis of brain 5‐HT. It is suggested that when monoamine oxidase is inhibited and the rate of 5‐HT synthesis is increased, granular uptake and storage of 5‐HT and other rate‐limiting mechanisms for 5‐HT inactivation are unable to prevent 5‐HT 'spilling over’to produce hyperactivity. The crucial dependence of 5‐HT synthesis upon brain tryptophan concentration and the ability of intraneuronal metabolism, when monoamine oxidase activity is intact, to cope with increased 5‐HT synthesis and prevent ‘spillover’, raise the possibility that brain 5‐HT synthesis is normally in excess of functional needs, and suggest that intraneuronal metabolism and the intraneuronal organization of 5‐HT pools are of more importance than synthesis in regulating the amount of 5‐HT available for functional activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1971.tb12034.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 665

Metadata

Authors
Grahame‐Smith, D. G.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1971-06
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
1053-1066
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2004895078
Cited by
665
References
16
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STUDIES IN VIVO ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRAIN TRYPTOPHAN, BRAIN 5‐HT SYNTHESIS AND HYPERACTIVITY IN RATS TREATED WITH A MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITOR AND L‐TRYPTOPHAN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1971.tb12034.x
The paper
Grahame‐Smith, D. G. (1971). STUDIES IN VIVO ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRAIN TRYPTOPHAN, BRAIN 5‐HT SYNTHESIS AND HYPERACTIVITY IN RATS TREATED WITH A MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITOR AND L‐TRYPTOPHAN. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1971.tb12034.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.