The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Vivo Regulation of [3H]Acetylcholine Recognition Sites in Brain by Nicotinic Cholinergic Drugs
Abstract
Abstract: The in vivo regulation of [3 H]acetylcholine ([3 H]ACh) recognition sites on nicotinic receptors in rat ‐ brain was examined by administering drugs that increase stimulation of nicotinic cholinergic receptors, either directly or indirectly. After 10 days of treatment with the cholinesterase inhibitor diisopropyl fluorophosphate, [3 H]ACh binding in the cortex, thalamus, striatum, and hypothalamus was decreased. Scatchard analyses indicated that the decrease in binding in the cortex was due to a reduction in the apparent density of [3 H]ACh recognition sites. In contrast, after repeated administration of nicotine (5–21 days), the number of [3 H]ACh recognition sites was increased in the cortex, thalamus, striatum, and hypothalamus. Similar effects were observed in the cortex and thalamus following repeated administration of the nicotinic agonist cytisin. The nicotinic antagonists mecamylamine and dihydro‐β‐erythroidine did not alter [3 H]ACh binding following 10–14 days of administration. Further, concurrent treatment with these antagonists and nicotine did not prevent the nicotine‐induced increase in these binding sites. The data indicate that [3 H]ACh recognition sites on nicotinic receptors are subject to up‐ and down‐regulation, and that repeated administration of nicotine results in a signal for up‐regulation, probably through protracted desensitization at the recognition site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptor Binding Sites in the Brain: Regulation in Vivo
Schwartz, R. D., & Kellar, K. J. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6828889 · Cited by 479
Self-citationThe effects of nicotine on locomotor activity in non‐tolerant and tolerant rats
Clarke, P. B. S., & Kumar, R. (1983) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1983.tb09398.x · Cited by 457
Ksir, C., Hakan, R., Hall, D. P., & Kellar, K. J. (1985) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/0028-3908(85)90058-9 · Cited by 204
Self-citation
Cited by
Mammalian nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: from structure to function
Albuquerque, E. X., Pereira, E. F. R., Alkondon, M., & Rogers, S. W. (2009) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00015.2008 · Cited by 1,724
Initial symptoms of nicotine dependence in adolescents
DiFranza, J. R. (2000) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.9.3.313 · Cited by 574
Evidence that Tobacco Smoking Increases the Density of (−)‐[3H]Nicotine Binding Sites in Human Brain
Benwell, M. E. M., Balfour, D. J. K., & Anderson, J. M. (1988) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb10600.x · Cited by 551
Desensitization of neuronal nicotinic receptors
Quick, M. W., & Lester, R. A. J. (2002) · Journal of Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/neu.10109 · Cited by 456
PICCIOTTO, M., ADDY, N., MINEUR, Y., & BRUNZELL, D. (2008) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.12.005 · Cited by 460
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, R. D., & Kellar, K. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 427-433
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W2102510891
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Regulation of [3H]Acetylcholine Recognition Sites in Brain by Nicotinic Cholinergic Drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1985.tb04005.x
- The paper
- Schwartz, R. D., & Kellar, K. J. (1985). In Vivo Regulation of [3H]Acetylcholine Recognition Sites in Brain by Nicotinic Cholinergic Drugs. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1985.tb04005.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.