Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of l‐[3H]Nicotine Binding in Human Cerebral Cortex: Comparison Between Alzheimer's Disease and the Normal

Flynn, Donna D., Mash, Deborah C.·1986·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Abstract: Putative nicotine receptors in the human cerebral cortex were characterized with l‐[3 H]nicotine. l‐[3 H]Nicotine binding was enhanced by the addition of Ca 2+ and abolished in the presence of Na 3 EDTA. Association and dissociation of the ligand were rapid at 25°C with t 1/2 values of 2 and 3 min, respectively. Saturation binding analysis revealed an apparent single class of sites with a dissociation constant of 5.6 n M and a Hill coefficient of 1.05. There was no effect of postmortem interval on the density of binding sites assayed up to 24 h in rat frontoparietal cortex. Nicotine binding in human cortical samples was also unaltered by increasing sampling delay. In human cortical membranes, binding site density decreased with normal aging. Receptor affinity and concentration in samples of frontal cortex (Brodmann area 10) from patients with Alzheimer's disease were comparable to age‐matched control values. Samples of infratemporal cortex (Brodmann area 38) from patients with Alzheimer's disease had a 50% reduction in the number of l‐[3 H]nicotine sites. Choline acetyltransferase activity was significantly decreased in both cortical areas. Enzyme activities in the temporal pole were reduced to 20% of control values. These data indicate that postsynaptic nicotine receptors are spared in the frontal cortex in Alzheimer's disease. In the infratemporal cortex, significant numbers of receptors remain despite the severe reduction in choline acetyltransferase activity. Replacement therapy directed at these sites may be warranted in Alzheimer's disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb13113.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Flynn, D. D., & Mash, D. C.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-12
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
1948-1954
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2111916837
Cited by
285
References
42
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of l‐[3H]Nicotine Binding in Human Cerebral Cortex: Comparison Between Alzheimer's Disease and the Normal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb13113.x
The paper
Flynn, D. D., & Mash, D. C. (1986). Characterization of l‐[3H]Nicotine Binding in Human Cerebral Cortex: Comparison Between Alzheimer's Disease and the Normal. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb13113.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.