The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of l‐[3H]Nicotine Binding in Human Cerebral Cortex: Comparison Between Alzheimer's Disease and the Normal
Abstract
Abstract: Putative nicotine receptors in the human cerebral cortex were characterized with l‐[3 H]nicotine. l‐[3 H]Nicotine binding was enhanced by the addition of Ca 2+ and abolished in the presence of Na 3 EDTA. Association and dissociation of the ligand were rapid at 25°C with t 1/2 values of 2 and 3 min, respectively. Saturation binding analysis revealed an apparent single class of sites with a dissociation constant of 5.6 n M and a Hill coefficient of 1.05. There was no effect of postmortem interval on the density of binding sites assayed up to 24 h in rat frontoparietal cortex. Nicotine binding in human cortical samples was also unaltered by increasing sampling delay. In human cortical membranes, binding site density decreased with normal aging. Receptor affinity and concentration in samples of frontal cortex (Brodmann area 10) from patients with Alzheimer's disease were comparable to age‐matched control values. Samples of infratemporal cortex (Brodmann area 38) from patients with Alzheimer's disease had a 50% reduction in the number of l‐[3 H]nicotine sites. Choline acetyltransferase activity was significantly decreased in both cortical areas. Enzyme activities in the temporal pole were reduced to 20% of control values. These data indicate that postsynaptic nicotine receptors are spared in the frontal cortex in Alzheimer's disease. In the infratemporal cortex, significant numbers of receptors remain despite the severe reduction in choline acetyltransferase activity. Replacement therapy directed at these sites may be warranted in Alzheimer's disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.939 · Cited by 27,915
Yung-Chi, C., & Prusoff, W. H. (1973) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2 · Cited by 12,922
Alzheimer's Disease and Senile Dementia: Loss of Neurons in the Basal Forebrain
Whitehouse, P., Price, D., Struble, R., Clark, A., Coyle, J., & DeLong, M. R. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7058341 · Cited by 3,627
NECROPSY EVIDENCE OF CENTRAL CHOLINERGIC DEFICITS IN SENILE DEMENTIA
Perry, E., Perry, R., Blessed, G., & Tomlinson, B. (1977) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91780-9 · Cited by 1,069
Clarke, P., Schwartz, R., Paul, S., Pert, C., & Pert, A. (1985) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.05-05-01307.1985 · Cited by 1,036
Fonnum, F. (1969) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj1150465 · Cited by 1,035
Arendt, T., Bigl, V., Arendt, A., & Tennstedt, A. (1983) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00697388 · Cited by 817
Mash, D. C., Flynn, D. D., & Potter, L. T. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3992249 · Cited by 698
Self-citationBondareff, W., Mountjoy, C. Q., & Roth, M. (1982) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.32.2.164 · Cited by 680
NEOCORTICAL CHOLINERGIC NEURONS IN ELDERLY PEOPLE
White, P., Goodhardt, M. J., Keet, J. P., Hiley, C. R., Carrasco, L. H., Williams, I. E. I., & Bowen, D. M. (1977) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92114-6 · Cited by 489
Cited by
The cholinergic system in aging and neuronal degeneration
Schliebs, R., & Arendt, T. (2011) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.058 · Cited by 1,047
Neuronal nicotinic receptors: from structure to pathology
Gotti, C., & Clementi, F. (2004) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.09.006 · Cited by 970
Bartus, R. T. (2000) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1006/exnr.2000.7397 · Cited by 829
Evidence that Tobacco Smoking Increases the Density of (−)‐[3H]Nicotine Binding Sites in Human Brain
Benwell, M. E. M., Balfour, D. J. K., & Anderson, J. M. (1988) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb10600.x · Cited by 551
Perry, E. K., Morris, C. M., Court, J. A., Cheng, A., Fairbairn, A. F., McKeith, I. G., Irving, D., Brown, A., & Perry, R. H. (1995) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(94)00410-7 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Flynn, D. D., & Mash, D. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1948-1954
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W2111916837
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of l‐[3H]Nicotine Binding in Human Cerebral Cortex: Comparison Between Alzheimer's Disease and the Normal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb13113.x
- The paper
- Flynn, D. D., & Mash, D. C. (1986). Characterization of l‐[3H]Nicotine Binding in Human Cerebral Cortex: Comparison Between Alzheimer's Disease and the Normal. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb13113.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.