A meta‐analytic study of the effects of female age on laying‐date and clutch‐size in the Great Tit Parus major and the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca
Abstract
The effects of age (1 year‐old vs older females) on laying‐date and clutch‐size of the Great Tit Parus major (in eight independent study areas) and the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca (five areas) were meta‐analysed using both published and unpublished records. To standardize comparisons between areas and species, the standardized difference between the means of the two age groups was used as a measure of the magnitude of the age‐effect (effect size). In Great Tits the laying‐date of ‘young’ females was 0.30 standard deviation units later and clutch‐size 0.31 units smaller than that of ‘old’ females. In the Pied Flycatcher the corresponding figures were 0.45 and 0.81, respectively. All the effect size measures were highly significant but for clutch‐size the effect size of the Pied Flycatcher was significantly greater than that of the Great Tit. In the Great Tit the effect size of clutch‐size was heterogeneous across the different study areas. It was estimated that the following numbers of unpublished studies showing null results would have to have accumulated in file‐drawers before we could say that the results concerning effect sizes are due to sampling bias: for Great Tits 121 studies of laying‐date and 196 studies of clutch‐size; and for Pied Flycatchers 45 studies of laying‐date and 139 studies of clutch‐size.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All of these elements have been the subject of conceptual exploration and formal methodological development in meta-analysis for many years.
“All of these elements have been the subject of conceptual exploration and formal methodological development in meta-analysis for many years 78 .”
From Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018) · cites this paper as [78]
Cites
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · see citing works
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
GLASS, G. V. (1976) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 · Cited by 4,890 · see citing works
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635 · see citing works
Meta-analysis in social research
(1982) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90011-8 · Cited by 3,896 · see citing works
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03396-0 · Cited by 2,549 · see citing works
Population Fluctuations and Clutch-Size in the Great Tit, Parus major L.
Perrins, C. M. (1965) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/2453 · Cited by 1,256 · see citing works
Lifetime Reproduction in Birds
Taylor, L. R., & Newton, I. (1990) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5045 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Comparing effect sizes of independent studies.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.92.2.500 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
WILKINSON, G. (1987) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0092-8240(87)90008-5 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Comparing effect sizes of independent studies.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.500 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
SURVIVAL OF YOUNG GREAT TITS IN RELATION TO AGE OF FEMALE PARENT
Perrins, C. M., & Moss, D. (1974) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1974.tb00242.x · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Der Trauerschnäpper(Muscicapa hypoleuca [Pallas])
Greutz, G. (1955) · Journal für Ornithologie · doi:10.1007/bf01968597 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Individual Variation in Seasonal Breeding Success of Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca)
Harvey, P., Stenning, M. J., & Campbell, B. (1985) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4486 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
The effect of old age on the reproduction of Great Tits Parus major and Blue Tits P. caeruleus
Dhondt, A. A. (1989) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1989.tb02770.x · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Clutch‐size variation in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca
JÄRVINEN, A. (1989) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1989.tb04792.x · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S., & Stewart, G. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25753 · Cited by 1,709 · see citing works
Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution
Arnqvist, G., & Wooster, D. (1995) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89073-4 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Gurevitch, J., Curtis, P. S., & Jones, M. H. (2001) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(01)32013-5 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Wallace, B. C., Lajeunesse, M. J., Dietz, G., Dahabreh, I. J., Trikalinos, T. A., Schmid, C. H., & Gurevitch, J. (2017) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12708 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Meta-analytic insights into evolutionary ecology: an introduction and synthesis
Nakagawa, S., & Poulin, R. (2012) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-012-9593-z · Cited by 77 · see citing works
- Authors
- JARVINEN, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Corresponding author
- JARVINEN, ANTERO
- Venue
- Ibis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-67
- ISSN
- 0019-1019 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-919X
- OpenAlex
- W2122326897
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ibis (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- laying date, clutch size, Parus major, Ficedula hypoleuca, avian reproduction, sampling bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review