Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High oxidative damage levels in the longest‐living rodent, the naked mole‐rat

Andziak, Blazej, O’Connor, Timothy P., Qi, Wenbo, DeWaal, Eric M., Pierce, Anson, Chaudhuri, Asish R., Van Remmen, Holly, Buffenstein, Rochelle·2006·Aging Cell

Abstract

Summary: Oxidative stress is reputed to be a significant contributor to the aging process and a key factor affecting species longevity. The tremendous natural variation in maximum species lifespan may be due to interspecific differences in reactive oxygen species generation, antioxidant defenses and/or levels of accrued oxidative damage to cellular macromolecules (such as DNA, lipids and proteins). The present study tests if the exceptional longevity of the longest living (> 28.3 years) rodent species known, the naked mole‐rat (NMR, Heterocephalus glaber), is associated with attenuated levels of oxidative stress. We compare antioxidant defenses (reduced glutathione, GSH), redox status (GSH/GSSG), as well as lipid (malondialdehyde and isoprostanes), DNA (8‐OHdG), and protein (carbonyls) oxidation levels in urine and various tissues from both mole‐rats and similar‐sized mice. Significantly lower GSH and GSH/GSSG in mole‐rats indicate poorer antioxidant capacity and a surprisingly more pro‐oxidative cellular environment, manifested by 10‐fold higher levels of in vivo lipid peroxidation. Furthermore, mole‐rats exhibit greater levels of accrued oxidative damage to lipids (twofold), DNA (~two to eight times) and proteins (1.5 to 2‐fold) than physiologically age‐matched mice, and equal to that of same‐aged mice. Given that NMRs live an order of magnitude longer than predicted based on their body size, our findings strongly suggest that mechanisms other than attenuated oxidative stress explain the impressive longevity of this species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00237.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Andziak, B., O’Connor, T. P., Qi, W., DeWaal, E. M., Pierce, A., Chaudhuri, A. R., Van Remmen, H., & Buffenstein, R.
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-10-20
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
463-471
ISSN
  • 1474-9718 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-9726
OpenAlex
W2102653023
Cited by
351
References
2
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High oxidative damage levels in the longest‐living rodent, the naked mole‐rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00237.x
The paper
Andziak, B., O’Connor, T. P., Qi, W., DeWaal, E. M., Pierce, A., Chaudhuri, A. R., Van Remmen, H., & Buffenstein, R. (2006). High oxidative damage levels in the longest‐living rodent, the naked mole‐rat. Aging Cell. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00237.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.