Cited by 142Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsDNA Repair MechanismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

The oxidative DNA lesions 8,5′-cyclopurines accumulate with aging in a tissue-specific manner

Open access
Wang, Jin, Clauson, Cheryl L., Robbins, Paul D., Niedernhofer, Laura J., Wang, Yinsheng·2012·Aging Cell

Abstract

Summary: Accumulation of DNA damage is implicated in aging. This is supported by the fact that inherited defects in DNA repair can cause accelerated aging of tissues. However, clear‐cut evidence for DNA damage accumulation in old age is lacking. Numerous studies report measurement of DNA damage in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from tissues of young and old organisms, with variable outcomes. Variability results from genetic differences between specimens or the instability of some DNA lesions. To control these variables and test the hypothesis that elderly organisms have more oxidative DNA damage than young organisms, we measured 8,5′‐cyclopurine‐2′‐deoxynucleosides (cPu), which are relatively stable, in tissues of young and old wild‐type and congenic progeroid mice. We found that cPu accumulate spontaneously in the nuclear DNA of wild‐type mice with age and to a greater extent in DNA repair–deficient progeroid mice, with a similar tissue‐specific pattern (liver > kidney > brain). These data, generated under conditions where genetic and environmental variables are controlled, provide strong evidence that DNA repair mechanisms are inadequate to clear endogenous lesions over the lifespan of mammals. The similar, although exaggerated, results obtained from progeroid, DNA repair–deficient mice and old normal mice support the conclusion that DNA damage accumulates with, and likely contributes to, aging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00828.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ercc1 / D mice accumulate oxidative DNA damage faster than wild-type mice.

    “accumulate oxidative DNAdamagefasterthanwild-typemice”

    From Cellular Senescence: Defining a Path Forward (2019) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2012

    The Abstract (page not provided) reports greater accumulation of oxidative cPu lesions in Ercc1−/Δ mice and a faster increase in their kidneys from 10 to 21 weeks. The claim is too broad: the increase was similar to wild-type mice in liver, while cPu levels decreased with age in Ercc1−/Δ brains. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Clauson, C. L., Robbins, P. D., Niedernhofer, L. J., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Yinsheng
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-22
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
714-716
ISSN
  • 1474-9718 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-9726
OpenAlex
W1554622477
Cited by
142
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG024827)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA101864, P30CA047904)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES016114)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
oxidative DNA damage, aging, DNA repair deficiency, progeroid mice, tissue-specific accumulation, nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Brain, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Endonucleases, Female, Kidney, Liver, Male, Purines, Mice, Knockout, Aging, Premature, Mice, Congenic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review