Cited by 436Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology

Open access

McAlinden, Colm, Khadka, Jyoti, Pesudovs, Konrad·2011·Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

DOI 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Citation information : McAlinden C, Khadka J & Pesudovs K. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011, 31 , 330–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‐1313.2011.00851.x The ever‐expanding choice of ocular metrology and imaging equipment has driven research into the validity of their measurements. Consequently, studies of the agreement between two instruments or clinical tests have proliferated in the ophthalmic literature. It is important that researchers apply the appropriate statistical tests in agreement studies. Correlation coefficients are hazardous and should be avoided. The ‘limits of agreement’ method originally proposed by Altman and Bland in 1983 is the statistical procedure of choice. Its step‐by‐step use and practical considerations in relation to optometry and ophthalmology are detailed in addition to sample size considerations and statistical approaches to precision (repeatability or reproducibility) estimates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/096228029900800204 · Cited by 9,619
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.
Lin, L. I.-K. (1989) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532051 · Cited by 8,785
The Analysis of Variance
Scheffé, H. (1960) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196006000-00016 · Cited by 5,625
Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1983) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2987937 · Cited by 4,300
Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry
Schwab, J. J. (1968) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(68)71813-2 · Cited by 1,291
Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry
Shrout, P. E. (1998) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/096228029800700306 · Cited by 1,211
Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance
Kramer, M. S., & Feinstein, A. R. (1981) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.1981.18 · Cited by 1,087
Improving the Reliability of the Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Test
Bullimore, M. A., Elliott, D. B., & Bailey, I. L. (1991) · Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System · doi:10.1364/navs.1991.md12 · Cited by 257

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

10.1097/00006324-200407000-00018 · DOI
10.1046/j.1475-1313.2000.00497.x · DOI

Sorted by citations

Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes
Armstrong, R. A. (2012) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.12009 · Cited by 538
Measuring diaphragm thickness with ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility, reproducibility and validity
Goligher, E. C., Laghi, F. A., Detsky, M. E., Farias, P., Murray, A., Brace, D., Brochard, L. J., Sebastien-Bolz, S., Rubenfeld, G. D., Kavanagh, B. P., et al. (2015) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3687-3 · Cited by 451
Erratum to: Measuring diaphragm thickness with ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility, reproducibility and validity
Goligher, E. C., Laghi, F., Detsky, M. E., Farias, P., Murray, A., Brace, D., Brochard, L. J., Bolz, S.-S., Rubenfeld, G. D., Kavanagh, B. P., et al. (2015) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3724-2 · Cited by 315
Sample Size for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Measurement by Bland−Altman Method
Lu, M., Zhong, W.-H., Liu, Y., Miao, H., Li, Y., & Ji, M. (2016) · The International Journal of Biostatistics · doi:10.1515/ijb-2015-0039 · Cited by 307
Comparison of subjective grading and objective assessment in meibography
Pult, H., & Riede-Pult, B. H. (2012) · Contact Lens and Anterior Eye · doi:10.1016/j.clae.2012.10.074 · Cited by 277
Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) studies and sample-size calculation
McAlinden, C., Khadka, J., & Pesudovs, K. (2015) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.029 · Cited by 248
Self-citation
Reporting Standards for a Bland–Altman Agreement Analysis: A Review of Methodological Reviews
Gerke, O. (2020) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics10050334 · Cited by 246
A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Precision (Repeatability and Reproducibility) of the Oculus Pentacam HR
McAlinden, C., Khadka, J., & Pesudovs, K. (2011) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-7093 · Cited by 236
Self-citation
Corneal Deformation Measurement Using Scheimpflug Noncontact Tonometry
Hon, Y., & Lam, A. K. C. (2012) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0b013e318279eb87 · Cited by 235
Exact Parametric Confidence Intervals for Bland‐Altman Limits of Agreement
Carkeet, A. (2015) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000000513 · Cited by 216
Should Pearson's correlation coefficient be avoided?
Armstrong, R. A. (2019) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.12636 · Cited by 203
Repeatability and Reproducibility of Noninvasive Keratograph 5M Measurements in Patients with Dry Eye Disease
Tian, L., Qu, J., zhang, X.-Y., & Sun, X. (2016) · Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1155/2016/8013621 · Cited by 188
Radiomic signature of 18F fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for prediction of gastric cancer survival and chemotherapeutic benefits
Jiang, Y., Yuan, Q., Lv, W., Xi, S., Huang, W., Sun, Z., Chen, H., Zhao, L., Liu, W., Hu, Y., et al. (2018) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.28018 · Cited by 125
Choroidal Thickness and Volume in Healthy Young White Adults and the Relationships between them and Axial Length, Ammetropy and Sex
Sánchez-Cano, A. I., Orduna, E., Segura, F. J., FUENTE, C. L. D. L., Cuenca, N., Abecia, E., & Pinilla, I. (2014) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.05.035 · Cited by 114
Repeatability of Foveal Measurements Using Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Segmentation Software
Ctori, I., & Huntjens, B. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129005 · Cited by 112
The effect of topical atropine on the choroidal thickness of healthy children
Zhang, Z., Zhou, Y., Xie, Z., Chen, T., Gu, Y., Lu, S., & Wu, Z. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep34936 · Cited by 111
The Effect of Cycloplegia on the Lenstar and the IOLMaster Biometry
Huang, J., McAlinden, C., Su, B., Pesudovs, K., Feng, Y., Hua, Y., Yang, F., Pan, C., Zhou, H., & Wang, Q. (2012) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0b013e3182772f4f · Cited by 104
Self-citation
Aberrations and Topography in Normal, Keratoconus‐Suspect, and Keratoconic Eyes
Gordon‐Shaag, A., Millodot, M., Ifrah, R., & Shneor, E. (2012) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0b013e318249d727 · Cited by 101
Repeatability of the Pentacam HR in Various Grades of Keratoconus
Kreps, E. O., Jiménez‐García, M., Issarti, I., Claerhout, I., Koppen, C., & Rozema, J. J. (2020) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.013 · Cited by 92
Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Agreement Between Three Different Scheimpflug Systems in Measuring Corneal and Anterior Segment Biometry
Hernández‐Camarena, J. C., Chirinos‐Saldaña, P., Navas, A., Ramírez-Miranda, A., Mota, A. D. L., Jiménez-Corona, A., & Graue-Hernández, E. O. (2014) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081597x-20140815-02 · Cited by 90
VISUAL FUNCTION MEASURES IN EARLY AND INTERMEDIATE AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION
Chandramohan, A., Stinnett, S. S., Petrowski, J. T., Schuman, S. G., Toth, C. A., Cousins, S. W., & Lad, E. M. (2016) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0000000000001002 · Cited by 89
Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry
Huang, J., Chen, H., Li, Y., Chen, Z., Gao, R., Yu, J., Zhao, Y., Lu, W., McAlinden, C., & Wang, Q. (2019) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081597x-20190109-01 · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Preoperative Radiomic Approach to Evaluate Tumor-Infiltrating CD8+ T Cells in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Using Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography
Liao, H., Zhang, Z., Chen, J., Liao, M., Xu, L., Wu, Z., Yuan, K., Song, B., & Zeng, Y. (2019) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-019-07815-9 · Cited by 90
Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) vs other treatment modalities for glaucoma: systematic review
McAlinden, C. (2013) · Eye · doi:10.1038/eye.2013.267 · Cited by 87
Self-citation
Scheimpflug–Placido topographer and optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer: Repeatability and agreement
Chen, W., McAlinden, C., Pesudovs, K., Wang, Q., Lü, F., Feng, Y., Chen, J., & Huang, J. (2012) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.031 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Preliminary Report on a Novel Virtual Reality Perimeter Compared With Standard Automated Perimetry
Razeghinejad, R., Gonzalez-Garcia, A., Myers, J. S., & Katz, L. J. (2020) · Journal of Glaucoma · doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000001670 · Cited by 81
Evaluation of a new rebound tonometer for self-measurement of intraocular pressure
Dabasia, P. L., Lawrenson, J. G., & Murdoch, I. (2015) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307674 · Cited by 81
Reproducibility of Optical Coherence Tomography Measurements in Children
Altemir, I., Pueyo, V., Elía, N., Polo, V., Larrosa, J. M., & Oros, D. (2012) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2012.06.012 · Cited by 76
Overview of the Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Agreement of the Biometry Values Provided by Various Ophthalmic Devices
Rozema, J. J., Wouters, K., Mathysen, D. G. P., & Tassignon, M. (2014) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.08.014 · Cited by 76
Axial Length Measurement Failure Rates With Biometers Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Compared to Partial-Coherence Interferometry and Optical Low-Coherence Interferometry
McAlinden, C., Wang, Q., Gao, R., Zhao, W., Yu, A., Li, Y., Guo, Y., & Huang, J. (2016) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.019 · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Axial Length Measurement Failure Rates with the IOLMaster and Lenstar LS 900 in Eyes with Cataract
McAlinden, C., Wang, Q., Pesudovs, K., Yang, X., Bao, F., Yu, A., Lin, S., Feng, Y., & Huang, J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128929 · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Repeatability of automated measurements by a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer and biometer and agreement with standard devices
Schiano‐Lomoriello, D., Hoffer, K. J., Abicca, I., & Savini, G. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79674-4 · Cited by 69
The development and evaluation of the new Ocular Surface Disease Index-6
Pult, H., & Wolffsohn, J. S. (2019) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2019.08.008 · Cited by 67
Statistical comparative study between the conventional DPPH spectrophotometric and dropping DPPH analytical method without spectrophotometer: Evaluation for the advancement of antioxidant activity analysis
Sridhar, K., & Charles, A. L. (2019) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.110 · Cited by 65
The effects of induced oblique astigmatism on symptoms and reading performance while viewing a computer screen
Rosenfield, M., Hue, J. E., Huang, R., & Bababekova, Y. (2011) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00887.x · Cited by 64
Measurement of Intraocular Pressure by Patients With Glaucoma
Pronin, S., Brown, L., Megaw, R. D., & Tatham, A. J. (2017) · JAMA Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.3151 · Cited by 61
Reference values, intertest correlations, and test-retest repeatability of selected tear film tests in healthy cats
Sebbag, L., Kass, P. H., & Maggs, D. J. (2015) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.246.4.426 · Cited by 60
Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non‐contact biometric devices in myopes
Zhao, J., Chen, Z., Zhou, Z., Ding, L., & Zhou, X. (2012) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00793.x · Cited by 59
Systematic review and meta‐analysis on the agreement of non‐cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in children
Wilson, S., Ctori, I., Shah, R., Suttle, C., & Conway, M. L. (2022) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.13022 · Cited by 61
The Quality of Vision Questionnaire
McAlinden, C., Skiadaresi, E., Gatinel, D., Cabot, F. A., Huang, J., & Pesudovs, K. (2013) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0b013e3182993856 · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Subjective Quality of Vision Before and After Cataract Surgery
Skiadaresi, E., McAlinden, C., Pesudovs, K., Polizzi, S., Khadka, J., & Ravalico, G. (2012) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1603 · Cited by 57
Self-citation
In vivo assessment of macula in eyes of healthy children 8 to 16 years old using optical coherence tomography angiography
Zhang, Z., Huang, X., Meng, X., Chen, T., Gu, Y., Wu, Y., & Wu, Z. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08174-9 · Cited by 57
Blue‐blocking Filters and Digital Eyestrain
Palavets, T., & Rosenfield, M. (2018) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000001318 · Cited by 57
Investigation of Tear Osmolarity Using the TearLab Osmolarity System in Normal Adults in Saudi Arabia
Masmali, A. M., Alrabiah, S. A., Alharbi, A., El-Hiti, G. A.-R., & Almubrad, T. (2014) · Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1097/icl.0000000000000002 · Cited by 56
Precision and agreement of higher order aberrations measured with ray tracing and Hartmann-Shack aberrometers
Xu, Z., Hua, Y., Qiu, W., Li, G., & Wu, Q. E. (2018) · BMC Ophthalmology · doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0683-8 · Cited by 55
Confidence and coverage for Bland–Altman limits of agreement and their approximate confidence intervals
Carkeet, A., & Goh, Y. T. (2016) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280216665419 · Cited by 54
Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies
Montés‐Micó, R. (2021) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000690 · Cited by 53
Comparison of Horizontal Corneal Diameter Measurements Using the Orbscan IIz and Pentacam HR Systems
Salouti, R., Nowroozzadeh, M. H., Zamani, M., Ghoreyshi, M., & Khodaman, A. R. (2013) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/ico.0b013e3182a40786 · Cited by 52
Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes
Hua, Y., Qiu, W., Xiao, Q., & Wu, Q. E. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193023 · Cited by 51
Comparing accommodative function between the dominant and non-dominant eye
Momeni‐Moghaddam, H., McAlinden, C., Azimi, A., Sobhani, M., & Skiadaresi, E. (2013) · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-013-2480-7 · Cited by 50
Self-citation
Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept-source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters
Ferrer‐Blasco, T., Domínguez‐Vicent, A., Esteve-Taboada, J. J., Aloy, M. Á., Adsuara, J. E., & Montés‐Micó, R. (2016) · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-016-3555-z · Cited by 50
Agreement of ocular biometric measurements in young healthy eyes between IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000
Liao, X., Peng, Y., Liu, B., Tan, Q., & Lan, C. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59919-y · Cited by 48
Aqueous tear assessment in dogs: Impact of cephalic conformation, inter‐test correlations, and test‐retest repeatability
Bolzanni, H., Oriá, A. P., Raposo, A. C., & Sebbag, L. (2020) · Veterinary Ophthalmology · doi:10.1111/vop.12751 · Cited by 46
Contrast sensitivity and higher-order aberrations in Keratoconus subjects
Shneor, E., Pinero, D. P., & Doron, R. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92396-5 · Cited by 46
Precision of higher-order aberration measurements with a new Placido-disk topographer and Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor
López‐Miguel, A., Martínez-Almeída, L., González-García, M. J., Coco-Martín, M. B., Sobrado‐Calvo, P., & Maldonado, M. J. (2012) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.061 · Cited by 46
Lack of agreement between different observers and methods in the measurement of capillary refill time in healthy volunteers: an observational study
Valenzuela, E. D., Welsh, S., & Dubín, A. (2014) · Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva · doi:10.5935/0103-507x.20140038 · Cited by 45
Heidelberg Anterion Swept-Source OCT Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping: Repeatability and Agreement With Optovue Avanti
Feng, Y., Reinstein, D. Z., Nitter, T., Archer, T. J., McAlinden, C., Chen, X., Bertelsen, G., Utheim, T. P., & Stojanović, A. (2022) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081597x-20220414-01 · Cited by 44
Self-citation
Self-measurement with Icare HOME tonometer, patients’ feasibility and acceptability
Cvenkel, B., Velkovska, M. A., & Jordanova, V. D. (2019) · European Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1177/1120672118823124 · Cited by 44
A double-blind test of blue-blocking filters on symptoms of digital eye strain
Rosenfield, M., Li, R. T., & Kirsch, N. T. (2020) · Work · doi:10.3233/wor-203086 · Cited by 44
Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Rasch Analysis of the Visual Function (VF-14) Questionnaire
Khadka, J., Huang, J., Mollazadegan, K., Gao, R., Chen, H., Zhang, S., Wang, Q., & Pesudovs, K. (2014) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.14-14017 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
Device interchangeability on anterior chamber depth and white-to-white measurements: a thorough literature review
Domínguez‐Vicent, A., Pérez‐Vives, C., Ferrer‐Blasco, T., García‐Lázaro, S., & Montés‐Micó, R. (2016) · International Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.18240/ijo.2016.07.20 · Cited by 43
Comparison of Two Main Orthokeratology Lens Designs in Efficacy and Safety for Myopia Control
Lu, W., Ning, R., Diao, K., Ding, Y., Chen, R., Zhou, L., Lian, Y., McAlinden, C., Sanders, F., Xia, F., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.798314 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Assessment of Tear Film Quality among Smokers Using Tear Ferning Patterns
Masmali, A. M., Al-Shehri, A., Alanazi, S. A., Abusharaha, A., Fagehi, R. A., & El-Hiti, G. A.-R. (2016) · Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1155/2016/8154315 · Cited by 42
Assessment of subjective refraction with a clinical adaptive optics visual simulator
Hervella, L., Villegas, E. A., Prieto, P. M., & Artal, P. (2018) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.08.022 · Cited by 42
An eye on the Shih Tzu dog: Ophthalmic examination findings and ocular surface diagnostics
Sebbag, L., Silva, A. P. S. M., Santos, Á. P. B., Raposo, A. C., & Oriá, A. P. (2022) · Veterinary Ophthalmology · doi:10.1111/vop.13022 · Cited by 42
Evaluation of the precision of contrast sensitivity function assessment on a tablet device
Dörr, M., Lesmes, L. A., Elze, T., Wang, H., Lu, Z., & Bex, P. J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46706 · Cited by 41
Contrast sensitivity measured by two different test methods in healthy, young adults with normal visual acuity
Koefoed, V. F., Baste, V., Roumes, C., & Høvding, G. (2014) · Acta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1111/aos.12487 · Cited by 39
Proptosis—Correlation and Agreement between Hertel Exophthalmometry and Computed Tomography
Ramli, N. M., Kala, S., Samsudin, A., Rahmat, K., & Abidin, Z. Z. (2015) · Orbit · doi:10.3109/01676830.2015.1057291 · Cited by 38
Agreement of white-to-white measurements with swept-source OCT, Scheimpflug and color LED devices
Tañá‐Rivero, P., Aguilar-Córcoles, S., Rodríguez‐Prats, J. L., Montés‐Micó, R., & Ruíz-Mesa, R. (2020) · International Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s10792-020-01552-9 · Cited by 38
Enhancement in the limit of detection of lab‐on‐chip microfluidic devices using functional nanomaterials
Vaishampayan, V., Kapoor, A., & Gumfekar, S. P. (2023) · The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cjce.24915 · Cited by 37
Measurement properties of continuous text reading performance tests
Brussee, T., van Nispen, R. M. A., & van Rens, G. H. M. B. (2014) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.12158 · Cited by 37
A comparison of the reliability of dynamic retinoscopy and subjective measurements of amplitude of accommodation
León, A., Medrano, S. M., & Rosenfield, M. (2012) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00891.x · Cited by 37
Investigation of Ocular Tear Ferning in Controlled and Uncontrolled Diabetic Subjects
Masmali, A. M., Maeni, Y. A., El-Hiti, G. A.-R., Murphy, P. J., & Almubrad, T. (2017) · Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1097/icl.0000000000000419 · Cited by 37
Repeatability and Diurnal Variation of Tear Ferning Test
Masmali, A. M., Albahlal, J. M., El-Hiti, G. A.-R., Akhtar, S., Purslow, C., Murphy, P. J., & Almubrad, T. (2015) · Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1097/icl.0000000000000116 · Cited by 35
Comparison between Findings in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and in Fluorescein Angiography in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy
Enders, C., Baeurle, F., Lang, G. E., Dreyhaupt, J., Lang, G. K., Loidl, M., & Werner, J. U. (2019) · Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1159/000499114 · Cited by 35
A descriptive study of samples sizes used in agreement studies published in the PubMed repository
Han, O., Tan, H. W., Julious, S. A., Sutton, L., Jacques, R., Lee, E. C., Lewis, J., & Walters, S. J. (2022) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-022-01723-5 · Cited by 34
Repeatability and agreement of ocular biometry measurements: Aladdin versus Lenstar
McAlinden, C., Gao, R., Yu, A., Wang, X., Yang, J., Yu, Y., Chen, H., Wang, Q., & Huang, J. (2017) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309365 · Cited by 34
Self-citation
The acute effect of a single dose of green tea on the quality and quantity of tears in normal eye subjects
Masmali, A. M., Alanazi, S. A., Alotaibi, A. G., Fagehi, R. A., Abusharaha, A., & El-Hiti, G. A.-R. (2019) · Clinical ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s201127 · Cited by 33
Ocular biometric repeatability using a new high-resolution swept-source optical coherence tomographer
Ruíz-Mesa, R., Aguilar-Córcoles, S., Montés‐Micó, R., & Tañá‐Rivero, P. (2020) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2020.1772050 · Cited by 33
Precision of a new ocular biometer in eyes with cataract using swept source optical coherence tomography combined with Placido-disk corneal topography
Wang, W., Miao, Y., Savini, G., McAlinden, C., Chen, H., Hu, Q., Wang, Q., & Huang, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13800-7 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Comparing Autorefractors for Measurement of Accommodation
Aldaba, M., López, S. G., Vilaseca, M., Pujol, J., & Arjona, M. (2015) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000000685 · Cited by 32
Repeatability of ocular aberration measurements in patients with keratoconus
Jinabhai, A. N., Radhakrishnan, H., & O’Donnell, C. (2011) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00868.x · Cited by 32
Repeatability and reproducibility of a new optical biometer in normal and keratoconic eyes
Yağcı, R., Güler, E., Kulak, A. E., Erdoğan, B. D., Balcı, M., & Hepşen, İ. F. (2014) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.039 · Cited by 32
Acceptability and Concordance of Self- Versus Clinician- Sampling for HPV Testing among Rural South Indian Women
Madhivanan, P., Nishimura, H., Ravi, K., Pope, B., Coudray, M., Arun, A., Krupp, K., Jayakrishna, P., & Srinivas, V. (2021) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.31557/apjcp.2021.22.3.971 · Cited by 31
“This was consistent with recommendations from McAlinden et al that sample sizes for agreement studies should include at least 100 subjects(McAlinden et al., 2011).”
Method
Comparative analysis of corneal measurements obtained from a S cheimpflug camera and an integrated P lacido‐optical coherence tomography device in normal and keratoconic eyes
Viswanathan, D., Kumar, N. L., Males, J. J., & Graham, S. L. (2014) · Acta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1111/aos.12622 · Cited by 31
OPD-Scan III: a repeatability and inter-device agreement study of a multifunctional device in emmetropia, ametropia, and keratoconus
Asgari, S., Hashemi, H., Jafarzadehpur, E., Mohamadi, A., Rezvan, F., & Fotouhi, A. (2016) · International Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s10792-016-0189-4 · Cited by 31
A comparison of plusoptiX A12 measurements with cycloplegic refraction
Fogel-Levin, M., Doron, R., Wygnanski-Jaffe, T., Ancri, O., & Ben-Zion, I. (2016) · Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2016.04.006 · Cited by 31
Non-invasive measurements of the dynamic changes in the ciliary muscle, crystalline lens morphology, and anterior chamber during accommodation with a high-resolution OCT
Esteve-Taboada, J. J., Domínguez‐Vicent, A., Monsálvez-Romín, D., Águila‐Carrasco, A. J. D., & Montés‐Micó, R. (2017) · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-017-3663-4 · Cited by 31
CHOROIDAL THICKNESS AND VOLUME IN A HEALTHY PEDIATRIC POPULATION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH AGE, AXIAL LENGTH, AMETROPIA, AND SEX
Herrera, L., NAVARRO, I. P., Sánchez-Cano, A. I., Pérez-García, D., Remón, L., Almenara, C., Caramello, C., Cristóbal, J. Á., & Pinilla, I. (2015) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0000000000000636 · Cited by 30
Validation of refraction and anterior segment parameters by a new multi-diagnostic platform (VX120)
Gordon‐Shaag, A., Pinero, D. P., Kahloun, C., Markov, D., Parnes, T., Gantz, L., & Shneor, E. (2018) · Journal of Optometry · doi:10.1016/j.optom.2017.12.003 · Cited by 30
REPRODUCIBILITY AND COMPARISON OF VISUAL ACUITY OBTAINED WITH SIGHTBOOK MOBILE APPLICATION TO NEAR CARD AND SNELLEN CHART
Phung, L., Gregori, N. Z., Ortiz, A. G., Shi, W., & Schiffman, J. (2015) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0000000000000818 · Cited by 30
The Italian Catquest-9SF cataract questionnaire: translation, validation and application
Skiadaresi, E., Ravalico, G., Polizzi, S., Lundström, M., González‐Andrades, M., & McAlinden, C. (2016) · Eye and Vision · doi:10.1186/s40662-016-0043-9 · Cited by 30
Self-citation
The interaction between homatropine and optical blur on choroidal thickness
Sander, B. P., Collins, M. J., & Read, S. A. (2018) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.12450 · Cited by 30
Manufacturer changes lead to clinically important differences between two editions of the TNO stereotest
van Doorn, L. L. A., Evans, B. J. W., Edgar, D. F., & Fortuin, M. F. (2013) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.12101 · Cited by 29
A method for quantitative measurement of lumbar intervertebral disc structures: an intra- and inter-rater agreement and reliability study
Tunset, A., Kjær, P., Chreiteh, S. S., & Jensen, T. S. (2013) · Chiropractic & Manual Therapies · doi:10.1186/2045-709x-21-26 · Cited by 29
Corneal aberrations measured with a high-resolution Scheimpflug tomographer: repeatability and reproducibility
McAlinden, C., Schwiegerling, J. T., Khadka, J., & Pesudovs, K. (2020) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000084 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Orthokeratology and Contact Lens Quality of Life Questionnaire (OCL-QoL)
McAlinden, C., & Lipson, M. J. (2017) · Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1097/icl.0000000000000451 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Reproducibility of multifocal visual evoked potential and traditional visual evoked potential in normal and multiple sclerosis eyes
Narayanan, D., Cheng, H., Tang, R. A., & Frishman, L. J. (2014) · Documenta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1007/s10633-014-9467-5 · Cited by 27
Comparison of keratometry measurements using the P entacam HR , the O rbscan IIz, and the TMS ‐4 topographer
Tajbakhsh, Z., Salouti, R., Nowroozzadeh, M. H., Mohammad, A. A., Tabatabaee, S., & Zamani, M. (2012) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00942.x · Cited by 27
Rasch analysis of three dry eye questionnaires and correlates with objective clinical tests
McAlinden, C., Gao, R., Wang, Q., Zhu, S., Yang, J., Yu, A., Bron, A. J., & Huang, J. (2017) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.01.005 · Cited by 27
Self-citation

Authors: McAlinden, C., Khadka, J., & Pesudovs, K.
Affiliations: Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author: McAlinden, Colm
ORCID: McAlinden, Colm
Khadka, Jyoti
Pesudovs, Konrad
Venue: Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2011-05-26
Volume: 31
Issue: 4
Pages: 330-338
ISSN: 0275-5408 (ISSN-L)
1475-1313
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x
OpenAlex: W2126376404
Cited by: 436
References: 49
Citations by year: 2026: 22 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
FWCI: 5.01
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Keywords: repeatability, reproducibility, limits of agreement, correlation coefficient, ophthalmic instruments, sample size, measurement precision, optometry
MeSH terms: Humans, Ophthalmology, Optometry, Vision, Ocular, Reproducibility of Results, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks