Cited by 436Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology

Open access

McAlinden, Colm, Khadka, Jyoti, Pesudovs, Konrad·2011·Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

DOI 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Citation information : McAlinden C, Khadka J & Pesudovs K. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011, 31 , 330–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‐1313.2011.00851.x The ever‐expanding choice of ocular metrology and imaging equipment has driven research into the validity of their measurements. Consequently, studies of the agreement between two instruments or clinical tests have proliferated in the ophthalmic literature. It is important that researchers apply the appropriate statistical tests in agreement studies. Correlation coefficients are hazardous and should be avoided. The ‘limits of agreement’ method originally proposed by Altman and Bland in 1983 is the statistical procedure of choice. Its step‐by‐step use and practical considerations in relation to optometry and ophthalmology are detailed in addition to sample size considerations and statistical approaches to precision (repeatability or reproducibility) estimates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/096228029900800204 · Cited by 9,619
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.
Lin, L. I.-K. (1989) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532051 · Cited by 8,785
The Analysis of Variance
Scheffé, H. (1960) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196006000-00016 · Cited by 5,625
Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1983) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2987937 · Cited by 4,300
Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry
Schwab, J. J. (1968) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(68)71813-2 · Cited by 1,291
Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry
Shrout, P. E. (1998) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/096228029800700306 · Cited by 1,211
Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance
Kramer, M. S., & Feinstein, A. R. (1981) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.1981.18 · Cited by 1,087
Improving the Reliability of the Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Test
Bullimore, M. A., Elliott, D. B., & Bailey, I. L. (1991) · Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System · doi:10.1364/navs.1991.md12 · Cited by 257

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

10.1097/00006324-200407000-00018 · DOI
10.1046/j.1475-1313.2000.00497.x · DOI

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 433

Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems
Calvo-Sanz, J. A., Portero-Benito, A., & Puente, A. A. (2018) · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-018-3909-9 · Cited by 27
The effect of cycloplegia on biometric measurements using swept‐source optical coherence tomography‐based biometry
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Yenerel, N. M. (2019) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/cxo.12888 · Cited by 26
Angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur distance analysis with high-resolution optical coherence tomography
Montés‐Micó, R., Tañá‐Rivero, P., Aguilar-Córcoles, S., Ruiz-Santos, M., Rodríguez-Carrillo, M. D., & Ruíz-Mesa, R. (2020) · Eye and Vision · doi:10.1186/s40662-020-00208-0 · Cited by 26
Repeatability of whole-cornea measurements using a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer
Tañá‐Rivero, P., Aguilar-Córcoles, S., Ruíz-Mesa, R., & Montés‐Micó, R. (2020) · European Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1177/1120672120944022 · Cited by 26
Reliability of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer in Healthy Children, Adults, and Cataract Patients
Huang, J., Zhao, Y., Savini, G., Yu, G., Yu, J., Chen, Z., Tu, R., & Zhao, Y. (2020) · Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1155/2020/8946364 · Cited by 25
Age- and refraction-related changes in anterior segment anatomical structures measured by swept-source anterior segment OCT
Xie, X., Corradetti, G., Song, A. E., Pardeshi, A. A., Sultan, W., Lee, J. Y., Yu, F., Zhang, L., Chen, S., Chopra, V., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240110 · Cited by 25
Item Banking Enables Stand‐Alone Measurement of Driving Ability
Khadka, J., Fenwick, E., Lamoureux, E. L., & Pesudovs, K. (2016) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000000958 · Cited by 25
Self-citation
Cambridge Colour Test: reproducibility in normal trichromats
Fernandes, T. P., dos Santos, N. A., & Paramei, G. V. (2020) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.380306 · Cited by 24
Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia
Wang, X., McAlinden, C., Zhang, H., Yan, J. R., Wang, D., Wei, W., & Mi, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80915-9 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Agreement between intraoperative anterior segment spectral-domain OCT and 2 swept-source OCT biometers
Tañá-Sanz, P., Ruiz-Santos, M., Rodríguez-Carrillo, M. D., Aguilar-Córcoles, S., Montés‐Micó, R., & Tañá‐Rivero, P. (2021) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2021.1905518 · Cited by 24
Comparison of preoperative angle kappa measurements in the eyes of cataract patients obtained from Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry, and ray-tracing aberrometry
Qin, M., Yuan, Y., Wang, Y., Li, P., Chen, W., Wang, Y., Yang, M., Wu, J., Ji, M., Luo, J., et al. (2022) · BMC Ophthalmology · doi:10.1186/s12886-021-02116-w · Cited by 24
Associations between accommodative dynamics, heart rate variability and behavioural performance during sustained attention: A test-retest study
Redondo, B., Vera, J., Luque‐Casado, A., García‐Ramos, A., & Jiménez, R. (2019) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2019.07.001 · Cited by 27
Forecasting Progressive Trends in Keratoconus by Means of a Time Delay Neural Network
Jiménez‐García, M., Issarti, I., Kreps, E. O., Dhubhghaill, S. N., Koppen, C., Varssano, D., Rozema, J., & on behalf of The REDCAKE Study Group (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10153238 · Cited by 23
Femtosecond Laser–assisted LASIK Improves Quality of Life
Meidani, A., Tzavara, C. K., Dimitrakaki, C., Pesudovs, K., & Tountas, Y. (2012) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081597x-20120403-01 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Intra‐ and inter‐ examiner repeatability of cycloplegic retinoscopy among young children
McCullough, S. J., Doyle, L. A., & Saunders, K. J. (2016) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.12341 · Cited by 22
Effect of six different autorefractor designs on the precision and accuracy of refractive error measurement
Venkataraman, A. P., Brautaset, R., & Domínguez‐Vicent, A. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0278269 · Cited by 22
The effect of pupillary dilatation on IOL power measurement by using the IOLMaster
Khambhiphant, B., Chatbunchachai, N., & Pongpirul, K. (2015) · International Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s10792-015-0063-9 · Cited by 22
Agreement between a partial coherence interferometer and 2 manual keratometers
Bullimore, M. A., Büehren, T., & Bissmann, W. (2013) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.034 · Cited by 22
First clinical results on the feasibility, quality and reproducibility of aberrometry-based intraoperative refraction during cataract surgery
Huelle, J. O., Katz, T. R., Druchkiv, V., Pahlitzsch, M., Steinberg, J., Richard, G. W., & Linke, S. J. (2014) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304786 · Cited by 22
Interchangeability among five devices that measure anterior eye distances
Domínguez‐Vicent, A., Pérez‐Vives, C., Ferrer‐Blasco, T., Albarrán‐Diego, C., & Montés‐Micó, R. (2015) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/cxo.12247 · Cited by 21
Comparison of anterior segment measurements with optical low-coherence reflectometry and rotating dual Scheimpflug analysis
Huerva, V., Ascaso, F. J., Soldevila, J., & Lavilla, L. (2014) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.045 · Cited by 21
Reproducibility of optical quality parameters measured at objective and subjective best focuses in a double-pass system.
Hu, A., Qiao, L.-Y., Zhang, Y., Cai, X., Li, L., & Wan, X. H. (2015) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.05.34 · Cited by 21
Corneal Power Measurement Obtained by Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Wang, Q., Hua, Y., Savini, G., Chen, H., Bao, F., Lin, S., Lu, W., & Huang, J. (2015) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000000564 · Cited by 21
Image-guided lens extraction surgery: a systematic review
Panagiotopoulou, E.-K., Ntonti, P., Gkika, M. G., Konstantinidis, A., Perente, İ., Dardabounis, D., Ioannakis, K., & Labiris, G. (2019) · International Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.18240/ijo.2019.01.21 · Cited by 21
Repeatability of quantitative measurements of retinal layers with SD-OCT and agreement between vertical and horizontal scan protocols in healthy eyes
Domínguez-Vicent, A., Brautaset, R., & Venkataraman, A. P. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221466 · Cited by 21
Scleral shape and its correlation with corneal parameters in keratoconus
Dhaese, S. E., Kreps, E. O., & Consejo, A. (2020) · Contact Lens and Anterior Eye · doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.08.010 · Cited by 21
Effect of age in the ciliary muscle during accommodation: Sectorial analysis
Domínguez‐Vicent, A., Monsálvez-Romín, D., Esteve-Taboada, J. J., Montés‐Micó, R., & Ferrer‐Blasco, T. (2018) · Journal of Optometry · doi:10.1016/j.optom.2018.01.001 · Cited by 20
Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements With a Dual Scheimpflug Placido Corneal Topographer and a New Partial Coherence Interferometer in Keratoconic Eyes
Yağc, R., Kulak, A. E., Güler, E., Tenlik, A., Gürağaç, F. B., & Hepşen, İ. F. (2015) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000000480 · Cited by 20
Assessment of the tear film in normal eye subjects after consumption of a single dose of hot peppermint drink
Masmali, A. M., Alanazi, S. A., Almagren, B., & El-Hiti, G. A.-R. (2019) · Clinical Optometry · doi:10.2147/opto.s206904 · Cited by 20
Comparison between logbook-reported and objectively-assessed physical activity and sedentary time in breast cancer patients: an agreement study
Mazzoni, A., Nordin, K., Berntsen, S., Demmelmaier, I., & Igelström, H. (2017) · BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s13102-017-0072-2 · Cited by 23
Evaluation of the Performance of Algorithm-Based Methods for Subjective Refraction
Venkataraman, A. P., Sirak, D., Brautaset, R., & Domínguez‐Vicent, A. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9103144 · Cited by 19
The influence of a mineral oil cationic nanoemulsion or perfluorohexyloctane on the tear film lipid layer and higher order aberrations
Habbe, K. J., Фрингс, А., Saad, A., & Geerling, G. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279977 · Cited by 19
Steps towards Smarter Solutions in Optometry and Ophthalmology—Inter-Device Agreement of Subjective Methods to Assess the Refractive Errors of the Eye
Ohlendorf, A., Leube, A., & Wahl, S. (2016) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare4030041 · Cited by 19
Agreement of white-to-white measurements with the IOLMaster 700, Atlas 9000, and Sirius systems
Ferrer‐Blasco, T., Esteve-Taboada, J. J., Martínez-Albert, N., Alfonso, J. F., & Montés‐Micó, R. (2018) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2018.1481745 · Cited by 19
Comparison of two portable clinical analyzers to one stationary analyzer for the determination of blood gas partial pressures and blood electrolyte concentrations in horses
Kirsch, K., Detilleux, J., Serteyn, D., & Sandersen, C. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211104 · Cited by 19
The correlation of radial peripapillary capillary density measurements with optic nerve head morphology and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in healthy eyes
Özcan, Y., Özçalışkan, Ş., Balci, S. Y., & Artunay, Ö. (2020) · Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102008 · Cited by 19
Influence of trifocal intraocular lenses on standard autorefraction and aberrometer-based autorefraction
Garzón, N., García‐Montero, M., López‐Artero, E., Poyales, F., & Albarrán‐Diego, C. (2019) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.04.017 · Cited by 19
Comparability and repeatability of different methods of corneal astigmatism assessment
Ferreira, T. B., & Ribeiro, F. J. (2017) · Clinical ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s146730 · Cited by 18
Repeated Same-Day Versus Single Tomography Measurements of Keratoconic Eyes for Analysis of Disease Progression
Wonneberger, W., Sterner, B., MacLean, U., Claesson, M., & Zetterberg, M. (2018) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000001513 · Cited by 18
Impact of Lens Material on Objective Refraction in Eyes with Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses
Garzón, N., Poyales, F., García‐Montero, M., Vega, F., Millán, M. S., & Albarrán‐Diego, C. (2021) · Current Eye Research · doi:10.1080/02713683.2021.1946563 · Cited by 18
Effectiveness of Smartphone Devices in Promoting Physical Activity and Exercise in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review
Martínez-García, M. D. M., Ruiz-Cárdenas, J. D., & Rabinovich, R. (2017) · COPD Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.1080/15412555.2017.1358257 · Cited by 18
Validity of automated refraction after segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation
Albarrán‐Diego, C., Muñoz, G., Rohrweck, S., García‐Lázaro, S., & Albero, J. R. (2017) · International Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.18240/ijo.2017.11.15 · Cited by 18
Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements Obtained by Three Different Devices in Healthy Eyes
FUENTE, C. L. D. L., Sánchez-Cano, A. I., Segura, F. J., & Pinilla, I. (2014) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2014/498080 · Cited by 18
Accuracy and reliability of self-administered visual acuity tests: Systematic review of pragmatic trials
Thirunavukarasu, A. J., Hassan, R., Limonard, A., & Savant, S. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0281847 · Cited by 18
Diagnostic accuracy of a non-invasive spot-check hemoglobin meter, Masimo Rad-67® pulse CO-Oximeter®, in detection of anemia in antenatal care settings in Kenya
Koech, A. C., Mwaniki, I. G., Mutunga, J. M., Mukhanya, M. W., Mwadime, E., Ochieng, M. C., Mwashigadi, G., Mistry, H. D., Craik, R., von Dadelszen, P., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Global Women s Health · doi:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1427261 · Cited by 17
Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Agreement of Two Scheimpflug-Placido Anterior Corneal Analyzers for Posterior Corneal Surface Measurement
Bao, F., Savini, G., Shu, B., Zhu, S., Gao, R., Dang, G., Yu, A., Wang, Q., & Huang, J. (2017) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081597x-20170606-01 · Cited by 17
Validation of an Objective Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Binocular Accommodative Facility
Vera, J., Redondo, B., Molina, R., Koulieris, G. A., & Jiménez, R. (2019) · Current Eye Research · doi:10.1080/02713683.2019.1688837 · Cited by 17
How representative is the ‘Representative Value’ of refraction provided by the S hin‐ N ippon NV ision‐K 5001 autorefractor?
Tang, W. C., Tang, Y. Y., & Lam, C. S. Y. (2013) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.12098 · Cited by 17
Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity screening with a new iPad application
Rodríguez‐Vallejo, M., Llorens‐Quintana, C., Furlan, W. D., & Monsoriu, J. A. (2016) · Displays · doi:10.1016/j.displa.2016.06.001 · Cited by 17
Reliability of iCare ic100 Rebound Tonometry and Agreement With Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Healthy and Post-myopic LASIK Patients
Gómez-Gómez, A., Talens‐Estarelles, C., Alcocer-Yuste, P., & Nieto, J. C. (2021) · Journal of Glaucoma · doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000001878 · Cited by 16
Repeatability of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and agreement with a low coherence reflectometry biometer
Domínguez‐Vicent, A., Venkataraman, A. P., Dalin, A., Brautaset, R., & Montés‐Micó, R. (2023) · Eye and Vision · doi:10.1186/s40662-023-00343-4 · Cited by 16
Association between Contrast Sensitivity and Reading with Macular Pathology
Brussee, T., Berg, T., van Nispen, R. M. A., de Boer, I., & van Rens, G. H. M. B. (2018) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000001178 · Cited by 16
Comparison of two devices to simulate vision with intraocular lenses
Wahl, S., Song, C., & Ohlendorf, A. (2019) · Clinical ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s188890 · Cited by 16
Cup‐to‐disc and arteriole‐to‐venule ratios in children aged 6–7 and 12–13 years
McClelland, J. F., O’Donoghue, L., McIntyre, M., & Saunders, K. J. (2011) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00878.x · Cited by 16
Electrophysiological findings in long-term type 1 diabetes patients without diabetic retinopathy using different ERG recording systems
Arias‐Álvarez, M., Tomás‐Grasa, C., Sopeña‐Pinilla, M., Fernández‐Espinosa, G., Alonso, S. B., Acha, J., Mena, D. R., & Pinilla, I. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54099-5 · Cited by 15
Repeatability and agreement of two anterior segment OCT in myopic patients before implantable collamer lenses implantation
Zhang, X.-F. (2020) · International Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.18240/ijo.2020.04.15 · Cited by 15
Effect of Instrument Design and Technique on the Precision and Accuracy of Objective Refraction Measurement
Domínguez‐Vicent, A., Al‐Soboh, L., Brautaset, R., & Venkataraman, A. P. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9103061 · Cited by 15
Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry
Güler, E., Kulak, A. E., Totan, Y., Yuvarlak, A., & Hepşen, İ. F. (2016) · Contact Lens and Anterior Eye · doi:10.1016/j.clae.2016.06.001 · Cited by 15
Intereye Symmetry in Bietti Crystalline Dystrophy
Liu, Z., Ayton, L. N., O’Hare, F., Arslan, J., Hu, M. L., Noar, A. P., Wang, J.-H., Hickey, D. G., McGuinness, M. B., Vincent, A. L., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2021.07.009 · Cited by 14
Measurements of Anterior and Posterior Corneal Curvatures with OCT and Scheimpflug Biometers in Patients with Low Total Corneal Astigmatism
Muzyka−Woźniak, M., Oleszko, A., & Grzybowski, A. E. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11236921 · Cited by 14
Repeatability assessment of anterior segment measurements in myopic patients using an anterior segment OCT with placido corneal topography and agreement with a swept-source OCT
Wang, H., Zhu, L., Pang, C., & Fan, Q. (2024) · BMC Ophthalmology · doi:10.1186/s12886-024-03448-z · Cited by 14
Effect of photorefractive keratectomy on agreement of anterior segment variables obtained by a swept-source biometer vs a Scheimpflug-based tomographer
Salouti, R., Kamalipour, A., Masihpour, N., Zamani, M., Ghoreyshi, M., Salouti, K., & Nowroozzadeh, M. H. (2020) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000252 · Cited by 14
Assessment of anterior segment measurements using a high-resolution imaging device
Montés‐Micó, R., Tañá‐Rivero, P., Aguilar-Córcoles, S., & Ruíz-Mesa, R. (2020) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2020.1816463 · Cited by 14
Ocular surface physiology and aqueous tear secretion in cats of diverse cephalic conformations
Oksa-Minalto, J., Maggs, D. J., Akimova, J., Ilgaža, A., & Sebbag, L. (2022) · Veterinary Ophthalmology · doi:10.1111/vop.13051 · Cited by 14
A prospective evaluation of the repeatability of left ventricular ejection fraction measurement by gated SPECT
Kliner, D., Wang, L., Winger, D. G., Follansbee, W. P., & Soman, P. (2015) · Journal of Nuclear Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s12350-015-0071-1 · Cited by 14
Repeatability of Ocular Measurements with a Dual-Scheimpflug Analyzer in Healthy Eyes
FUENTE, C. L. D. L., Sánchez-Cano, A. I., Segura, F. J., Fuentes‐Broto, L., & Pinilla, I. (2014) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2014/808646 · Cited by 14
The measurement properties of mentoring relationship quality scales for mentoring programs
Ferro, A., Wells, S., Speechley, K. N., Lipman, E., & DeWit, D. (2014) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0392-8 · Cited by 13
Agreement of predicted intraocular lens power using swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry
Tañá-Sanz, P., Rodríguez-Carrillo, M. D., Ruiz-Santos, M., Montés‐Micó, R., Ruíz-Mesa, R., & Tañá‐Rivero, P. (2021) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2021.2008908 · Cited by 13
Statistical Perspectives on Reproducibility: Definitions and Challenges
Simkus, A., Coolen‐Maturi, T., Coolen, F. P. A., & Bendtsen, C. (2025) · Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice · doi:10.1007/s42519-025-00459-x · Cited by 14
Comparison of specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and after cataract surgery
López‐Miguel, A., Sanchidrián, M., Fernández, I., Holgueras, A., & Maldonado, M. J. (2016) · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-016-3537-1 · Cited by 13
Repeatability and agreement of intraocular pressure measurement among three tonometers
pavón, I. S., Cañadas, P., & Martín, R. (2020) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/cxo.13043 · Cited by 13
Effect of orthokeratology on precision and agreement assessment of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer
Shu, B., Bao, F., Savini, G., Lu, W., Tu, R., Chen, H., Song, B., Wang, Q., & Huang, J. (2020) · Eye and Vision · doi:10.1186/s40662-020-00177-4 · Cited by 13
Pyramidal Aberrometry in Wavefront-Guided Myopic LASIK
Фрингс, А., Hassan, H., & Allan, B. D. (2020) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081597x-20200519-03 · Cited by 13
Comparison, within-session repeatability and normative data of three phoria tests
Facchin, A., & Maffioletti, S. (2020) · Journal of Optometry · doi:10.1016/j.optom.2020.05.007 · Cited by 13
Comparison of physiognomy and frame angle parameters using different devices to prescribe progressive addition lenses
Espinilla, O. G., Gallegos-Cocho, I., Sánchez, I., Cañadas, P., & Martín, R. (2021) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1080/08164622.2021.1914511 · Cited by 13
Yoga for Healthy Aging: Science or Hype?
Madhivanan, P., Krupp, K., Waechter, R. L., & Shidhaye, R. R. (2021) · Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research · doi:10.20900/agmr20210016 · Cited by 13
An evaluation of the IOLMaster 700 and its agreement with the IOLMaster v3 in children
Leighton, R. E., Breslin, K. M. M., Saunders, K. J., & McCullough, S. J. (2021) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.12918 · Cited by 13
The 17-Item Computer Vision Symptom Scale Questionnaire (CVSS17): Translation, Validation and Reliability of the Italian Version
Rossi, G. C. M., Bettio, F., González‐Pérez, M., Briola, A., Pasinetti, G. L. M., & Scudeller, L. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19052517 · Cited by 13
Accuracy of wavefront aberrometer refraction vs manifest refraction in cataract patients: impact of age, ametropia and visual function
Huelle, J. O., Katz, T. R., Draeger, J., Pahlitzsch, M., Druchkiv, V., Steinberg, J., Richard, G. W., & Linke, S. J. (2013) · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-012-2246-7 · Cited by 13
Ocular anatomic changes for different accommodative demands using swept-source optical coherence tomography: a pilot study
Esteve-Taboada, J. J., Ferrer‐Blasco, T., Aloy, M. Á., Adsuara, J. E., Cerdá-Durán, P., Mimica, P., & Montés‐Micó, R. (2017) · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-017-3801-z · Cited by 13
Repeatability assessment of anterior segment biometric measurements under accommodative and nonaccommodative conditions using an anterior segment OCT
Martínez-Albert, N., Esteve-Taboada, J. J., & Montés‐Micó, R. (2017) · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-017-3832-5 · Cited by 13
Analysis of Intrasession Repeatability of Ocular Aberrometric Measurements and Validation of Keratometry Provided by a New Integrated System in Mild to Moderate Keratoconus
Pinero, D. P., Soto-Negro, R., Ruiz-Fortes, P., Pérez-Cambrodí, R. J., & Fukumitsu, H. (2019) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000002034 · Cited by 13
Associations Between Spatial and Temporal Contrast Sensitivity and Reading
Brussee, T., Berg, T., van Nispen, R. M. A., & van Rens, G. H. M. B. (2016) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000001030 · Cited by 13
Fiabilité et reproductibilité des mesures de la pression intraoculaire par le tonomètre Icare® Home (modèle TA022) et comparaison avec les mesures au tonomètre à aplanation de Goldmann chez des patients glaucomateux
Valero, B., Fénolland, J.-R., Rosenberg, R., Sendon, D., Mesnard, C., Sigaux, M., Giraud, J., & Renard, J. P. (2017) · Journal Français d Ophtalmologie · doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2017.06.008 · Cited by 13
Precision of a new SS-OCT biometer to measure anterior segment parameters and agreement with 3 instruments with different measurement principles
Venkataraman, A. P., Domínguez‐Vicent, A., Selin, P., Brautaset, R., & Montés‐Micó, R. (2023) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001380 · Cited by 12
A metrological approach to the analysis of choroidal thickness by optical coherence tomography 3D scans in myopia research
Breher, K., Ohlendorf, A., & Wahl, S. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56915-9 · Cited by 12
Change in optical axial length after cataract surgery: segmental method vs composite method
Goto, S., Maeda, N., Noda, T., Ohnuma, K., Iehisa, I., Koh, S., & Nishida, K. (2020) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000149 · Cited by 12
Performance of a new device for the clinical determination of light discomfort
Montés‐Micó, R., Cerviño, A., Martínez-Albert, N., García‐Marqués, J. V., & Marié, S. (2020) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2020.1837623 · Cited by 12
Agreement and variability of subjective refraction, autorefraction, and wavefront aberrometry in pseudophakic patients
Ruiß, M., Findl, O., Draschl, P., Harrer, A., & Hirnschall, N. D. (2021) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000583 · Cited by 12
Comparative accuracy of two veterinary‐calibrated point‐of‐care glucometers for measurement of blood glucose concentration in dogs
Wolfenden, G., James, F., Hung, L. H. T., Bruce, M., & Thompson, M. (2022) · Journal of Small Animal Practice · doi:10.1111/jsap.13491 · Cited by 12
Prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data
Hernández, C. S., Gil, A., Casares, I., Poderoso, J., Wehse, A., Dave, S. R., Lim, D., Sánchez-Montañés, M. A., & Lage, E. (2022) · Journal of Optometry · doi:10.1016/j.optom.2022.03.001 · Cited by 12
Macular retinal thickness and flow density change by optical coherence tomography angiography after posterior scleral reinforcement
Qiao, L.-Y., Zhang, X., Jan, C., Li, X., Li, M., & Wang, H. (2019) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-018-9484-6 · Cited by 12
Changes in symmetry of anterior chamber following routine cataract surgery in non-glaucomatous eyes
Lee, H., Zukaite, I., Juniat, V. A. R., Dimitry, M. E. S., Lewis, A., & Nanavaty, M. A. (2019) · Eye and Vision · doi:10.1186/s40662-019-0144-3 · Cited by 12
Choroidal Differences between Spectral and Swept-source Domain Technologies
Pinilla, I., Sánchez-Cano, A. I., Insa, G., Bartolomé, I., Perdices, L., & Orduna, E. (2020) · Current Eye Research · doi:10.1080/02713683.2020.1795883 · Cited by 12
Agreement Between Angle-to-Angle Distance and Aqueous Depth Obtained With Two Different Optical Coherence Tomographers and a Scheimpflug Camera
Tañá‐Rivero, P., Rodríguez-Carrillo, M. D., Ruiz-Santos, M., García-Tomás, B., & Montés‐Micó, R. (2021) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081597x-20201013-01 · Cited by 11
Horizontal and anterior chamber diameter for phakic intraocular lens sizing
Oleszko, A., Marek, J., & Muzyka−Woźniak, M. (2020) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/cxo.13101 · Cited by 11
Accuracy of image analysis for linear zoometric measurements in dromedary camels
Gherissi, D. E., Lamraoui, R., Chacha, F., & Gaouar, S. B. S. (2022) · Tropical Animal Health and Production · doi:10.1007/s11250-022-03242-3 · Cited by 11
Intrasession Repeatability and Intersession Reproducibility Measurements Using VX120 Multidiagnostic Unit
Sánchez, I., Ortiz-Toquero, S., & Martín, R. (2018) · Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1097/icl.0000000000000486 · Cited by 11
Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy
Kortuem, C., Marx, T., Altpeter, E. K., Trauzettel‐Klosinski, S., & Kuester-Gruber, S. (2020) · Ophthalmic Research · doi:10.1159/000509687 · Cited by 11
Validation of the visual acuity iPad app Eye Chart Pro compared to the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart in a low-vision population
Hazari, H., Curtis, R., Eden, K., Hopman, W. M., Irrcher, I., & Bona, M. D. (2020) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x20960640 · Cited by 11

Authors: McAlinden, C., Khadka, J., & Pesudovs, K.
Affiliations: Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author: McAlinden, Colm
ORCID: McAlinden, Colm
Khadka, Jyoti
Pesudovs, Konrad
Venue: Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2011-05-26
Volume: 31
Issue: 4
Pages: 330-338
ISSN: 0275-5408 (ISSN-L)
1475-1313
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x
OpenAlex: W2126376404
Cited by: 436
References: 49
Citations by year: 2026: 22 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
FWCI: 5.01
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Keywords: repeatability, reproducibility, limits of agreement, correlation coefficient, ophthalmic instruments, sample size, measurement precision, optometry
MeSH terms: Humans, Ophthalmology, Optometry, Vision, Ocular, Reproducibility of Results, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks