Impacts of land management on fluxes of trace greenhouse gases
Abstract
Abstract. Land use change and land management practices affect the net emissions of the trace gases methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O), as well as carbon sources and sinks. Changes in CH 4 and N 2 O emissions can substantially alter the overall greenhouse gas balance of a system. Drainage of peatlands for agriculture or forestry generally increases N 2 O emission as well as that of CO 2 , but also decreases CH 4 emission. Intermittent drainage or late flooding of rice paddies can greatly diminish the seasonal emission of CH 4 compared with continuous flooding. Changes in N 2 O emissions following land use change from forest or grassland to agriculture vary between climatic zones, and the net impact varies with time. In many soils, the increase in carbon sequestration by adopting no‐till systems may be largely negated by associated increases in N 2 O emission. The promotion of carbon credits for the no‐till system before we have better quantification of its net greenhouse gas balance is naïve. Applying nitrogen fertilizers to forests could increase the forest carbon sink, but may be accompanied by a net increase in N 2 O; conversely, adding lime to acid forest soils can decrease the N 2 O emission.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reduced tillage may increase N2O emissions due to decreased soil aeration and higher soil moisture contents.
“Reduced tillage may, however, increase N 2 O emissions due to decreased soil aeration and higher soil moisture contents (Aulakh et al., 1984;Linn & Doran, 1984;Smith & Conen, 2004;Rochette, 2008).”
From Land‐use change to bioenergy production in <scp>E</scp> urope: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon (2012) · cites this paper as Smith & Conen, 2004
N2O emissions increase with conversion of conventional tillage land to no-till.
“It has often been observed that N2O emissions increase with conversion of conventional tillage land to no-till (Six et al. 2004, Smith and Conen 2004).”
From LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF NET GREENHOUSE-GAS FLUX FOR BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS (2007) · cites this paper as Smith and Conen 2004
Cites
Aulakh, M. S., Rennie, D. A., & Paul, E. A. (1984) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq1984.00472425001300010024x · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector
Herrero, M., Henderson, B., Havlík, P., Thornton, P. K., Conant, R. T., Smith, P., Wirsenius, S., Hristov, A. N., Gerber, P., Gill, M., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2925 · Cited by 1,045 · see citing works
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF NET GREENHOUSE-GAS FLUX FOR BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS
Adler, P. R., Grosso, S. J. D., & Parton, W. J. (2007) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/05-2018 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Don, A., Osborne, B., Hastings, A., Skiba, U., Carter, M. S., Drewer, J., Flessa, H., Freibauer, A., Hyvönen, N., Jones, M. B., et al. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x · Cited by 363 · see citing works
HUANG, Y., & TANG, Y. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02187.x · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Zona, D., Janssens, I. A., Aubinet, M., Gioli, B., Vicca, S., Fichot, R., & Ceulemans, R. (2013) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.10.008 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Behnke, G. D., David, M. B., & Voigt, T. B. (2012) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9191-5 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Gauder, M., Butterbach‐Bahl, K., Graeff‐Hönninger, S., Claupein, W., & Wiegel, R. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01135.x · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Soil carbon, soil nitrate, and soil emissions of nitrous oxide during cultivation of energy crops
Hellebrand, H. J., Strähle, M., Scholz, V., & Kern, J. (2010) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-009-9326-z · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smith, K. A., & Conen, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Venue
- Soil Use and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 255-263
- ISSN
- 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2743
- OpenAlex
- W2047132925
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Use and Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Keywords
- land management, greenhouse gas fluxes, methane emissions, nitrous oxide emissions, land use change, peatland drainage, intermittent drainage, no-tillage, soil carbon sequestration, forest carbon sink, nitrogen fertilization, liming, carbon credits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review