The DOI matches its Crossref record; 305 of the 309 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 153 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: Scale and hierarchy must be incorporated into any conceptual framework for the study of macroevolution, i.e. evolution above the species level. Expansion of temporal and spatial scales reveals evolutionary patterns and processes that are virtually inaccessible to, and unpredictable from, short‐term, localized observations. These larger‐scale phenomena range from evolutionary stasis at the species level and the mosaic assembly of complex morphologies in ancestral forms to the non‐random distribution in time and space of the origin of major evolutionary novelties, as exemplified by the Cambrian explosion and post‐extinction recoveries of metazoans, and the preferential origin of major marine groups in onshore environments and tropical waters. Virtually all of these phenomena probably involve both ecological and developmental factors, but the integration of these components with macroevolutionary theory has only just begun. Differential survival and reproduction of units can occur at several levels within a biological hierarchy that includes DNA sequences, organisms, species and clades. Evolution by natural selection can occur at any level where there is heritable variation that affects birth and death of units by virtue of interaction with the environment. This dynamic can occur when selfish DNA sequences replicate disproportionately within genomes, when organisms enjoy fitness advantages within populations (classical Darwinian selection), when differential speciation or extinction occurs within clades owing to organismic properties (effect macroevolution), and when differential speciation or extinction occurs within clades owing to emergent, species‐level properties (in the strict sense species selection). Operationally, emergent species‐level properties such as geographical range can be recognized by testing whether their macroevolutionary effects are similar regardless of the different lower‐level factors that produce them. Large‐scale evolutionary trends can be driven by transformation of species, preferential production of species in a given direction, differential origination or extinction, or any combination of these; the potential for organismic traits to hitch‐hike on other factors that promote speciation or damp extinction is high. Additional key attributes of macroevolutionary dynamics within biological hierarchies are that (1) hierarchical levels are linked by upward and downward causation, so that emergent properties at a focal level do not impart complete independence; (2) hierarchical effects are asymmetrical, so that dynamics at a given focal level need not propagate upwards, but will always cascade downwards; and (3) rates are generally, although not always, faster at lower hierarchical levels. Temporal and spatial patterns in the origin of major novelties and higher taxa are significantly discordant from those at the species and genus levels, suggesting complex hierarchical effects that remain poorly understood. Not only are many of the features promoting survivorship during background times ineffective during mass extinctions, but also they are replaced in at least some cases by higher‐level, irreducible attributes such as clade‐level geographical range. The incorporation of processes that operate across hierarchical levels and a range of temporal and spatial scales has expanded and enriched our understanding of evolution.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 153 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Empirical extrapolation appears to break down, for example, in the mismatch between the demonstrated potential of most populations for rapid net change and the prevalence of net morphological stasis in many lineages over long time-scales.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > SCALE AND HIERARCHY
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“geographical ranges are heritable among species within developmental types for Late Cretaceous molluscs”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski and Hunt 2006
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“First, the relation between geographical range and molluscan species duration is significant even within developmental categories”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski and Hunt 2006
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“When the observational scale is expanded to the myr timescale, speciation rate per species per myr (Lm.y) is inversely related to median geographical range of constituent species (from Jablonski and Roy 2003).”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski and Roy 2003
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“significant inverse relation between geographical range (as measured by number of biographic provinces occupied) and extinction intensity in marine bivalves for the end-Cretaceous extinction (after Jablonski and Raup 1995).”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski and Raup 1995
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for marine bivalve genera, extinction intensities are indistinguishable among Late Cretaceous biogeographical provinces, indicating that province-scale refugia cannot explain the preferential survival of widespread genera.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two slopes do not differ significantly and are shown for comparative purposes; Spearman rank correlation 0Æ72 and 0Æ73, respectively (both P < 0Æ0001”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fossil record shows strong temporal and spatial patterns that violate expectations derived by simply scaling up simple random-mutation models to the origin of major groups or new body plans”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > ORIGIN OF NOVELTIES
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“geographical range and geological duration are positively related for gastropod species within both planktotrophic (circles, slightly shallower regression line, n ¼ 55) and non-planktotrophic (crosses, slightly steeper regression line, n ¼ 51) modes of development.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such evolutionary bursts in disparity relative to taxonomic diversification occur in early Palaeozoic invertebrates”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > ORIGIN OF NOVELTIES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Foote 1997
- Not checked yetcites Thomas et al. 2000
- Not checked yetcites Valentine 2004
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Geographical range at the genus level is unrelated to the maximum geographical range of their constituent species in A, Late Cretaceous marine bivalves and B, present-day bivalves of the eastern Pacific shelf.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but such inferences can be made more realistic whenever palaeontological data are available.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Evolution by natural selection can occur at any level where there is heritable variation that affects birth and death of units by virtue of interaction with the environment.”
- Also stated in: § HIERARCHY · plain
“Returning to Lewontin's formulation, selection can drive evolution at any level where (1) there is variation, (2) that variation influences reproduction and survival (¼ interaction at that level) and (3) the variation is heritable (¼ replication at that level).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lewontin 1970
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § HIERARCHY · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the potential for organismic traits to hitch-hike on other factors that promote speciation or damp extinction is high.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but it shows that short-term, localized observations on the evolutionary responsiveness of living populations are poor predictors of species-level behaviour over millions of years.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > SCALE AND HIERARCHY
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This situation imposes a conceptual trap by promoting the assumption that the conditions and phenomena observed today, or monitored in an area small enough for experimental manipulation or intensive replicate sampling, are sufficient to understand all of the dynamics relevant to the present-day distribution or long-term behaviour of species and clades.”
- Also stated in: § SCALE · boosted
“As discussed below, this is clearly not so in many instances.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > SCALE
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclear- Also stated in: § SCALE · boosted
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Differential survival and reproduction of units can occur at several levels within a biological hierarchy that includes DNA sequences, organisms, species and clades.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many comparative analyses of adaptation in extant species require not only a robust cladogram but also a set of inferred ancestral states for continuous characters.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“even in living systems population variability generally increases over time, regardless of taxa, body sizes, trophic level, latitude or type of population dynamics”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Inchausti and Halley 2001, 2002
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the size-frequency distributions of the tetrapod faunas on all continents, even Africa, have been significantly truncated since the Pleistocene heyday of mammoths, mastodons and ground sloths”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Barnosky et al. 2004
- Not checked yetcites Lyons et al. 2004
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Expansion of temporal and spatial scales reveals evolutionary patterns and processes that are virtually inaccessible to, and unpredictable from, short-term, localized observations.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“hierarchical levels are linked by upward and downward causation, so that emergent properties at a focal level do not impart complete independence;”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the literature is rich in examples where tree topologies change with the addition of palaeontological data”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Padian et al. 1994
- Not checked yetcites Smith 1998
- Not checked yetcites Forey and Fortey 2001
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Systematists now appreciate that an enlarged temporal window can greatly inform phylogenetic hypotheses, revealing character states and state combinations unknown in living taxa,”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Padian et al. 1994
- Not checked yetcites Smith 1998
- Not checked yetcites Forey and Fortey 2001
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More generally, spatially explicit palaeontological data show that present-day distributions can be a poor indicator of the past deployment of clades.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Spatial scale
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Spatially heterogeneous dynamics have now been recorded for many macroevolutionary events, including the Ordovician radiations, the marine Mesozoic revolution, recoveries from the end-Ordovician, end-Permian and end-Cretaceous mass extinctions, and the demise of the Pleistocene megafauna”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Spatial scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roy 1994
- Not checked yetcites Miller 1997a
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski 1998
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Returning to Lewontin's formulation, selection can drive evolution at any level where (1) there is variation, (2) that variation influences reproduction and survival (¼ interaction at that level) and (3) the variation is heritable (¼ replication at that level).”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > HIERARCHY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lewontin 1970
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The variation at lower levels was, in Brandon's terminology, screened off from selection at the organismic level.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brandon 1990
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Nor does replication need to be precise: this would exclude genes subject to mutation and crossing over, so long as it yields descendants 'similar enough to respond similarly to similar selection pressures'”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > HIERARCHY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hull 1980
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Even the latitudinal diversity gradient, the most pervasive biological pattern in the global biota, appears to be shaped significantly by interregional dispersal, contrary to the widespread assumption that in situ diversification predominates”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Spatial scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski 1993
- Not checked yetcites Wiens and Donoghue 2004
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski et al. 2006
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“analysis of species-level phenotypic change in the fossil record is not a trivial task when confronted with the realities of sampling and environmental change in real sections, and the limits imposed a kind of Palaeontological Uncertainty Principle (Jablonski 2000), the frequent tradeoff between temporal resolution and spatial coverage.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski 2000
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Expanding temporal scales to the 10 6 )10 7 year timeframe encompasses a wealth of phenomena outside the range of empirical extrapolation.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because the organism was the focal level of the experiment, we know that the large-winged phenotype was the actual, and emergent, property under selection, and not the cellular or genetic underpinnings of this trait.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“First, all possible combinations of evolutionary tempo and mode (Text-fig.2) have been documented in the fossil record:”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski 2000
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“independent movement of species having overlapping distributions is detectable only at the edges of their respective geographical ranges, which are rarely sampled palaeontologically, particularly in terrestrial systems”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roy 2001
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For example, selection on wing size in laboratory Drosophila can produce equivalent changes either by changes in cell size or by changes in cell number”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Robertson 1959 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many mechanisms for stasis have been proposed, and they are probably less mutually exclusive than generally assumed”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hansen and Houle 2004
- Not checked yetcites Eldredge et al. 2005
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Even the famed Gondwanan distributions of plants and animals across the southern continents now appear to have arisen in part by relatively recent trans-oceanic dispersal rather than fragmentation of the supercontinent”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Spatial scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites de Queiroz 2005
- Not checked yetcites Waters and Craw 2006
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The steepening of the species-area relationship (SPAR) with spatial scale probably represents a shift from situations dominated by immigration ⁄ emigration dynamics to those dominated by true origination and extinction”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Spatial scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Preston 1960
- Not checked yetcites Rosenzweig 1995 source
- Not checked yetcites Hubbell 2001
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“the buffering effects implied by SPAR slopes much lower than 1 no longer apply when perturbations approach the province-and continent-wide scales confronting palaeontologists and conservation biologists”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Spatial scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rosenzweig 2005
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seemingly clear-cut congruencies between phylogeny and large-scale biogeography, from the now-exclusively New World anteaters and hummingbirds to the now-exclusively Southern Hemisphere ratites to the nowexclusively Old World bananas and rhinoceroses, have been falsified by fossil evidence for past distributions outside present-day geographical ranges.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Spatial scale
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The replicator-interactor model encompasses more than the canonical gene-organism couplet.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > HIERARCHY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hull 1980
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“differential proliferation of a trait or a lineage at a given hierarchical level cannot simply be assumed to be driven by selection at that level”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, and more importantly, the evolutionary consequences of broad or narrow geographical ranges tend to be similar regardless of how those ranges are achieved at the organismal level, at least within broad groups such as benthic marine invertebrates.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“they provide solid evidence for causal links between the differential waxing and waning of clades and the intrinsic biotic properties of their constituent organisms, populations or species”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Freckleton et al. 2002
- Not checked yetcites Freckleton et al. 2003
- Not checked yetcites Coyne and Orr 2004
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“broad-sense species selection appears to modulate the frequency and persistence of many adaptations”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results not only support the view that geographical range is an emergent property irreducible to a single organismic trait”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The ecological literature on 'evolutionary suicide', sometimes less vividly termed Darwinian extinction, represents an independent realization that organismic selection can create conflicts across levels, in this case by driving organismic evolution in directions that increase extinction probabilities at the species and clade levels”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Webb 2003
- Not checked yetcites Parvinen 2005
- Not checked yetcites Rankin and Lo ´pez-Sepulcre 2005
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but this view also fails empirically on two counts.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“allaying concerns that the pattern results solely from the heritability of larval modes”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Webb and Gaston 2005
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As already noted, effect macroevolution, in which organismic or aggregate features determine speciation or extinction rates, can still yield outcomes at odds with processes operating exclusively at the organismic level, as when organismic selection favouring large body size conflicts with higher species-extinction probabilities or damped speciation probabilities in large-bodied taxa”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Van Valen 1975
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski 1996
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Long-term directional changes appear to pervade the history of life at virtually all scales”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McNamara 1990
- Not checked yetcites McShea 1998a
- Not checked yetcites Bambach and Knoll 2000
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“these diverse factors underlying the variation in range size among species are screened off from (i.e.do not strongly influence) the macroevolutionary outcome”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Grantham 2007
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This completes Lewontin's triad of prerequisites for evolution by selection at this higher focal level”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“many patterns could arise via passive diffusion from a fixed boundary, as when a clade originates near a minimum viable body size”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stanley 1973
- Not checked yetcites Gould 1988
- Not checked yetcites McShea 1994
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“most neontological sister-clade comparisons measure net diversification rather than raw origination and extinction rates”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“species selection in the broad sense has been validated as a significant evolutionary process many times by both palaeobiological analyses and the widespread application of comparative methods to extant clades”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski 2000
- Not checked yetcites Coyne and Orr 2004
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“(2) contribute significantly to (i.e. are significant correlatives of) species survivorship and origination rates”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski 1987
- Not checked yetcites Ricklefs and Latham 1992
- Not checked yetcites Brown 1995
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the hierarchical structure of life imposes a more complex dynamic, because evolutionary processes can operate simultaneously at each level and can propagate upwards and downwards”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Campbell 1974
- Not checked yetcites Vrba and Gould 1986
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The recognition of higher-level selection processes does not in itself complete a macroevolutionary theory”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such passive trends arise owing to the topography of the adaptive landscape”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“such arguments hold only if the shaping of organismal adaptation is the sole evolutionary process or outcome of interest, and if one ignores the operation of upward and downward causation”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but also provide a general approach to evaluating hypotheses for the relative contribution of different properties to macroevolutionary dynamics”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A further complication arises when trends are driven by protracted environmental changes, i.e. by evolution in a shifting landscape”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hunt and Roy 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these complications undermine the standard tests for recognizing passive trends”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, widespread species of marine bivalves, gastropods, echinoids and bryozoans are geologically longer-lived than spatially restricted species, regardless of whether that broad range is achieved primarily via free-swimming larvae”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“they are also (3) heritable among species in the sense that daughter species or clades resemble their ancestors more closely than expected by chance”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski 1987
- Not checked yetcites Ricklefs and Latham 1992
- Not checked yetcites Brown 1995
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“geographical ranges (1) vary in size among species”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski 1987
- Not checked yetcites Ricklefs and Latham 1992
- Not checked yetcites Brown 1995
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It appears, then, that geographical range size is determined by a complex interaction of factors whose strengths vary among clades”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brown et al. 1996
- Not checked yetcites Case et al. 2005
- Not checked yetcites Parmesan et al. 2005
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“on very broad scales morphological convergence and iteration occurs frequently”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vermeij 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Partitioning skewness in the distribution of the trending character among and within subclades can quantify the active and passive components of a trend”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wang 2001
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for marine bivalve genera, extinction intensities are indistinguishable among Late Cretaceous biogeographical provinces, indicating that province-scale refugia cannot explain the preferential survival of widespread genera.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the contingent aspects of these historical events, the history of life and the deployment of biodiversity today do not simply represent massive stochasticity layered on top of selection among millions of infinitesimally small mutations in millions of bodies in millions of species over billions of years.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“large-scale trends do appear to reflect upward-cascading effects from the organismic level”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vermeij 1987 source
- Not checked yetcites Aronson 1994
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The origin of the tetrapod limb (Clack 2005; Shubin et al. 2006), the teleost tail (Forey and Fortey 2001) and the avian wing (Norell and Xu 2005; Prum 2005) all become clearer as instances of sequential, mosaic evolution embedded within a larger radiation when data are included for the extinct stem lineages leading to the respective vertebrate classes.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Clack 2005
- Not checked yetcites Shubin et al. 2006
- Not checked yetcites Forey and Fortey 2001
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But it is clear that selection pressures favouring flight have not reliably produced birds.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“predation or competition, which by definition negatively affect species at the organismic and population level, fragment populations or otherwise impose pressures that actually promote speciation or diversification rates”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stanley 1986
- Not checked yetcites Schluter 2000 source
- Not checked yetcites Nosil and Crespi 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Trends and other macroevolutionary patterns might also be shaped by ecological interactions”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Characteristic rates of change also tend to decrease with each ascending hierarchical level (e.g.Allen and Starr 1982; Valentine and May”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Allen and Starr 1982
- Not checked yetcites Valentine and May
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“not all developmentally feasible phenotypes are equally probable”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Arthur 2002
- Not checked yetcites Gould 2002
- Not checked yetcites Hansen and Houle 2004
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They involve a set of dynamics also operating above and below the familiar level of bodies within populations, with rules manifested as statistical patterns in morphospace and the differential waxing and waning of clade richness.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dramatic evolutionary divergences or high rates of apomorphy acquisition tend to be more clearly concentrated in initial radiations than in recoveries, but this needs more thorough analysis”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > J A B L O N S K I : S C A L E A N D H I E R A R C H Y 9 9
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Anstey and Pachut 1995
- Not checked yetcites Wagner 1995
- Not checked yetcites Foote 1999
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Hierarchical approaches to evolutionary trends were first seen in the context of punctuated equilibrium”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stanley 1979
- Not checked yetcites Gould 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As already noted, clade interactions must also be an important component of macroevolution, if only from the standpoint of priority or incumbency effects that presumably dampen diversification dynamics under many circumstances.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > J A B L O N S K I : S C A L E A N D H I E R A R C H Y 9 9
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“stasis is not necessary for largescale trends to be shaped by more than just selection and other processes at the organismic level”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bookstein et al. 1978
- Not checked yetcites Slatkin 1981
- Not checked yetcites Sober 1984
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 41
- Probably not a substantial claim. 27
In the paper
“Palaeontological data, however, can test per-taxon speciation rates against maximum geographical ranges of species within lineages, circumventing this problem and showing a highly significant inverse relation between geographical range and speciation rate, at least in marine gastropods”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski and Roy 2003
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All possible combinations of evolutionary tempo and mode have been recorded from the fossil record.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The fossil record is adequate to document the full range of combinations of evolutionary tempo and mode.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the number of species varies by several orders of magnitude among those groups, and not all of them are still with us.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the net macroevolutionary trend towards size increase in the Eocene mammal Hyopsodus emerges from an underlying dynamic containing three gradual size increases, one punctuational size increase, one period of size stasis and three gradual size decreases, i.e. gradualistic change was random with respect to the macroevolutionary outcome”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bookstein et al. 1978
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Larval mode does improve the fit relative to the simplest model, but the model using geographical range as the predictor performs much better, and there is only a slight, non-significant increase in log-likelihood when adding larval mode as a second predictor”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It gives abundant evidence for the spatial volatility of species distributions, with the individualistic behaviour of most species through the Pleistocene and Holocene generating transient associations that lack precise equivalents on the modern landscape”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bennett 1997
- Not checked yetcites Jackson and Overpeck 2000
- Not checked yetcites Davis and Shaw 2001
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By contrast, some authors have argued (convincingly, in my view) that the logic of natural selection and other evolutionary forces need not reside exclusively at the organismic level: differential success of heritable variation owing to interaction with the environment, the Darwinian dynamic, also occurs at higher and lower levels.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > SCALE AND HIERARCHY
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analyses restricted to a single time plane can be powerful, but can also be misleading or yield multiple alternatives because almost always they must deal with net diversification rates rather than the fundamental dynamic variables of raw speciation and extinction rates.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Virtually all of these phenomena probably involve both ecological and developmental factors, but the integration of these components with macroevolutionary theory has only just begun.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Scale and hierarchy must be incorporated into any conceptual framework for the study of macroevolution, i.e. evolution above the species level.”
- Also stated in: § SCALE AND HIERARCHY · plain
“Scale and hierarchy are essential components of the conceptual framework for macroevolutionary analysis.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Also stated in: § SCALE AND HIERARCHY · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“hierarchical effects are asymmetrical, so that dynamics at a given focal level need not propagate upwards, but will always cascade downwards;”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not only are many of the features promoting survivorship during background times ineffective during mass extinctions, but also they are replaced in at least some cases by higher-level, irreducible attributes such as clade-level geographical range.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“rates are generally, although not always, faster at lower hierarchical levels.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“whereas present-day populations show great responsiveness to directional selection over the short run, palaeontological observations on many species show a tendency to net stasis and fairly stable boundaries to phenotypic change through time”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jackson and Cheetham 1999
- Not checked yetcites Gould 2002
- Not checked yetcites Eldredge et al. 2005
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Indeed, palaeontological data can both provide the necessary empirical foundation for some clades, and test the power and accuracy of inferential methods with independent estimates of ancestral traits”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Polly 2001
- Not checked yetcites Webster and Purvis 2002a, b
- Not checked yetcites Finarelli and Flynn 2006
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Operationally, emergent species-level properties such as geographical range can be recognized by testing whether their macroevolutionary effects are similar regardless of the different lower-level factors that produce them.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Inferences on these character states are highly model-dependent and are generally saddled with wide confidence intervals”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cunningham et al. 1998
- Not checked yetcites Martins 2000
- Not checked yetcites Pagel et al. 2004
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the 'living fossil' members of the ancient molluscan class Monoplacophora, which are limpet-like forms that are apparently the outgroup to the rest of the living conchiferans (bivalves, gastropods, scaphopods, cephalopods), were often used to infer character states at the start of the great molluscan radiations but are now understood to be highly derived”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Large-scale evolutionary trends can be driven by transformation of species, preferential production of species in a given direction, differential origination or extinction, or any combination of these;”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Molecular phylogenetic methods provide an independent (though hardly infallible) basis for inferring evolutionary tree topologies but are largely uninformative about the phenotypes residing at key nodes”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Erwin et al. 1997
- Not checked yetcites Erwin and Davidson 2002
- Not checked yetcites Valentine 2006
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Temporal and spatial patterns in the origin of major novelties and higher taxa are significantly discordant from those at the species and genus levels, suggesting complex hierarchical effects that remain poorly understood.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Comparative developmental analysis can shed light on evolutionary transformations, but the rampant co-option of regulatory genes can make inferences about nodal forms extremely difficult,”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Valentine et al. 1999
- Not checked yetcites Erwin and Davidson 2002
- Not checked yetcites Valentine 2004
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, there is differential speciation or extinction (i.e.differential survival and reproduction of species within clades) by virtue of the interaction of the emergent properties of species (such as geographical range or genetic population structure) with the biotic and physical environment.This is species selection in the strict sense.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > HIERARCHY
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“This approach, which is similar to Brandon's (1990) application of the statistical concept of 'screening-off', has often been tacitly applied at the organismic level.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brandon 1990
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The apparent temporal coherence in these assemblages could just as readily be a passive consequence of sampling artefacts, overlapping tolerances and rates of displacement,”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One relatively straightforward operational approach to identifying emergent properties is to treat a feature as emergent at a given level if its evolutionary consequences do not depend on how the feature is generated at lower levels”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski 2000
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski and Hunt 2006
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“For example, mean body size or pelt coloration may validly characterize species but are essentially statistical statements about organisms within the species; these have been termed aggregate properties to distinguish them from emergent ones”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vrba and Eldredge 1984
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The cohesion or discreteness of the interactor need not be absolute; indeed, such a requirement would exclude even organisms, the paradigmatic interactors: interactors thus reside at many levels in the biological hierarchy”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > HIERARCHY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hull 1980
- Not checked yetcites Hull 2001
- Not checked yetcites Eldredge 1985
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the biota is proving in many cases to be more dynamic than the earth beneath it.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Spatial scale
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Evolution thus involves both replication (reproduction of 'individuals' with heritability) and interaction (fitness differentials among 'individuals'), and many authors have argued that the interplay of those two processes can shape lineages at any hierarchical level”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > HIERARCHY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wright 1959
- Not checked yetcites Lewontin 1970
- Not checked yetcites Hull 1980
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Second, there is differential extinction or speciation (i.e.differential survival and reproduction of species within clades) by virtue of the interaction of the phenotypes of bodies with the biotic and physical environment.This is effect macroevolution as defined by Vrba (1980;Vrba and Gould 1986).”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > HIERARCHY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vrba 1980
- Not checked yetcites Vrba and Gould 1986
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most famous of these is the extraordinary frequency of net evolutionary stasis through the history of morphospecies despite the short-term malleability of most populations.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Temporal scale
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Lewontin's (1970) classic prescription for evolution by natural selection requires heritable variation in traits that influence fitness of units at a given level.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > HIERARCHY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lewontin 1970
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For the purposes of this discussion, consider three evolutionary processes that can occur simultaneously.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > HIERARCHY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vrba 1980
- Not checked yetcites Vrba and Gould 1986
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The second and third processes are often grouped into broad-sense species selection, with the key criteria being emergent fitness at the species level, i.e. differential birth and death (replication) rather than emergent properties (interaction) at the species level”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > HIERARCHY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stanley 1979
- Not checked yetcites Gould 2002
- Not checked yetcites Grantham 1995
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Thus, the mechanism of replication is less important than the descriptive, essentially statistical issue of heritability (Mayr 1982;Wagner 1988Wagner , 1990)), which can also be addressed at any hierarchical level.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > HIERARCHY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayr 1982
- Not checked yetcites Wagner 1988
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“such dispersal events, and presumably regional extinctions, are probabilistic and not truly random”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Spatial scale
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cook and Crisp 2005
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“dynamics at the species level can determine the persistence and number of genealogical units bearing wings within and among clades, and even the long-term persistence of such a trait”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the biased replication of selfish genetic elements with each cell cycle is rapid relative to the generation times of most metazoan organisms, which in turn are brief relative to the speciation rates of most metazoan clades”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gregory and Mable 2005
- Not checked yetcites Masterson 1994
- Not checked yetcites Tate et al. 2005
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the number of replicating units decreases going up the hierarchy so that chance effects may become more important”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stanley 1979
- Not checked yetcites Levinton et al. 1986
- Not checked yetcites Levinton 2001
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“such long-term changes can arise via a wide range of mechanisms, and that different dynamics can operate simultaneously, in opposition or in concert, at different levels”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In contrast to body size, geographical range is widely regarded as an emergent property at the species level, inversely related to both extinction and speciation rates”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski 1987
- Not checked yetcites Brown 1995
- Not checked yetcites Grantham 1995
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the propagation of effects is asymmetrical: dynamics at lower levels need not impinge on higher levels but dynamics at higher levels must always propagate downwards”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Emergence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Salthe 1985 source
- Not checked yetcites Valentine and May 1996
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a trend may be underlain by transformation of its constituent species, by preferential origination of new species, by random speciation followed by differential survival or proliferation in the direction of the trend, or by any combination of these very different processes”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In extreme cases, taxa can weather a mass extinction only to disappear a few million years later, or fall into marginal roles.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > J A B L O N S K I : S C A L E A N D H I E R A R C H Y 9 9
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More puzzling are the clades that survive mass extinctions but fail to participate in the evolutionary recovery.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > J A B L O N S K I : S C A L E A N D H I E R A R C H Y 9 9
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“most clades probably experience more complex pressures, and those may change over geological time-scales”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“as in Patzkowsk's (1995) finding that bivalves and mammals produce more new genera relative to estimated speciation rates during postextinction recoveries than expected from 'normal' times.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > J A B L O N S K I : S C A L E A N D H I E R A R C H Y 9 9
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Patzkowsk's (1995)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“every new clade of high rank must begin with a new species, but when and where those clade-founding species occur evidently depends strongly on ecological context”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > ORIGIN OF NOVELTIES
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such approaches have been little explored and will face difficulties pinpointing the focal level of selection, but are likely to produce novel insights”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“When within-species anagenetic changes are significant, they can be reinforced by higher-level processes, or they may be unrelated to, or even counter to, the overall trend”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > Trends
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Historical context and the biological raw material available to a clade must be important to many aspects of macroevolution, and I have barely touched upon those aspects here.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“macroevolutionary principles reviewed here in no way invalidate the operation of the traditional neodarwinian mechanisms, but they expand evolutionary theory to a richer and more realistic picture of processes across a range of temporal and spatial scales and across hierarchical levels.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recoveries need not involve an across-the-board expansion of a surviving clade in morphospace, but can instead involve only subregions of the occupied morphospace or be channelled in just one or a few directions”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > J A B L O N S K I : S C A L E A N D H I E R A R C H Y 9 9
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dommergues et al. 1996
- Not checked yetcites Lockwood 2004
- Not checked yetcites McGowan 2004a
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It is worth keeping in mind that if mass-extinction survivorship is simply indifferent, rather than truly antithetical, to many of the factors that promote success during the normal times that constitute the vast bulk of geological time, then some 'preadaptation' to mass extinction drivers should occur by chance (see discussion by Jablonski 2005a).”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > J A B L O N S K I : S C A L E A N D H I E R A R C H Y 9 9
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jablonski 2005a
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Just as survivors of mass extinctions can be difficult to predict from pre-extinction successes, long-term post-extinction successes are difficult to predict from the survivors of mass extinctions.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > J A B L O N S K I : S C A L E A N D H I E R A R C H Y 9 9
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Presumably, as with any large-scale biotic upheaval, the post-extinction trajectories of clades depend upon the interaction of intrinsic diversification rates (as set by organismic and higher-level traits), biotic interactions and physical environmental factors, along with stochastic effects.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > J A B L O N S K I : S C A L E A N D H I E R A R C H Y 9 9
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recovery dynamics are poorly understood, in part because they have received so little attention from a comparative standpoint.”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > J A B L O N S K I : S C A L E A N D H I E R A R C H Y 9 9
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Much of the comparative biology literature is an attempt to grapple with this possibility, phrased in terms of phylogenetic effects, but it has rarely been tested palaeontologically (but seeWagner 1996).”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wagner 1996
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The origins of major novelties and higher taxa need to be evaluated in terms of both scale and hierarchy”
§ SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION > ORIGIN OF NOVELTIES
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper relies on this without support.
The fossil record is adequate to document the full range of combinations of evolutionary tempo and mode.
“All possible combinations of evolutionary tempo and mode have been recorded from the fossil record.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Thus, the expectation of morphological novelty differs depending on the specific drivers of an individual adaptive radiation [74–80].”
From Novelty and Innovation in the History of Life (2015) · cites this paper as [80]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
A cited publication year differs from its reference entry
MinorThe text cites Arnold and Fristrup as a 1992 publication, but the corresponding reference entry gives 1982.
“Damuth and Heisler 1988;Arnold and Fristrup 1992;Okasha 2004;Rice 2004”
“A R N O L D , A. J. and F R I S T R U P , K. 1982. The theory of evo- lution by natural selection: a hierarchical expansion.”
Chapter pages exceed the stated length of its book
MinorThe reference places a chapter on pages 348-385 of a book stated to have only 344 pages.
“Macroevolutionary trends: perception depends on the measure used. 348-385.”
“Evolutionary patterns: growth, form, and tempo in the fossil record. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 344 pp.”
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
Press, H. (1886) · Cited by 10,087
Developmental Plasticity and Evolution
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195122343.001.0001 · Cited by 6,115
The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography
Jetschke, G., & Hubbell, S. P. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/3071998 · Cited by 5,699
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Species diversity in space and time
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2720 · Cited by 4,581
Species Diversity in Space and Time
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623387 · Cited by 3,690
The Structure of Evolutionary Theory
Gould, S. J. (2002) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674417922 · Cited by 3,176
The structure of evolutionary theory
Gould, S. J. (2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-6411 · Cited by 2,764
Phylogenetic Analysis and Comparative Data: A Test and Review of Evidence
Freckleton, R. P., Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. (2002) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/343873 · Cited by 2,604
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 309 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- ARONSON R. B., 1994, Scale‐independent biological interactions in the marine environment, Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 32, 435
- BAMBACH R. K., 2000, Paleobiology, 1
- BROWN J. H., 1995, Macroecology, 269
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2002)028 · DOI
- COYNE J. A., 2004, Speciation, 545
- DAWKINS R., 1989, Artificial life, 201
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026 · DOI
- ELDREDGE N., 1989, Macroevolutionary dynamics, 226
- ERWIN D. H., 2005, Evolving form and function: fossils and development, 67
- FRECKLETON R. P., 2003, Macroecology, concepts and consequences, 391
- GOULD S. J., 1982, Perspectives on evolution, 83
- HALLGRIMSSON B., 2005, Variation, 567
- HARNIK P. G., 2006, International Congress on Bivalvia, Scientific Program and Abstracts, 42
- HUNT G., 2002, Macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic variation: a test using the deep‐sea ostracode genus Poseidonamicus, Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 34, 33
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030 · DOI
- JABLONSKI D., 1986, Larval ecology and macroevolution of marine invertebrates, Bulletin of Marine Science, 39, 565
- JACKSON S. T., 2004, Frontiers of biogeography, 47
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030 · DOI
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030 · DOI
- McNAMARA K. J., 1990, Evolutionary trends, 368
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026 · DOI
- ROOPNARINE P. D., 2005, The likelihood of stratophenetic‐based hypotheses of genealogical succession, Special Papers in Palaeontology, 73, 143
- ROSENZWEIG M. L., 2004, Frontiers of biogeography, 324
- SEPKOSKI J. J., 1996, Evolutionary paleobiology, 211
- STANLEY S. M., 1979, Macroevolution, 332
- SUTER S. J., 1988, Echinoderm biology, 818
- VERMEIJ G. J., 1996, Adaptation, 363
- VRBA E. S., 1980, Evolution, species, and fossils: how does life evolve?, South African Journal of Science, 76, 61
- VRBA E. S., 1989, Levels of selection and sorting with special reference to the species level, Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 6, 111
- WAGNER G. P., 1990, The domestication of replicators: a neo‐Darwinian commentary on the concept of replicator selection, Evolutionary Trends in Plants, 4, 71
- WAKE M. H., 2004, Integrative biology: the nexus of development, ecology, and evolution, Biology International, 46, 1
- WEBSTER M., 2005, Do trilobites show declining intraspecific variability?, Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 37, 486
- WHITTAKER R. J., 2003, Macroecology, concepts and consequences, 107
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Upham, N. S., Esselstyn, J. A., & Jetz, W. (2019) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494 · Cited by 1,235
Evolution, the Extended Synthesis
Pigliucci, M., & Müller, G. (2010) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262513678.001.0001 · Cited by 976
The evolution of hierarchical gene regulatory networks
Erwin, D. H., & Davidson, E. H. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2499 · Cited by 454
Species Selection: Theory and Data
Jablonski, D. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173510 · Cited by 375
Self-citationBIOTIC INTERACTIONS AND MACROEVOLUTION: EXTENSIONS AND MISMATCHES ACROSS SCALES AND LEVELS
Jablonski, D. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00317.x · Cited by 296
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- JABLONSKI, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- JABLONSKI, DAVID
- ORCID
- JABLONSKI, DAVID
- Venue
- Palaeontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-109
- ISSN
- 0031-0239 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-4983
- OpenAlex
- W2110891168
- Semantic Scholar
- 3a31025e070434d76593fd165b24006ab766a5e1
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 309
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Palaeontology (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Keywords
- macroevolution, biological hierarchy, species selection, emergent properties, speciation and extinction, evolutionary innovation, Cambrian explosion, post-extinction recovery, metazoan origin, geographic range, evolutionary rates, natural selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review