The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Satisfaction with Surgery Outcomes and the Decision Process in a Population‐Based Sample of Women with Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Objective. To better understand medical decision making in the context of “preference sensitive care,” we investigated factors associated with breast cancer patients' satisfaction with the type of surgery received and with the decision process. Data Sources/Data Collection. For a population‐based sample of recently diagnosed breast cancer patients in the Detroit and Los Angeles metropolitan areas (N=1,633), demographic and clinical data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results tumor registry, and self‐reported psychosocial and satisfaction data were obtained through a mailed survey (78.4 percent response rate). Study Design. Cross‐sectional design in which multivariable logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with three satisfaction measures: low satisfaction with surgery type, low satisfaction with the decision process, and decision regret. Principal Findings. Overall, there were high levels of satisfaction with both surgery and the decision process, and low rates of decision regret. Ethnic minority women and those with low incomes were more likely to have low satisfaction or decision regret. In addition, the match between patient preferences regarding decision involvement and their actual level of involvement was a strong indicator of satisfaction and decision regret/ambivalence. While having less involvement than preferred was a significant indicator of low satisfaction and regret, having more involvement than preferred was also a risk factor. Women who received mastectomy without reconstruction were more likely to report low satisfaction with surgery (odds ratio [OR]=1.54, p<.05), low satisfaction with the process (OR=1.37, p<.05), and decision regret (OR=1.55, p<.05) compared with those receiving breast conserving surgery (BCS). An additional finding was that as patients' level of involvement in the decision process increased, the rate of mastectomy also increased (p<.001). Conclusions. A significant proportion of breast cancer patients experience a decision process that matches their preferences for participation, and report satisfaction with both the process and the outcome. However, women who report more involvement in the decision process are significantly less likely to receive a lumpectomy. Thus, increasing patient involvement in the decision process will not necessarily increase use of BCS or lead to greater satisfaction. The most salient aspect for satisfaction with the decision making process is the match between patients' preferences and experiences regarding participation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005
Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
Babbie, E., & Dillman, D. A. (1982) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2068433 · Cited by 6,852
Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
Osmond, M. W., & Dillman, D. A. (1979) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2577403 · Cited by 5,023
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3 · Cited by 4,137 · cited 1×
“Efforts to improve tailored interactions with patients present a number of challenges, including that this is a labor-intensive endeavor ( Charles, Gafni, and Whelan 1997 ).”
BackgroundAssessing the Effects of Physician-Patient Interactions on the Outcomes of Chronic Disease
Kaplan, S. H., Greenfield, S., & Ware, J. E. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00010 · Cited by 2,043
Information Needs and Decisional Preferences in Women With Breast Cancer
Degner, L. F. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540420081039 · Cited by 1,136
Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?
Degner, L. F., & Sloan, J. A. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9 · Cited by 1,008
Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres
Wennberg, J. E. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7370.961 · Cited by 812
Patient participation in decision-making
Guadagnoli, E., & Ward, P. (1998) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00059-8 · Cited by 796
Fallowfield, L. J., Hall, A., Maguire, G. P., & Baum, M. (1990) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.301.6752.575 · Cited by 750
Cited by
Where Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Shared Decision Making and Patient Outcomes
Shay, L. A., & Lafata, J. E. (2015) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x14551638 · Cited by 1,214
Helping Patients Decide: Ten Steps to Better Risk Communication
Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Ubel, P. A. (2011) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djr318 · Cited by 573
Self-citationBreast Reconstruction after Surgery for Breast Cancer
Cordeiro, P. G. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmct0802899 · Cited by 395
Katipamula, R., Degnim, A. C., Hoskin, T., Boughey, J. C., Loprinzi, C., Grant, C. S., Brandt, K. R., Pruthi, S., Chute, C. G., Olson, J. E., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.19.4225 · Cited by 373
Hu, E. S., Pusic, A. L., Waljee, J. F., Kuhn, L., Hawley, S. T., Wilkins, E., & Alderman, A. K. (2009) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181ab10b2 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Lantz, P. M., Janz, N. K., Fagerlin, A., Schwartz, K., Liu, L., Lakhani, I., Salem, B., & Katz, S. J.
- Venue
- Health Services Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-24
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 745-768
- ISSN
- 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6773
- OpenAlex
- W1871291000
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 34.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Satisfaction with Surgery Outcomes and the Decision Process in a Population‐Based Sample of Women with Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00383.x
- The paper
- Lantz, P. M., Janz, N. K., Fagerlin, A., Schwartz, K., Liu, L., Lakhani, I., Salem, B., & Katz, S. J. (2005). Satisfaction with Surgery Outcomes and the Decision Process in a Population‐Based Sample of Women with Breast Cancer. Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00383.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.