Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,935

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and Testing of a Short Form of the Patient Activation Measure

Open access
Hibbard, Judith H., Mahoney, Eldon R., Stockard, Jean, Tusler, Martin·2005·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objective. The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) is a 22‐item measure that assesses patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self‐management. The measure was developed using Rasch analyses and is an interval level, unidimensional, Guttman‐like measure. The current analysis is aimed at reducing the number of items in the measure while maintaining adequate precision. Study Methods. We relied on an iterative use of Rasch analysis to identify items that could be eliminated without loss of significant precision and reliability. With each item deletion, the item scale locations were recalibrated and the person reliability evaluated to check if and how much of a decline in precision of measurement resulted from the deletion of the item. Data Sources. The data used in the analysis were the same data used in the development of the original 22‐item measure. These data were collected in 2003 via a telephone survey of 1,515 randomly selected adults. Principal Findings. The analysis yielded a 13‐item measure that has psychometric properties similar to the original 22‐item version. The scores for the 13‐item measure range in value from 38.6 to 53.0 (on a theoretical 0–100 point scale). The range of values is essentially unchanged from the original 22‐item version. Subgroup analysis suggests that there is a slight loss of precision with some subgroups. Conclusions. The results of the analysis indicate that the shortened 13‐item version is both reliable and valid.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bandura A., 1991, Adaption, Learning and Affect, 226
  2. 10.1071/PY03022 · DOI
  3. Institute of Medicine, 2004, 1st Annual Crossing the Quality Chasm Summit: A Focus on Communities, 26
  4. Prochaska J. O., 1997, Health Behavior and Health Education
  5. Smith R. M., 1996, Polytomous Mean‐Square Fit Statistics, Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10, 516

Cited by

See all 1,935

Metadata

Authors
Hibbard, J. H., Mahoney, E. R., Stockard, J., & Tusler, M.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-26
Volume
40
Issue
6p1
Pages
1918-1930
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2155355450
Cited by
1,935
References
2
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Testing of a Short Form of the Patient Activation Measure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x
The paper
Hibbard, J. H., Mahoney, E. R., Stockard, J., & Tusler, M. (2005). Development and Testing of a Short Form of the Patient Activation Measure. Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.