Cited by 159Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesInfant Development and Preterm CareInfant Nutrition and Health

Improved estimates of the benefits of breastfeeding using sibling comparisons to reduce selection bias

Open access
Evenhouse, Eirik, Reilly, Siobhan·2005·Health Services Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Better measurement of the health and cognitive benefits of breastfeeding by using sibling comparisons to reduce sample selection bias. DATA: We use data on the breastfeeding history, physical and emotional health, academic performance, cognitive ability, and demographic characteristics of 16,903 adolescents from the first (1994) wave of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. The sample includes 2,734 sibling pairs. STUDY DESIGN: We examine the relationship between breastfeeding history and 15 indicators of physical health, emotional health, and cognitive ability, using ordinary least squares and logit regression. For each indicator, we estimate, in addition to the usual between-family model, a within-family model to see whether differences in siblings' outcomes are associated with differences in the siblings' breastfeeding histories. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Nearly all of the correlations found in the between-family model become statistically insignificant in the within-family model. The notable exception is a persistent positive correlation between breastfeeding and cognitive ability. These findings hold whether breastfeeding is measured in terms of duration or as a Yes/No variable. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides persuasive evidence of a causal connection between breastfeeding and intelligence. However, it also suggests that nonexperimental studies of breastfeeding overstate some of its other long-term benefits, even if controls are included for race, ethnicity, income, and education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00453.x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The within-sibship analyses in both studies were imprecisely estimated and not reliably different from the results of analyses between unrelated individuals.

    “though the within-sibship analyses in both studies were imprecisely estimated and not reliably different from the results of analyses between unrelated individuals.62–64”

    From Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology (2017) · cites this paper as [62]

  • The largest of the two within-sibship comparisons suggested that any associations observed between unrelated individuals were explained by shared familial confounding.

    “The largest62,63 of the two within-sibship comparisons suggested that any associations observed between unrelated individuals were explained by shared familial confounding”

    From Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology (2017) · cites this paper as [62]

  • Three studies were identified which examined associations of being breastfed with BMI.

    “Three studies were identified which examined associations of being breastfed with BMI.”

    From Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology (2017) · cites this paper as [62]

  • The study that focused on mean BMI included 2734 sib-pairs aged 12-18.

    “we present results from the study that focused on mean BMI (2734 sib-pairs; ages 12–18).62”

    From Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology (2017) · cites this paper as [62]

  • Two of the identified studies used the same data from the US National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) and had similar results.

    “Two of these used the same data from the US National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) and had similar results;62,63”

    From Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology (2017) · cites this paper as [62]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Anderson, J. W., B. M. Johnstone, and D. T. Remley. 1999. ''Breastfeeding and Cog- nitive Development: A Meta-Analysis.'' The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 70: 525-35.
  2. Davis, M. K. 1998. ''Review of the Evidence for an Association between Infant Feeding and Childhood Cancer.'' International Journal of Cancer 11 (suppl): 29-33.
  3. Nelson, M., P. Gordon-Larsen, and L. Adair. 2003. ''The Protective Effect of Breast- feeding on Adolescent Overweight Disappears with Use of Sibling Controls.'' Presentation at the 2003 Add Health Users Workshop, Bethesda, MD.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evenhouse, E., & Reilly, S.
Affiliations
Mills College (US)
Corresponding author
Evenhouse, Eirik
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-15
Volume
40
Issue
6p1
Pages
1781-1802
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2141542301
Cited by
159
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (T32HS000086, 5 T32 HS00086)
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01- HD31921, P01HD031921)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
breastfeeding, sibling comparison, selection bias, cognitive ability, intelligence, adolescent health, emotional well-being, physical health, academic performance, breastfeeding duration, Add Health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Body Weights and Measures, Breast Feeding, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Longitudinal Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Selection Bias, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review