Cited by 48Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesCognitive Abilities and TestingInfant Development and Preterm Care

Breastfeeding, Maternal Education and Cognitive Function: A Prospective Study in Twins

Open access
Bartels, M., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Boomsma, D. I.·2009·Behavior Genetics

Abstract

The effect of breastfeeding on cognitive abilities is examined in the offspring of highly educated women and compared to the effects in women with low or middle educational attainment. All offspring consisted of 12-year old mono- or dizygotic twins and this made it possible to study the effect of breastfeeding on mean cognition scores as well as the moderating effects of breastfeeding on the heritability of variation in cognition. Information on breastfeeding and cognitive ability was available for 6,569 children. Breastfeeding status was prospectively assessed in the first years after birth of the children. Maternal education is positively associated with performance on a standardized test for cognitive ability in offspring. A significant effect of breastfeeding on cognition was also observed. The effect was similar for offspring with mothers with a high, middle, and low educational level. Breast-fed children of highly educated mothers score on average 7.6 point higher on a standardized test of cognitive abilities (CITO test; range 500–550; effects size = .936) than formula-fed children of mothers with a low education. Individual differences in cognition scores are largely accounted for by additive genetic factors (80%) and breastfeeding does not modify the effect of genetic factors in any of the three strata of maternal education. Heritability was slightly lower in children with a mother with a middle-level education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10519-009-9293-9

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have failed to replicate the G × SES finding, including the largest sample to date.

    “Other studies, however, have failed to replicate the finding (Bartels, van Beijsterveldt, & Boomsma, 2009; Kremen et al., 2005; Soden-Hensler, 2012; van der Sluis, Willemsen, de Geus, Boomsma, & Posthuma, 2008), including the largest sample to date (Hanscombe et al., 2012).”

    From Large Cross-National Differences in Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Intelligence (2016) · cites this paper as Bartels, van Beijsterveldt, & Boomsma, 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Raven J Raven JC Court JH Raven manual: section 4 advanced progressive matrices 1998 Oxford Oxford Psychologists Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartels, M., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., & Boomsma, D. I.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Bartels, M.
Venue
Behavior Genetics
Published
2009-08-04
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
616-622
ISSN
  • 0001-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3297
OpenAlex
W2116383443
Cited by
48
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Behavior Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO/ SPI 56-464-14192, 400‐05‐717, NWO 480-04-004, 56‐464‐14192, Spi-56-464-14192, 14192, 480-04-004)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (RO1 MH58799-03, R01MH58799‐03, R01MH058799)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
breastfeeding, maternal education, cognitive ability, heritability of intelligence, monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, bottle feeding, genetic factors, moderating effect, educational attainment
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Breast Feeding, Child, Educational Status, Female, Genotype, Humans, Individuality, Infant, Intelligence, Male, Models, Genetic, Netherlands, Phenotype, Prospective Studies, Social Environment, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review