Cited by 48Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Role and involvement of life end information forum physicians in euthanasia and other end-of-life care decisions in Flanders, Belgium

Open access
Van Wesemael, Yanna, Cohen, Joachim, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen, Bregje D., Bilsen, Johan, Distelmans, Wim, Deliens, Luc·2009·Health Services Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe role and involvement of Life End Information Forum (LEIF) physicians in end-of-life care decisions and euthanasia in Flanders. STUDY DESIGN: All 132 LEIF physicians in Belgium received a questionnaire inquiring about their activities in the past year, and their end-of-life care training and experience. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Response rate was 75 percent. Most respondents followed substantive training in end-of-life care. In 1 year, LEIF physicians were contacted 612 times for consultations in end-of-life decisions, of which 355 concerned euthanasia requests eventually resulting in 221 euthanasia cases. LEIF physicians also gave information about various end-of-life issues (including palliative care) to patients and colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: LEIF physicians provide a forum for information and advice for physicians and patients. A similar health service providing support to physicians for all end-of-life decisions could also be beneficial for countries without a euthanasia law.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01042.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Guideline II strongly advises not only the involvement of an interdisciplinary team but also the provision of extensive additional support, including a central End-of-Life Support Group, a local End-of-Life Support Group, and optionally trained LEIF physicians.

    “Guideline II strongly advises not only the involvement of an interdisciplinary team but also the provision of extensive additional support.Going beyond the legal requirements, this additional support is recommended to involve: 1) a central, interdisciplinary End-of-Life Support Group (covering all the psychiatric centers of this network and open to external experts), established in order to gain”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Board of the Royal Dutch Medical Association. 1996. ''Vision on Euthanasia'' Euthanasia in the Netherlands. 5th Edition. Utrecht: Board of the Royal Dutch Medical As- sociation.
  2. Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (Review Procedures) Act April 1, 2002. ''Wet Toetsing Levensbeeindiging Op Verzoek En Hulp Bij Zelfdoding 1 April, 2002.''
  3. Van den Block, L. 2008. End-of-Life Care and Medical Decision-Making in the Last Phase of Life. Brussels, Belgium: VUB Press.
  4. Weyers, H. 2001. ''Euthanasia: The Process of Legal Change in the Netherlands. The Making of the 'Requirement of Careful Practice'.'' In Regulating Physician-Nego- tiated Death, edited by A. Klijn, M. Otlowski, and M. Trappenburg, pp. 11-27. Gravenhage, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Wesemael, Y., Cohen, J., Onwuteaka‐Philipsen, B. D., Bilsen, J., Distelmans, W., & Deliens, L.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE)
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-13
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
2180-2192
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2048748160
Cited by
48
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Universiteit Gent
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
euthanasia, end-of-life care decisions, palliative care, end-of-life care training, physician consultation, euthanasia legislation, Flanders
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Death, Belgium, Decision Making, Euthanasia, Group Processes, Humans, Middle Aged, Physician's Role, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Terminally Ill

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review