Cited by 109Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The Euthanasia law in Belgium and the Netherlands

Deliens, Luc, van der Wal, Gerrit·2003·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14520-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deliens, L., & van der Wal, G.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
362
Issue
9391
Pages
1239-1240
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2166906622
Cited by
109
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
euthanasia legislation, assisted suicide, physician-assisted suicide, Belgium, Netherlands, end-of-life decisions, patient autonomy, informed consent, review procedures, physician-patient relationship, mental competence, legalization of euthanasia, comparative law, palliative care, euthanasia in the United States
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Belgium, Euthanasia, Humans, Informed Consent, Netherlands, Mental Competency, Suicide, Assisted, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review