Cited by 53Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The medical practice of euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands: Legal notification, control and evaluation procedures

Smets, Tinne, Bilsen, Johan, Cohen, Joachim, Rurup, Mette L., De Keyser, Els, Deliens, Luc·2009·Health Policy

Abstract

Objectives To describe and compare current legal procedures for notifying, controlling and evaluating (NCE-procedures) euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands, and to discuss the implications for a safe and controllable euthanasia practice.Methods We systematically studied and compared official documents relating to the Belgian and the Dutch NCE-procedures for euthanasia.Results In both countries, physicians are required to notify their cases to a review Committee, stimulating them to safeguard the quality of their euthanasia practice and to make societal control over the practice of euthanasia possible. However, the procedures in both countries differ. The main differences are that the Dutch notification and control procedures are more elaborate and transparent than the Belgian, and that the Belgian procedures are primarily anonymous, whereas the Dutch are not. Societal evaluation is made in both countries through the Committees' summary reports to Parliament.Conclusions Transparent procedures like the Dutch may better facilitate societal control. Informing physicians about the law and the due care requirements for euthanasia, and systematic feedback about their medical actions are both pivotal to achieving efficient societal control and engendering the level of care needed when performing such far-reaching medical acts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.10.003

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of cases of euthanasia for psychological suffering in psychiatric patients in Belgium has steadily risen since legalisation.

    “In line with a general increase of euthanasia cases, the number of cases of euthanasia for psychological suffering is steadily rising (Chambaere, Vander Stichele, Mortier, Cohen, & Deliens, 2015;Smets et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smets, T., Bilsen, J., Cohen, J., Rurup, M. L., De Keyser, E., & Deliens, L.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Corresponding author
Smets, Tinne
Venue
Health Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
90
Issue
2-3
Pages
181-187
ISSN
0168-8510 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139788293
Cited by
53
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
euthanasia, review committee, physician reporting obligations, transparency, anonymous reporting, Belgium, Netherlands, comparative law
MeSH terms
Belgium, Euthanasia, Humans, Netherlands, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Social Control Policies, Program Evaluation, Suicide, Assisted, Government Regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review