Cited by 77Survey Methodology and NonresponseSurvey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesEconomic and Environmental Valuation

Lottery-Based versus Fixed Incentives to Increase Clinicians' Response to Surveys

Open access
Halpern, Scott D., Kohn, Rachel, Dornbrand-Lo, Aaron, Metkus, Thomas, Asch, David A., Volpp, Kevin G.·2011·Health Services Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of lottery-based and fixed incentives on clinicians' response to surveys. DATA SOURCES: Three randomized trials with fixed payments and actuarially equivalent lotteries. STUDY DESIGN: Trial 1 compared a low-probability/high-payout lottery, a high-probability/low-payout lottery, and no incentive. Trial 2 compared a moderate-probability/moderate-payout lottery with an unconditional fixed payment (payment sent with questionnaire). Trial 3 compared a moderate-probability/moderate-payout lottery with a conditional fixed payment (payment promised following response). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Neither the low-probability nor high-probability lotteries improved response compared with no incentive. Unconditional fixed payments produced significantly greater response than actuarially equivalent lotteries, but conditional fixed payments did not. CONCLUSIONS: Lottery-based incentives do not improve clinicians' response rates compared with no incentives, and they are inferior to unconditional fixed payments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01264.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Financial incentives may act as a universal, simple, adaptable, alternative reinforcer.

    “Since many health-compromising behaviours have benefits that may vary across individuals, financial incentives may act as a universal, simple, adaptable, alternative reinforcer (Halpern et al., 2011; John et al., 2011, 2012; Kim et al., 2012; Kimmel et al., 2012; Kullgren et al., 2013; Loewenstein et al., 2013; Shea et al., 2012; Volpp et al., 2008, 2011).”

    From Addressing sleep disturbances: an opportunity to prevent cardiometabolic disease? (2014) · cites this paper as Halpern et al., 2011

  • Several studies have documented the benefits of financial incentives to change relatively intractable health-compromising behaviours.

    “As such, several studies have documented the benefits of financial incentives to change relatively intractable health-compromising behaviours (Cahill & Perera, 2011; Halpern et al., 2011; John et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2012; Kimmel et al., 2012; Kullgren et al., 2013; Volpp et al., 2008).”

    From Addressing sleep disturbances: an opportunity to prevent cardiometabolic disease? (2014) · cites this paper as Halpern et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). 2011. Standard Defi- nitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 7th Edition [accessed on March 8, 2011]. Available at http://www.aapor.org/Standard_ Definitions/3049.htm
  2. Haisley, E., K. G. Volpp, T. Pellathy, and G. Loewenstein. in press. ''Promoting Completion of Health Risk Assessments with Lottery Incentives.'' American Journal of Health Promotion.
  3. Halpern, S. D., S. A. Hussen, T. S. Metkus, N. S. Ward, J. M. Luce, and J. R. Curtis. 2007. ''Development of an Email Database of U.S. Intensive Care Physicians.'' Journal of Critical Care 22: 28-33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halpern, S. D., Kohn, R., Dornbrand-Lo, A., Metkus, T., Asch, D. A., & Volpp, K. G.
Affiliations
  • Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Halpern, Scott D.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-14
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
1663-1674
ISSN
0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111335450
Cited by
77
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
13.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Pennsylvania
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
lottery incentives, fixed payment, survey response rates, clinician participation, contingent payments, incentive design, conditional payments
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Choice Behavior, Humans, Motivation, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Token Economy, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review