Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 39

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attachment, partner choice, and perception of romantic partners: An experimental test of the attachment‐security hypothesis

CHAPPELL, KELLEY D., DAVIS, KEITH E.·1998·Personal Relationships

Abstract

We propose that the primary attachment process that influences partner choice is a normative one, the desire to form a secure attachment bond, and that a potential partner's attractiveness is, in part, a function of the degree to which the partner can offer the opportunity to form a secure attachment bond. An experimental test of the attachment‐security hypothesis was conducted with male and female (N= 282) heterosexual college students in the southeastern United States who had previously been classified as having one of four attachment styles: secure, preoccupied, fearful, or dismissive. Participants read scenarios (derived from Pietromonaco & Carnelley, 1994) that depicted a relationship with an opposite‐sex partner who displayed one of the four attachment styles, rated their reactions to the relationship, and assessed the imaginary partner on 20 personality traits. Results provided support for the attachment‐security hypothesis in two ways: (a) secure partners elicited more positive and less negative emotions than all other partners, followed by preoccupied partners, who elicited more positive emotions than either avoidant type, and (b) for the explicit choice of romantic partners, secure partners were preferred to all insecure types, who did not differ from each other. Both preoccupied and dismissive participants saw partners similar to themselves as more secure than did the other participants.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00175.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Aimworth M. D. S., 1978, Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation
  2. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00090.x · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bartholomew K., 1994, Attachment processes in young couples
  5. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00108.x · DOI
  6. Bowlby J., 1973, Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger
  7. Bowlby J., 1980, Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Byrne D., 1971, The attraction paradigm
  10. Cate R., 1992, Courtship
  11. 10.1177/0146167293196003 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Davis K. E., 1982, Advances in descriptive psychology, 79
  14. Feeney J.A., 1994, Attachment in adults: Theory, assessment and treatment, 128
  15. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00135.x · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00107.x · DOI
  17. Griffin D.W., 1994, Advances in personal relationships, 17
  18. Hatfield E., 1996, Love and sex: Cross‐cultural perspectives
  19. 10.1207/s15327965pli0501_1 · DOI
  20. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.673 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.502 · DOI
  22. Kobak R., 1991, Attachment in marriage: Effects of security and accuracy of working models, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 681, 10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.861 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0265407596131001 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.2307/2786317 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/088626097012003004 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00055.x · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00053.x · DOI
  28. 10.1177/0265407592091003 · DOI
  29. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Zeifman D., 1996, Evolutionary social psychology

Metadata

Authors
CHAPPELL, K. D., & DAVIS, K. E.
Venue
Personal Relationships
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-09
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
327-342
ISSN
  • 1350-4126
  • 1475-6811
Cited by
39
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attachment, partner choice, and perception of romantic partners: An experimental test of the attachment‐security hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00175.x
The paper
CHAPPELL, K. D., & DAVIS, K. E. (1998). Attachment, partner choice, and perception of romantic partners: An experimental test of the attachment‐security hypothesis. Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00175.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.