Cited by 57Attachment and Relationship DynamicsIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

The role of own and perceived partner attachment in relationship aggression

Bookwala, Jamila·2002·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

This study explored the main and interactive effects of respondents'own attachment styles and their perception of the romantic partner's attachment style on expressed and received aggression in a sample of 161 male and female undergraduates who reported on a heterosexual romantic relationship. Overall, 52.8% reported expressing at least one act of aggression, and 39.1% reported sustaining such an act from their partner. Regression analyses indicated that describing (a) one's partner as more preoccupied, (b) self and partner as more preoccupied, and (c) self as secure and partner as dismissing predicted higher levels of expressed aggression. Higher levels of sustained aggression were associated with describing (a) self as more fearful and partner as more preoccupied, (b) partner as more preoccupied, and (c) partner as less fearful. These results suggest that interpersonal perception may play an important role in the level of relation-ship aggression reported to occur in romantic relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260502017001006

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only four studies failed to find some kind of relationship between attachment and physical IPV victimization.

    “Considering the specific dimensions of attachment, only four studies failed to find some kind of relationship with physical IPV victimization (Bookwala, 2002; Orcutt et al., 2005; Shurman and Rodriguez, 2006; Rapoza and Baker, 2008).”
  • Studies investigating attachment matching in violent couples showed that couples where both partners have an anxious attachment are more prone to be violent.

    “studies investigating the attachment matching in violent couples showed that couples where both partner have an anxious attachment are more prone to be violent (Bookwala and Zdaniuk, 1998; Bookwala, 2002).”
  • The dismissing-anxious pattern seems to be the most common configuration in couples with one-sided IPV.

    “The dismissing-anxious pattern seems to be the most common configuration in couples with one-sided IPV (Bookwala, 2002; Frey et al., 2011; Wilson et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bookwala, J.
Affiliations
Lafayette College (US)
Corresponding author
Bookwala, Jamila
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2002-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
84-100
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2061026266
Cited by
57
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
relational aggression, attachment styles, self-attachment, romantic relationships, interpersonal perception, preoccupied attachment, dismissing attachment, fearful attachment, secure attachment, aggression perpetration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review