Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis by NG‐nitro‐L‐arginine methyl ester (L‐NAME): requirement for bioactivation to the free acid, NG‐nitro‐L‐arginine

Open access
Pfeiffer, Silvia, Leopold, Eva, Schmidt, Kurt, Brunner, Friedrich, Mayer, Bernd·1996·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

The L‐arginine derivatives N G‐nitro‐L‐arginine (L‐NOARG) and N G‐nitro‐L‐arginine methyl ester (L‐NAME) have been widely used to inhibit constitutive NO synthase (NOS) in different biological systems. This work was carried out to investigate whether L‐NAME is a direct inhibitor of NOS or requires preceding hydrolytic bioactivation to L‐NOARG for inhibition of the enzyme. A bolus of L‐NAME and L‐NOARG (0.25 μmol) increased coronary perfusion pressure of rat isolated hearts to the same extent (21 ± 0.8 mmHg; n = 5), but the effect developed more rapidly following addition of L‐NOARG than L‐NAME (mean half‐time: 0.7 vs. 4.2 min). The time‐dependent onset of the inhibitory effect of L‐NAME was paralleled by the appearance of L‐NOARG in the coronary effluent. Freshly dissolved L‐NAME was a 50 fold less potent inhibitor of purified brain NOS (mean IC 50 = 70 μ m) than L‐NOARG (IC 50 = 1.4 μ m), but the apparent inhibitory potency of L‐NAME approached that of L‐NOARG upon prolonged incubation at neutral or alkaline pH. H.p.l.c. analyses revealed that NOS inhibition by L‐NAME closely correlated with hydrolysis of the drug to L‐NOARG. Freshly dissolved L‐NAME contained 2% of L‐NOARG and was hydrolyzed with a half‐life of 365 ± 11.2 min in buffer (pH 7.4), 207 ± 1.7 min in human plasma, and 29 ± 2.2 min in whole blood (n = 3 in each case). When L‐NAME was preincubated in plasma or buffer, inhibition of NOS was proportional to formation of L‐NOARG, but in blood the inhibition was much less than expected from the rates of L‐NAME hydrolysis. This was explained by accumulation of L‐NOARG in blood cells. These results suggest that L‐NAME represents a prodrug lacking NOS inhibitory activity unless it is hydrolyzed to L‐NOARG. Bioactivation of L‐NAME proceeds at moderate rates in physiological buffers, but is markedly accelerated in tissues such as blood or vascular endothelium.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15557.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Pfeiffer, S., Leopold, E., Schmidt, K., Brunner, F., & Mayer, B.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-07
Volume
118
Issue
6
Pages
1433-1440
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W1999466346
Cited by
237
References
3
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis by NG‐nitro‐L‐arginine methyl ester (L‐NAME): requirement for bioactivation to the free acid, NG‐nitro‐L‐arginine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15557.x
The paper
Pfeiffer, S., Leopold, E., Schmidt, K., Brunner, F., & Mayer, B. (1996). Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis by NG‐nitro‐L‐arginine methyl ester (L‐NAME): requirement for bioactivation to the free acid, NG‐nitro‐L‐arginine. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15557.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.