The Determinants of Rural Livelihood Diversification in Developing Countries
Abstract
The diversity of rural livelihoods in low income developing countries is receiving increased attention in discussions about rural poverty reduction. This paper explores just one facet of livelihood diversity, namely the reasons for households to adopt multiple livelihood strategies. The distinction is made between diversification of necessity and diversification by choice. Six determinants of diversification are considered in the light of that distinction, and these are seasonality, risk, labour markets, credit markets, asset strategies, and coping strategies. The paper concludes that under the precarious conditions that characterise rural survival in many low income countries, diversification has positive attributes for livelihood security that outweigh negative connotations it may possess. Policy should facilitate rather than inhibit diversity. Diverse rural livelihoods are less vulnerable than undiversified ones.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher income diversity likely reduces intra- and interannual income variability and risk.
“likely because diversity helps to reduce intra-and interannual income variability and risk (Ellis 2000, de Sherbinin et al. 2008).”
From Explaining the persistence of low income and environmentally degrading land uses in the Brazilian Amazon (2017) · cites this paper as Ellis 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barrios, E., Gemmill-Herren, B., Bicksler, A., Siliprandi, E., Brathwaite, R., Moller, S., Batello, C., & Tittonell, P. (2020) · Ecosystems and People · doi:10.1080/26395916.2020.1808705 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Garrett, R. D., Gardner, T. A., Morello, T. F., Marchand, S., Barlow, J., Ezzine de Blas, D., Ferreira, J., Lees, A. C., & Parry, L. (2017) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09364-220327 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Creutzig, F., Corbera, E., Bolwig, S., & Hunsberger, C. (2013) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035047 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
An Analytical Framework for Assessing Context-Specific Rural Livelihood Vulnerability
Rahman, H. M. T., & Hickey, G. M. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12145654 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Kernecker, M., Vogl, C. R., & Aguilar Meléndez, A. (2017) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09787-220437 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Bauer, T., Ingram, V., De Jong, W., & Arts, B. (2018) · International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554818824063050 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ellis, F.
- Affiliations
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ellis, Frank
- ORCID
- Ellis, Frank
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 289-302
- ISSN
- 0021-857X (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9552
- OpenAlex
- W2042750568
- Cited by
- 1,312
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 84 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 50.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural risk and resilience
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
- Keywords
- rural livelihood diversification, rural poverty alleviation, livelihood security, seasonal variation, risk, labor market, credit markets, coping strategies, vulnerability, low-income developing countries, rural livelihoods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review