Cited by 35Tree-ring climate responsesGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

Environmental change during the Allerød and Younger Dryas reconstructed from Swiss tree‐ring data

SCHAUB, MATTHIAS, KAISER, KLAUS FELIX, FRANK, DAVID CHARLES, BÜNTGEN, ULF, KROMER, BERND, TALAMO, SAHRA·2008·Boreas

Abstract

Annually resolved tree‐ring width variations and radiocarbon ages were measured from a collection of 120 Lateglacial pine stumps excavated on the Swiss Plateau. These data – representing the oldest absolutely dated wood samples worldwide – extend the absolute tree‐ring chronology from Central Europe by 183 years back to 12 593 cal. yr BP (10 644 cal. yr BC). They also yield a 1420‐year floating chronology covering the entire Allerød and the early Younger Dryas (14 170–12 750 cal. yr BP). Radiocarbon data suggest a 250‐year jump in the 14 C reservoir correction around the time of the Allerød to Younger Dryas transition, although calendric dating of the floating chronology – by filling a ∼150 year gap – is necessary for confirmation. Various subgroups, based on the year of germination, were used to assess temporal changes in growth characteristics along the Allerød to Younger Dryas transition. Comparison of these Lateglacial data with a reference data set of living and historic pines from the Swiss Valais (AD 940–2000) revealed differences in both growth trend and level. The generally slower Lateglacial growth was likely influenced by higher geomorphic activity and severe climatic conditions. After removal of the biological age‐trend, a strong common signal found in the tree‐ring data suggests some skill in estimating interannual to multidecadal Lateglacial climatic variations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1502-3885.2007.00004.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SCHAUB, M., KAISER, K. F., FRANK, D. C., BÜNTGEN, U., KROMER, B., & TALAMO, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH)
  • Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities (DE)
Venue
Boreas
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09-18
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
74-86
ISSN
  • 0300-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-3885
OpenAlex
W2124741815
Cited by
35
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Boreas (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
Allerød, Younger Dryas, Late Glacial, tree-ring width, pine stumps, tree-ring chronology, radiocarbon dating, Swiss Plateau, dendroclimatology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review