Cited by 37Geology and Paleoclimatology ResearchArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesMarine and environmental studies

Comparison of 14C and U-Th Ages in Corals from IODP #310 Cores Offshore Tahiti

Open access
Durand, Nicolas, Deschamps, Pierre, Bard, Edouard, Hamelin, Bruno, Camoin, Gilbert, Thomas, Alexander L, Henderson, Gideon M, Yokoyama, Yusuke +1 more·2013·Radiocarbon

Abstract

Shallow-water tropical corals can be used to calibrate the radiocarbon timescale. In this paper, we present a new data set based on the comparison between 14 C ages and U-Th ages measured in fossil corals collected offshore the island of Tahiti during the Integrated Oceanic Drilling Program (IODP) Expedition 310. After applying strict mineralogical and geochemical screening criteria, the Tahiti record provides new data for 2 distinct time windows: 7 data for the interval between 29 and 37 cal kyr BP and 58 for the last deglaciation period, notably a higher resolution for the 14–16 cal kyr BP time interval. There are 3 main outcomes of this study. First, it extends the previous Tahiti record beyond 13.9 cal kyr BP, the oldest U-Th age obtained on cores drilled onshore in the modern Tahiti barrier reef. Second, it strengthens the data set of the 14–15 cal kyr BP period, allowing for better documentation of the 14 C age plateau in this time range. This age plateau corresponds to a drop of the atmospheric 14 C synchronous with an abrupt period of sea-level rise (Melt Water Pulse 1 A, MWP-1 A). The Tahiti 14 C record documents complex changes in the global carbon cycle due to variations in the exchange rates between its different reservoirs. Third, during the Heinrich event 1, the Tahiti record disagrees with the Cariaco record, but is in broad agreement with other marine and continental data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2458/azu_js_rc.v55i2.16134

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A coral data point from Tahiti at 31 cal kBP is an outlier.

    “In addition, a coral data point from Tahiti at 31 cal kBP is obviously an outlier as presented and discussed in Durand et al. (2013).”

    From The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP) (2020) · cites this paper as Durand et al. 2013

    In “Comparison with Previous Data Sets” (page not provided), the paper identifies the Tahiti sample around 31 kyr BP as disagreeing with nearby Tahiti and Barbados data. It says the sample “can probably be considered an outlier,” which supports the identification but is less certain than “obviously an outlier.” (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 98 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [1]1. Andersen MB, Stirling CH, Potter E-K, Halliday AN. 2004. Toward epsilon levels of measurement preci- sion on 234 U/ 238 U by using MC-ICPMS. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 237:107-18.
  2. [7]7. Bard E, Arnold M, Fairbanks RG, Hamelin B. 1993. 230 Th/ 234 U and 14 C ages obtained by mass spectrome- try on corals. Radiocarbon 35(1):191-9.
  3. [14]14. Butzin M, Prange M, Lohmann G. 2012. Readjustment of glacial radiocarbon chronology by self-consistent three-dimensional ocean circulation modeling. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 317-318:177-84.
  4. [16]16. Camoin GF, Iryu Y, McInroy D, and the Expedition 310 scientists. 2007a. Proceedings of the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management. Volume 310: College Station: IODP International, Inc.
  5. [20]20. Chen JH, Curran HA, White B, Wasserburg GJ. 1991. Precise chronology of the last interglacial period: 234 U-230 Th data from fossil coral reefs in the Bahamas. Geological Society of America Bulletin 103(1):82-97.
  6. [24]24. Cowan GA, Adler HH. 1976. The variability of the nat- ural abundance of 235 U. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 40(12):1487-90.
  7. [60]60. Mook WG, van der Plicht J. 1999. Reporting 14 C activi- ties and concentrations. Radiocarbon 41(3):227-39.
  8. [69]69. Reimer PJ, Baillie MGL, McCormac G, Reimer RW, Bard E, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Buck CE, Burr GS, Edwards RL, Friedrich M, Guilderson TP, Manning S, Guilderson TP, Southon JR, Hogg AG, Stuiver M, Hughen KA, van der Plicht J, Kromer B, van der Plicht J, Manning S, Weyhenmeyer CE. 2006. Comment on "Radiocarbon calibration curve spanning 0 to 50,000 years BP based on paired 230 Th/ 234 U/ 238 U and 14 C dates on pristine corals" by R.G. Fairbanks et al. (Qua- ternary Science Reviews 24 (2005) 1781-1796) and "Extending the radiocarbon calibration beyond 26,000 years before present using fossil corals" by T.- C. Chin et al. (Quaternary Science Reviews 24 (2005) 1797-1808). Quaternary Science Reviews 25(7-8): 855-62.
  9. [87]87. Weyer S, Anbar AD, Gerdes A, Gordon GW, Algeo TJ, Boyle EA. 2008. Natural fractionation of 238 U/ 235 U. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 72(2):345-59.
  10. [92]92. C measurements. 14 C ages are conventional ages with a reservoir correction of 300 yr. (Continued) Sample Lab code 14 C age (yr BP) ±2 https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.v55i2.16134 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Durand, N., Deschamps, P., Bard, E., Hamelin, B., Camoin, G., Thomas, A. L., Henderson, G. M., Yokoyama, Y., & Matsuzaki, H.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Durand, Nicolas
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
2013
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
1947-1974
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W2042671618
Cited by
33
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Comer Science and Education Foundation
  • Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
  • Equipex
  • University of Oxford
  • European Science Foundation
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-EQPX-0024)
  • University of Tokyo
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/D001250/1)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (GR031)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and environmental studies
Keywords
radiocarbon calibration, U-Th dating, fossil corals, Tahiti, IODP Expedition 310, last deglaciation, sea level rise, carbon cycle, Heinrich event 1, Cariaco Basin, tropical corals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review