The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
YOU JUST BELIEVE THAT BECAUSE…1
Open accessAbstract
1. Introduction I believe that Tom is the proud father of a baby boy. Why do I think his child is a boy? A natural answer might be that I remember that his name is ‘Owen’ which is usually a boy’s name. Here I’ve given information that might be part of a causal explanation of my believing that Tom’s baby is a boy. I do have such a memory and it is largely what sustains my conviction. But I haven’t given you just any causally relevant information, I’ve given my grounds for my belief. I’ve given reasons that might justify me in supposing that Tom’s baby is a boy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Johnson, K., & Nozick, R. (1975) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/447864 · Cited by 7,692
(2000) · Cited by 5,055
Goldman, A. I., & Nozick, R. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184523 · Cited by 2,039
WHAT THE TORTOISE SAID TO ACHILLES
CARROLL, L. (1895) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/iv.14.278 · Cited by 1,417
Plantinga, A. (2000) · doi:10.1093/0195131932.001.0001 · Cited by 1,291
A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value
Street, S. (2006) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-005-1726-6 · Cited by 1,247
Breaking the spell: religion as a natural phenomenon
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-3244 · Cited by 1,126
If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You’re So Rich?
Cohen, G. A. (2001) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674029668 · Cited by 1,053
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
Hume, D. (1777) · David Hume: Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals (Third Edition) · doi:10.1093/oseo/instance.00046350 · Cited by 972
Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News
Christensen, D. (2007) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-2006-035 · Cited by 970
Cited by
VII — Genealogy, Epistemology and Worldmaking
Srinivasan, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society · doi:10.1093/arisoc/aoz009 · Cited by 157
A Culturally Sensitive Test to Evaluate Nuanced GPT Hallucination
McIntosh, T. R., Liu, T., Susnjak, T., Watters, P., Ng, A., & Halgamuge, M. N. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2023.3332837 · Cited by 145
Clarke-Doane, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823667.001.0001 · Cited by 146
Dorst, K. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3918498 · Cited by 108
Against Minimalist Responses to Moral Debunking Arguments
Korman, D. Z., & Locke, D. (2020) · Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 15 · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198859512.003.0014 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- White, R.
- Venue
- Philosophical Perspectives
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 573-615
- ISSN
- 1520-8583 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1507323185
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 21.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: YOU JUST BELIEVE THAT BECAUSE…1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00204.x
- The paper
- White, R. (2010). YOU JUST BELIEVE THAT BECAUSE…1. Philosophical Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00204.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.