The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Road Clearings on Movement Patterns of Understory Rainforest Birds in Central Amazonia
Abstract
Abstract: The impacts of potential linear barriers such as roads, highways, and power lines on rainforest fauna are poorly understood. In the central Brazilian Amazon, we compared the frequency of local movements (≤300 m long) of understory birds within intact forest and across a 30‐ to 40‐m‐wide road over a 2‐year period. Rainforest had regenerated along some road verges, to the extent that a nearly complete canopy was formed in some areas, so we also assessed whether this facilitated bird movement. Movement data were determined from 1212 recaptures of 3681 netted birds at six study sites. The road significantly inhibited total bird movement across roads at five of the six sites. Bird foraging guilds varied in their responses to the road and different ages of regrowth. Movements of frugivorous and edge and gap species were not inhibited at any site, whereas most forest‐dependent insectivores (mixed‐species flocks, terrestrial species, and army‐ant followers) had markedly inhibited road‐crossing movements, except at sites with extensive regrowth. Solitary understory species were especially vulnerable, rarely crossing even roads overgrown by tall regrowth. For sensitive species, road‐crossing movements were inhibited because individuals tended to avoid both edge‐affected habitat near the road and the road clearing itself. Our results suggest that even narrow roads with low traffic volumes can reduce local movements of many insectivorous birds in Amazonia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of Amazonian Forest Fragments by Understory Insectivorous Birds
Stouffer, P. C., & Bierregaard, R. O. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265818 · Cited by 609
Self-citationLocal Extinctions of Terrestrial Insectivorous Birds in a Fragmented Landscape near Manaus, Brazil
Stratford, J. A., & Stouffer, P. C. (1999) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98494.x · Cited by 251 · cited 3×
“These species often decline in abundance near forest edges, avoid clearings (S. G. W. Laurance 2001), and are highly vulnerable to forest fragmentation (Bierregaard & Lovejoy 1989; Stouffer & Bierregaard 1995; Stratford & Stouffer 1999).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citation
Cited by
Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests
Laurance, W. F., Goosem, M., & Laurance, S. G. W. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.009 · Cited by 1,243
Self-citationRoads, deforestation, and the mitigating effect of protected areas in the Amazon
Barber, C. P., Cochrane, M. A., Souza, C. M., & Laurance, W. F. (2014) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.004 · Cited by 667
Self-citationFeedback in tropical forests of the Anthropocene
Flores, B. M., & Staal, A. (2022) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16293 · Cited by 59
Wilson, R. F., Marsh, H., & Winter, J. (2007) · Wildlife Research · doi:10.1071/wr06114 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- LAURANCE, S. G. W., STOUFFER, P. C., & LAURANCE, W. F.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-23
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1099-1109
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2076704063
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.