The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resurfacing of Atrophic Facial Acne Scars with a High-Energy, Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment of atrophic acne scars has been limited to the use of such traditional treatments as dermabrasion and chemical peels for many years. Recently, the addition of high-energy, pulsed carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers to the treatment armentarium has created renewed enthusiasm for cutaneous resurfacing due to their ability to create specific thermal injury with limited side effects. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a high-energy, pulsed CO2 laser in eliminating atrophic facial scars and to observe for side effects. METHODS: Fifty patients with skin phototypes I-V and moderate to severe atrophic facial acne scars were included in the study. Each patient received one high-energy, pulsed CO2 laser treatment using identical laser parameters by the same experienced laser surgeon. Baseline and 1-, 4-, 8-, 12-, and 24-week postoperative photographs and clinical assessments were obtained in all patients. Textural analysis of skin before and after laser irradiation were obtained in 10 patients to confirm clinical impressions. Clinical evaluations were conducted independently by two blinded assessors. RESULTS: There was an 81.4% average clinical improvement observed in acne scars following laser treatment. Skin texture measurements of laser-irradiated scars were comparable to those obtained in normal adjacent skin. Side effects were limited to transient hyperpigmentation lasting an average of 3 months in 36% of patients. Prolonged erythema (2 months average) was usual and considered to be a normal healing response. No hypertrophic scarring was observed following laser treatment. CONCLUSION: High-energy, pulsed CO2 laser treatment can safely and effectively improve or even eliminate atrophic facial scars and provides many benefits over traditional treatment methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The spectrum of laser skin resurfacing: Nonablative, fractional, and ablative laser resurfacing
Alexiades-Armenakas, M. R., Dover, J. S., & Arndt, K. A. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.01.003 · Cited by 580
Complications of Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing. An Evaluation of 500 Patients
NANNI, C. A., & ALSTER, T. S. (1998) · Dermatologic Surgery · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.1998.tb04161.x · Cited by 489
Self-citationAcne Scars: Pathogenesis, Classification and Treatment
Fabbrocini, G., Annunziata, M. C., D′Arco, V., De Vita, V., Lodi, G., Mauriello, M. C., Pastore, F., & Monfrecola, G. (2010) · Dermatology Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/2010/893080 · Cited by 440
The Use of Fractional Laser Photothermolysis for the Treatment of Atrophic Scars
ALSTER, T. S., TANZI, E. L., & LAZARUS, M. (2007) · Dermatologic Surgery · doi:10.1097/00042728-200703000-00006 · Cited by 333
Self-citationAlster, T. S. (1999) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-199902000-00040 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ALSTER, T. S., & WEST, T. B.
- Venue
- Dermatologic Surgery
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-155
- ISSN
- 1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008778991
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resurfacing of Atrophic Facial Acne Scars with a High-Energy, Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1996.tb00497.x
- The paper
- ALSTER, T. S., & WEST, T. B. (1996). Resurfacing of Atrophic Facial Acne Scars with a High-Energy, Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser. Dermatologic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1996.tb00497.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.