Cited by 157Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major Depression

Health-related quality of life measured with EQ-5D in patients treated for depression in primary care

Open access
Sobocki, Patrik, Ekman, Mattias, Ågren, Hans, Krakau, Ingvar, Runeson, Bo, Mårtensson, Björn, Jönsson, Bengt·2007·Value in Health

Abstract

Objective The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of depression on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) with the EQ-5D instrument over 6 months while on antidepressant treatment.Methods A total of 447 patients were recruited at 56 primary care centers to this naturalistic longitudinal observational study. Patients older than 18 years with depressive symptoms, and who initiated an antidepressant therapy because of depression were included in the study. Data on patients' sociodemographics, daily activity, and quality of life (EQ-5D) were collected using questionnaires completed during outpatient general practitioner visits for a follow-up period of 6 months.Results The mean EQ-5D utility score at baseline was 0.47 (0.44-0.49). Milder cases of depression reported a health utility of 0.60, whereas moderately and severely depressed patients reported utility values of 0.46 and 0.27, respectively (P < 0.01). At end of follow up the average utility was 0.69 (0.67-0.72), corresponding to an increase of 0.23 over 6 months (P < 0.01). Regression analyses showed that, all else equal, patients who were on sick leave were associated with 10% lower utility.Conclusions Depression has a substantial impact on HRQL. Our results indicate that treatments for depression are associated with significant improvement in EQ-5D index score over a course of 6 months. Self-reported patient valuations are important outcomes for cost-utility analysis of new treatments for depression and the present study provides important evidence for future economic evaluations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00162.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sobocki, P., Ekman, M., Ågren, H., Krakau, I., Runeson, B., Mårtensson, B., & Jönsson, B.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Stockholm School of Economics (SE)
Venue
Value in Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
153-160
ISSN
1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963551867
Cited by
157
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
22.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Value in Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
depression, health-related quality of life, EQ-5D, antidepressant treatment, primary care, health utility, sick leave, depression severity, cost-utility analysis, economic evaluation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Demography, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Sweden, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Sickness Impact Profile, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review