Cited by 85Wound Healing and TreatmentsSkin and Cellular Biology ResearchElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Keratin dressings speed epithelialization of deep partial-thickness wounds

Pechter, Patricia M., Gil, Joel, Valdes, Jose, Tomic‐Canic, Marjana, Pastar, Irena, Stojadinovic, Olivera, Kirsner, Robert S., Davis, Stephen C.·2012·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

Keratin gene expression is regarded as a hallmark of epidermal biology. It demarcates the three keratinocyte phenotypes: basal (expressing KRT5 and KRT14), differentiating (expressing KRT1 and KRT10), and activated (wound healing), which is characterized by expression of KRT6, KRT16, and KRT17. Activated keratinocytes are among the first signals of epidermal wound healing. In addition, they are found deregulated in nonhealing chronic wounds. To examine keratins as a potential modality for wound‐healing disorders, we evaluated two different keratin dressings, liquid or solid, and assessed their effects of epithelialization and closure using porcine partial‐thickness wound‐healing model in vivo. We found that both forms of keratin dressings accelerated closure and epithelialization, achieving statistically significant differences on day 5. Evidence suggesting early onset of epithelialization was corroborated further by gene expression analyses revealing induction of KRT6A, KRT16, and KRT17 by day 2 postwounding. The data suggest that keratin dressings may stimulate epithelialization by enhancing the activation of keratinocytes. We conclude that keratin‐containing dressings can accelerate wound healing and closure. Further studies are needed to determine the molecular mechanisms of this activation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-475x.2012.00768.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pechter, P. M., Gil, J., Valdes, J., Tomic‐Canic, M., Pastar, I., Stojadinovic, O., Kirsner, R. S., & Davis, S. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Department of Dermatology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami FL USA
Corresponding author
Davis, Stephen C.
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-14
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
236-242
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W1962770059
Cited by
85
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
re-epithelialization, partial-thickness wounds, keratinocyte activation, keratin gene expression, KRT6A, keratin 16, keratin 17, wound healing, wound closure, chronic wounds, porcine wound model
MeSH terms
Animals, Bandages, Female, Keratins, Skin, Swine, Wound Healing, Keratinocytes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review