Cited by 454Dermatology and Skin DiseasesSkin and Cellular Biology ResearchComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

The Skin of Domestic Mammals as a Model for the Human Skin, with Special Reference to the Domestic Pig1

Meyer, W., Schwarz, R., Neurand, K.·2015·Current Problems in Dermatology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000401274

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer, W., Schwarz, R., & Neurand, K.
Affiliations
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (DE)
Venue
Current Problems in Dermatology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2015-04-16
Volume
7
Pages
39-52
ISSN
  • 1421-5721 (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-2944
OpenAlex
W22120313
Cited by
454
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
126.30
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current problems in dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
skin, domestic mammals, human skin model, domestic pigs, porcine skin, comparative dermatology
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Dogs, Epidermis, Hair, Histocytochemistry, Humans, Models, Biological, Sebaceous Glands, Skin, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Species Specificity, Sweat Glands, Swine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review