Cited by 178Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement DisordersObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Brain Stimulation Devices: A Brief Technical History and Review

Coffey, Robert J.·2009·Artificial Organs

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS)—a broadly accepted therapeutic modality with tens of thousands of patients currently implanted—is the application of implantable electrical stimulation devices to treat neurological disorders. Approved indications include involuntary movement disorders; investigational applications include epilepsy, selected psychiatric disorders, and other conditions. DBS differs fundamentally from functional electrical stimulation and sensory prosthetics in that DBS therapies do not substitute for or replace injured tissues, organs, or body functions. DBS—targeted to particular brain nuclei or pathways that are specific for the disorder under treatment—influences brain function and behavioral output in ways that can relieve symptoms and improve the overall functioning of the patient. We will briefly review the history and present status of DBS from a technical and device‐oriented perspective, with an eye toward future advances.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00620.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Olds J., 1960, Electrical Studies on the Unanesthetized Brain, 17
  2. Pool JL, 1956, Hypothalamic‐hypophysical Interrelationships
  3. Sheer DE., 1961, Electrical Stimulation of the Brain. An Interdisciplinary Survey of Neurobehavioral Integrative Systems
  4. Mazars GJ, 1974, Traitement de certain types de douleurs pars de stimulateurs thalamiques implantables, Neurochirurgie, 20, 117
  5. Dodge HW., 1960, Electrical Studies on the Unanesthetized Brain, 262
  6. Sheatz GC., 1961, Electrical Stimulation of the Brain. An Interdisciplinary Survey of Neurobehavioral Integrative Systems, 45
  7. Spiegel EA, 1961, Electrical Stimulation of the Brain. An Interdisciplinary Survey of Neurobehavioral Integrative Systems, 37
  8. Lilly JC., 1961, Electrical Stimulation of the Brain. An Interdisciplinary Survey of Neurobehavioral Integrative Systems, 60
  9. Elsevier Inc. Brain Stimulation journal homepage. Available at:http://www.brainstimjrnl.com/home. Accessed February 18 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Coffey, R. J.
Affiliations
Medtronic (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Coffey, Robert J.
Venue
Artificial Organs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-23
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
208-220
ISSN
  • 0160-564X (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1594
OpenAlex
W2069938205
Cited by
178
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Artificial Organs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, neurological disorders, movement disorders, epilepsy, mental illness, neurostimulation, device technology
MeSH terms
Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Deep Brain Stimulation, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review