Cited by 155Hydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFish Ecology and Management StudiesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

River restoration in Victoria, Australia: Change is in the wind, and none too soon

Brooks, Shane S., Lake, P. Sam·2007·Restoration Ecology

Abstract

Stream restoration has become a multibillion dollar industry worldwide, yet there are few clear success stories and the scientific basis for effective stream restoration remains uncertain. We compiled data on completed river restoration projects from four management authorities in Victoria, Australia, to examine how the available data could inform the science of restoration ecology in rivers, and thus improve future restoration efforts. We found that existing data sources are limited and much historical information has been lost through industry restructuring and poor data archiving. Examining records for 2,247 restoration projects, we found that riparian management projects were the most common, followed by bank stabilization and in‐stream habitat improvement. Only 14% of the project records indicated that some form of monitoring was carried out. It is evident that overall there is little scientific guidance and little or no monitoring and evaluation of the projects for which we had information. However, recent advances with mandatory, statewide reporting and an increased emphasis on project design and monitoring strongly suggest that the design, implementation, monitoring, and reporting of stream restoration projects have improved in recent years and will continue to do so.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2007.00253.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Documentation and efficiency analysis of river restoration projects have been strongly neglected in the Global North for a long time.

    “Documentation and efficiency analysis of river restoration projects have been strongly neglected in the Global North for a long time (e.g., Europe [16][17][18][19], Australia [20] and North America [21,22]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brooks, S. S., & Lake, P. S.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Venue
Restoration Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07-26
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
584-591
ISSN
  • 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-100X
OpenAlex
W2021191784
Cited by
155
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Restoration Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
State Government of Victoria
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Keywords
river restoration, stream restoration, restoration monitoring, restoration evaluation, riparian management, bank stabilization, data archiving, mandatory reporting, restoration science, Victoria, Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review