The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Reintroduction to Assisted Colonization: Moving along the Conservation Translocation Spectrum
Open accessAbstract
Translocation, the intentional movement of living organisms from one area to another is increasingly being used as a conservation tool to overcome barriers to dispersal. A dichotomy exists for conservation-oriented translocations: on one hand, there are those that release plants or animals into known historic ranges and on the other hand, there are releases outside historic distributions. Misuse of or attempts to redefine established terms and a proliferation of variants of new terms such as assisted colonization, confuse and hamper communication. The aim of this opinion article is to describe and define a conservation translocation spectrum, from species reintroductions to assisted colonization, and beyond, and in so doing provide a standard framework and terminology for discussing translocation options. I suggest that we are moving along this spectrum, away from the dictates of historical species distribution records, toward the inclusion of more risky interventions that will be required to respond to habitat shifts due to anthropogenic impacts. To some extent rapid climate change changes everything, including how we should view introductions versus reintroductions. We need to seriously consider adding other approaches to our conservation toolbox. Assisted colonization will start us along this path, acknowledging as it does the accelerated rate of habitat change and the problems of attempting to preserve dynamic systems. The next step along the conservation translocation spectrum may be for reintroduction biology and restoration ecology to more comprehensively join forces on carefully selected projects to use species introductions to create novel ecosystems through active ecological community construction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Restoration Ecology: Repairing the Earth’s Ecosystems in the New Millennium
Hobbs, R. J., & Harris, J. A. (2001) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002239.x · Cited by 905
Cited by
Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective
Weeks, A. R., Sgro, C. M., Young, A. G., Frankham, R., Mitchell, N. J., Miller, K. A., Byrne, M., Coates, D. J., Eldridge, M. D. B., Sunnucks, P., et al. (2011) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00192.x · Cited by 916
Fuller, A., Mitchell, D., Maloney, S. K., & Hetem, R. S. (2016) · Climate Change Responses · doi:10.1186/s40665-016-0024-1 · Cited by 207
Jacobs, D. F., Dalgleish, H. J., & Nelson, C. D. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12020 · Cited by 183
Znidersic, E., & Watson, D. M. (2022) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.14015 · Cited by 44
Weyer, N. M. (2018) · Unpublished · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.11625.40809 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Seddon, P. J.
- Venue
- Restoration Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-31
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 796-802
- ISSN
- 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061010881
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Reintroduction to Assisted Colonization: Moving along the Conservation Translocation Spectrum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2010.00724.x
- The paper
- Seddon, P. J. (2010). From Reintroduction to Assisted Colonization: Moving along the Conservation Translocation Spectrum. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2010.00724.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.