CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 261Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Opioid Use

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ethnic Similarities and Differences in the Chronic Pain Experience: A Comparison of African American, Hispanic, and White Patients

Edwards, Robert R., Moric, Mario, Husfeldt, Brenda, Buvanendran, Asokumar, Ivankovich, Olga·2005·Pain Medicine
DOI 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.05007.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ethnic differences in the perception, experience, and impact of pain have received growing attention in recent years. Although studies comparing pain among African Americans, Hispanics, and whites have yielded mixed findings, increasing evidence suggests an enhancement of the pain experience for African American and Hispanic patients. Mechanisms proposed to account for this effect include systematic differences in psychological distress and in pain-coping strategies, or differential relationships between these factors and pain. However, few studies have evaluated all of these variables, or matched ethnic groups precisely on potential confounds. DESIGN: The present study compares African American, Hispanic, and white chronic pain patients across multiple dimensions of pain, emotional distress, pain-related disability, and pain coping after matching patients on a variety of potentially confounding variables. RESULTS: Results indicated no significant ethnic differences on measures of pain, depression, psychopathology, or pain-related disability. While most coping variables did not differ by ethnicity, substantive group differences were evident on the praying and hoping subscale of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire, with African Americans and Hispanics reporting higher scores relative to whites on items relating to prayer. Inter-relationships among pain, coping, and distress were generally quite similar across ethnic groups, although active coping showed some variation in its relationship with pain-related outcomes. Catastrophizing was generally associated with greater pain and distress, and use of prayer/hope as a coping strategy was associated with greater disability across ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ethnic differences in pain, pain-related sequelae, and affective factors may be small when ethnic groups are closely matched on confounding variables. Moreover, interventions designed to facilitate adaptive coping are likely to be effective across ethnic groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.05007.x

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1097/00007632-200302150-00016 · DOI
  2. Moore R Brodsgaard I . Cross-cultural investigations of pain. In: Croft PR Linton SJ LeResche L Von Korff M , editors. Epidemiology of pain. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 1999: 53–80.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 261

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Edwards, R. R., Moric, M., Husfeldt, B., Buvanendran, A., & Ivankovich, O.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Robert R.
ORCID
Venue
Pain Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2005-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
88-98
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
DOI
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.05007.x
OpenAlex
W2034918451
Cited by
261
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
chronic pain, ethnic differences, African Americans, Hispanic patients, Caucasian patients, pain-related disability, pain coping, catastrophizing, depression, psychopathology, Coping Strategies Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Black or African American, Chronic Disease, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review