CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 130Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationDigital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

painACTION-Back Pain: A Self-Management Website for People with Chronic Back Pain

Chiauzzi, Emil, Pujol, Lynette A., Wood, Mollie, Bond, Kathleen, Black, Ryan, Yiu, Elizabeth, Zacharoff, Kevin·2010·Pain Medicine
DOI 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00879.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an interactive self-management Website for people with chronic back pain would significantly improve emotional management, coping, self-efficacy to manage pain, pain levels, and physical functioning compared with standard text-based materials. DESIGN: The study utilized a pretest-posttest randomized controlled design comparing Website (painACTION-Back Pain) and control (text-based material) conditions at baseline and at 1-, 3, and 6-month follow-ups. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and nine people with chronic back pain were recruited through dissemination of study information online and at a pain treatment clinic. The 6-month follow-up rates for the Website and control groups were 73% and 84%, respectively. MEASUREMENTS: Measures were based on the recommendations of the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials and included measures of pain intensity, physical functioning, emotional functioning, coping, self-efficacy, fear-avoidance, perceived improvement with treatment, self-efficacy, and catastrophizing. RESULTS: Compared with controls, painACTION-Back Pain participants reported significantly: 1) lower stress; 2) increased coping self-statements; and 3) greater use of social support. Comparisons between groups suggested clinically significant differences in current pain intensity, depression, anxiety, stress, and global ratings of improvement. Among participants recruited online, those using the Website reported significantly: 1) lower "worst" pain; 2) lower "average" pain; and 3) increased coping self-statements, compared with controls. Participants recruited through the pain clinic evidenced no such differences. CONCLUSIONS: An online self-management program for people with chronic back pain can lead to improvements in stress, coping, and social support, and produce clinically significant differences in pain, depression, anxiety, and global rates of improvement.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00879.x

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1097/00007632-200302150-00017 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–129 of 129

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chiauzzi, E., Pujol, L. A., Wood, M., Bond, K., Black, R., Yiu, E., & Zacharoff, K.
Affiliations
  • Inflexxion (United States) (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Chiauzzi, Emil
ORCID
Venue
Pain Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2010-07
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
1044-1058
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
DOI
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00879.x
OpenAlex
W1946234620
Cited by
130
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 1888 d)
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Small Business Innovation Research
  • National Institutes of Health (5r44da022802-03)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (9R44DA022802-02, R44 DA022802)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
chronic back pain, self-management, online intervention, coping, stress, social support, pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, pain intensity, physical function, self-efficacy, online health education
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Back Pain, Humans, Pain Measurement, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Social Support, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review