The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
painACTION-Back Pain: A Self-Management Website for People with Chronic Back Pain
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an interactive self-management Website for people with chronic back pain would significantly improve emotional management, coping, self-efficacy to manage pain, pain levels, and physical functioning compared with standard text-based materials. DESIGN: The study utilized a pretest-posttest randomized controlled design comparing Website (painACTION-Back Pain) and control (text-based material) conditions at baseline and at 1-, 3, and 6-month follow-ups. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and nine people with chronic back pain were recruited through dissemination of study information online and at a pain treatment clinic. The 6-month follow-up rates for the Website and control groups were 73% and 84%, respectively. MEASUREMENTS: Measures were based on the recommendations of the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials and included measures of pain intensity, physical functioning, emotional functioning, coping, self-efficacy, fear-avoidance, perceived improvement with treatment, self-efficacy, and catastrophizing. RESULTS: Compared with controls, painACTION-Back Pain participants reported significantly: 1) lower stress; 2) increased coping self-statements; and 3) greater use of social support. Comparisons between groups suggested clinically significant differences in current pain intensity, depression, anxiety, stress, and global ratings of improvement. Among participants recruited online, those using the Website reported significantly: 1) lower "worst" pain; 2) lower "average" pain; and 3) increased coping self-statements, compared with controls. Participants recruited through the pain clinic evidenced no such differences. CONCLUSIONS: An online self-management program for people with chronic back pain can lead to improvements in stress, coping, and social support, and produce clinically significant differences in pain, depression, anxiety, and global rates of improvement.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In terms of performance bias, all studies except for 2 (low and unclear risks) [48,52] presented a high risk in regard to blinding of participants, which was also the case for detection bias.”
From Tailored web-based interventions for pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“The 2 studies included in this analysis were quite different [46,52].”
From Tailored web-based interventions for pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cites
(1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,899
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.
Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524 · Cited by 8,227
Farrar, J. T., Young, J. P., LaMoreaux, L., Werth, J. L., & Poole, M. R. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00349-9 · Cited by 5,808
Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.
Cs, C., & Km, R. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 5,178
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
Fairbank, J. C. T., Couper, J., Davies, J. B., & O'Brien, J. P. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-29805-2_3023 · Cited by 3,954
Patient Self-management of Chronic Disease in Primary Care
Bodenheimer, T. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.19.2469 · Cited by 3,598
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Wyrwich, K. W., Beaton, D., Cleeland, C. S., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Kerns, R. D., Ader, D. N., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005 · Cited by 3,471
Waddell, G., Newton, M., Henderson, I., Somerville, D., & Main, C. J. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-b · Cited by 3,167
Moher, D. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.15.1987 · Cited by 2,545
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
Fairbank, J. C. T., Couper, J., Davies, J. B., & O'Brien, J. P. (2020) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t04205-000 · Cited by 2,033
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1097/00007632-200302150-00017 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychological therapies (Internet-delivered) for the management of chronic pain in adults
Eccleston, C., Fisher, E., Craig, L., Duggan, G. B., Rosser, B. A., & Keogh, E. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010152.pub2 · Cited by 271
Rogers, M. A., Lemmen, K., Kramer, R., Mann, J., & Chopra, V. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7111 · Cited by 259
Beatty, L., & Lambert, S. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.03.004 · Cited by 244
Schütze, R., Rees, C., Smith, A., Slater, H., Campbell, J. M., & O'Sullivan, P. (2018) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2017.09.010 · Cited by 231
Internet interventions for chronic pain including headache: a systematic review
Buhrman, M., Gordh, T., & Andersson, G. (2016) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2015.12.001 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiauzzi, E., Pujol, L. A., Wood, M., Bond, K., Black, R., Yiu, E., & Zacharoff, K.
- Affiliations
- Inflexxion (United States) (US)
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chiauzzi, Emil
- Venue
- Pain Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1044-1058
- ISSN
- 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4637
- OpenAlex
- W1946234620
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Small Business Innovation Research
- National Institutes of Health (5r44da022802-03)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (9R44DA022802-02, R44 DA022802)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- chronic back pain, self-management, online intervention, coping, stress, social support, pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, pain intensity, physical function, self-efficacy, online health education
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Back Pain, Humans, Pain Measurement, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Social Support, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
