The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense
Abstract
Feminist epistemology has often been understood as the study of feminine “ways of knowing.” But feminist epistemology is better understood as the branch of naturalized, social epistemology that studies the various influences of norms and conceptions of gender and gendered interests and experiences on the production of knowledge. This understanding avoids dubious claims about feminine cognitive differences and enables feminist research in various disciplines to pose deep internal critiques of mainstream research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Outline of a Theory of Practice
Bourdieu, P. (1977) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812507 · Cited by 27,606
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,545
(1976) · Cited by 10,423
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development
GILLIGAN, C. (1993) · doi:10.4159/9780674037618 · Cited by 9,127
(1960) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,851
The psychology of sex differences
(1975) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(75)80031-1 · Cited by 5,488
The science question in feminism
Waters, K. (1987) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/0277-5395(87)90077-x · Cited by 3,804
Ontological Relativity and Other Essays
Quine, W. V. (1969) · doi:10.7312/quin92204 · Cited by 3,593
The Science Question in Feminism
Harding, S. (1986) · Cornell University Press eBooks · Cited by 3,229
Cited by
25 Years of Feminist Empiricism and Standpoint Theory: Where Are We Now?
Intemann, K. (2010) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01138.x · Cited by 331
Citizen Knowledge: Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy
Herzog, L. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197681718.001.0001 · Cited by 80
Deaf Epistemology: The Deaf Way of Knowing
Holcomb, T. K. (2010) · American Annals of the Deaf · doi:10.1353/aad.0.0116 · Cited by 77
Watson, L. (2016) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12316 · Cited by 39
Relativising epistemic advantage
Ashton, N. (2019) · The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism · doi:10.4324/9781351052306-36 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, E.
- Venue
- Hypatia
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 50-84
- ISSN
- 0887-5367 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-2001
- OpenAlex
- W2036484382
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb00737.x
- The paper
- Anderson, E. (1995). Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense. Hypatia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb00737.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.