Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Outcomes of Add‐on Treatment with Lamotrigine in Partial Epilepsy

Smith, D., Baker, G., Davies, G., Dewey, M., Chadwick, D. W.·1993·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: The need for new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and more sensitive methods of assessing their efficacy is well recognized. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG), a potential new AED and to develop and test new outcome measures. A health‐related quality of life (HRQL) model was developed which contains previously validated measures of anxiety, depression, happiness, overall mood, self‐esteem, and mastery and a specifically designed seizure severity scale with patient‐ and caregiver‐based components. This HRQL model was used in a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, cross‐over study of LTG in 81 patients with refractory partial seizures. Seizure frequency was the primary measure and seizure severity and the HRQL were secondary measures of efficacy. The reduction in seizure frequency with LTG, relative to placebo, was 29.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17.8%, 39.9%] for total seizure count, 33.4% (95% CI 14.8%, 47.9%) for complex partial seizures (CPS) and 20.3% (95% CI 0.3%, 36.2%) for secondarily generalized tonic‐clonic seizures (GTCS). However, although 41 patients elected to continue with LTG, only 11 experienced at least 50% reduction in total seizures, indicating that other factors influenced their decision. The score with LTG, relative to placebo, was significantly lower for the ictal (p = 0.017) and caregivers (p = 0.035) subscales of the seizure severity scale and significantly higher for happiness (p = 0.003) and mastery (p = 0.003). Simple correlation and multiple‐regression analyses indicate that the effects on seizure frequency, seizure severity, and psychological variables appear to be independent of each other. This study indicates that LTG is effective in reducing seizure frequency and has additional favorable effects on seizure severity, mood, and perceived internal control. Some of the scales used indicate the potential of secondary measures of efficacy to enhance the sensitivity of trials of new AEDs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1993.tb02417.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
Smith, D., Baker, G., Davies, G., Dewey, M., & Chadwick, D. W.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-03
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
312-322
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2088440043
Cited by
330
References
6
FWCI
16.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes of Add‐on Treatment with Lamotrigine in Partial Epilepsy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1993.tb02417.x
The paper
Smith, D., Baker, G., Davies, G., Dewey, M., & Chadwick, D. W. (1993). Outcomes of Add‐on Treatment with Lamotrigine in Partial Epilepsy. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1993.tb02417.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.